boondock saints 2 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- boondock saints 2

Posted by jupiterone on Apr-13-2008 05:35:

boondock saints 2

http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/03/17...ets-greenlight/

month old but has their been any other development? i'm both yay and nay for this project but at least the old cast is returning (without defoe ).

anyways, how do you guys feel about a second?

Posted by Silky Johnson on Apr-13-2008 05:49:

Nay. Horrible idea.

Posted by mezzir on Apr-13-2008 06:20:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Nay. Horrible idea.

agreed, i see no need for a second one unless they have a REALLY dope plot idea. which i doubt.

Posted by Frenchie on Apr-13-2008 06:27:

Boondocks cannot be touched

Posted by Lucas-K on Apr-13-2008 07:10:

Another poor decision by the entertainment industry. When sequels to great classic movies are produced, they always fail miserably and then the original classic looses its value. This is one of those movies that is good by itself and needs to be left alone.

Posted by idoru on Apr-13-2008 07:19:

Fuck Hollywood. Unless this is ends up being fantastic, they really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, need to get some fucking creativity.

Posted by Frenchie on Apr-13-2008 07:23:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Fuck Hollywood. Unless this is ends up being fantastic, they really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, need to get some fucking creativity.
Why don't you write a goddamn fuckin' movie, eh? I'm sure everything you come up with has been done.

Posted by idoru on Apr-13-2008 07:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
Why don't you write a goddamn fuckin' movie, eh? I'm sure everything you come up with has been done.

One of these days, Alice, ONE OF THESE DAYS! *shakes fist*

Posted by Lucas-K on Apr-13-2008 07:26:

Agent Michael Scarn

Posted by Frenchie on Apr-13-2008 07:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Lucas-K
Agent Michael Scarn
= James Bond.

Posted by TranceArmstrong on Apr-13-2008 10:04:

thought the first was pretty mediocore, downright crappy at times and not in the least deserving of the cult-status and huge following it attained.

Posted by bas on Apr-13-2008 14:49:

I used to feel that the first movie left room for a sequel with their dad coming back and all. But now that it's been so long I can't possibly see it working, it would probably turn out to be way over actioned and lose the "indie" feel that the first one had. It would be another example of people trying to make money off the cult popularity of the first one. Fale.

Posted by chach on Apr-13-2008 15:46:

Cuddle? What a fag....

Posted by idoru on Apr-14-2008 00:27:

quote:
Originally posted by bas
I used to feel that the first movie left room for a sequel with their dad coming back and all. But now that it's been so long I can't possibly see it working, it would probably turn out to be way over actioned and lose the "indie" feel that the first one had. It would be another example of people trying to make money off the cult popularity of the first one. Fale.

Exactly.

Posted by whiskers on Apr-14-2008 00:42:

The second has has been in the workings for a looooooooooooong time
Doubt it will be as good, partly because people will be saying "doubt it will be as good"

Posted by iammesol on Apr-14-2008 00:46:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Exactly.

prus wan

Posted by Abercrombie on Apr-14-2008 01:49:

Utah Saints > Boondock Saints

Posted by Ted Promo on Apr-14-2008 01:51:

this storyline was wayyyy too weak to warrant a sequel.

Posted by jupiterone on Apr-14-2008 01:53:

guess i'm one of the few