[Acid Techno] DJ Alfi - 123 LSD - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- [Acid Techno] DJ Alfi - 123 LSD

Posted by itsamemario on Apr-19-2008 23:04:

[Acid Techno] DJ Alfi - 123 LSD

http://dump.no/files/959acde86e24/DJ_Alfi_-_123_LSD.mp3

Had myself a little groovesession tonight.. Let me know if you like it

Posted by cybernetica on Apr-20-2008 15:49:

i am liking the 303. The groove is great, but the drums sound too "dry" to my ears. Also I'm missing a bass fundament. Otherwise funny track.

Posted by meDina on Apr-20-2008 23:26:

i agree with the first reply.

cool groove/ideas but the percs sound a bit too dry. dig the rimshot melody build however.

Posted by itsamemario on Apr-23-2008 01:59:

aight.. so a little wetness do the drums then.. any opinions on the 303 filter automation? did it by hand

Posted by The Drow on Apr-27-2008 19:22:

I think that the wetness is unnecessary.
The fact that it's dry gives this track a certain grove.
I'm missing a huge wobbling bassline over here.
The rimshots kick ass.
The 303 is fucking awesome. You need a good bassline to compliment it.
Maybe add one more element to the track.
Some fx.

I might play this if there's a bass involved
7.5/10
Omer

Posted by itsamemario on Apr-27-2008 22:54:

quote:
Originally posted by The Drow
I think that the wetness is unnecessary.
The fact that it's dry gives this track a certain grove.
I'm missing a huge wobbling bassline over here.
The rimshots kick ass.
The 303 is fucking awesome. You need a good bassline to compliment it.
Maybe add one more element to the track.
Some fx.

I might play this if there's a bass involved
7.5/10
Omer

there acutally is a realy big sub bass going with the kick.. ive mixed this track on crappy generic multimedia speakers, so im guessing that they suck more than i thought.. played this track yesterday at my friends place, and i couldnt hear any of the sub bass there either..

Posted by DjAyTeKnOtRoNiC on Apr-28-2008 01:47:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
there acutally is a realy big sub bass going with the kick.. ive mixed this track on crappy generic multimedia speakers, so im guessing that they suck more than i thought.. played this track yesterday at my friends place, and i couldnt hear any of the sub bass there either..
You can here it pretty well but it sounds like its part of the kick and not a seperate bassline.

Posted by meDina on Apr-28-2008 06:48:

quote:
Originally posted by The Drow
I think that the wetness is unnecessary.
The fact that it's dry gives this track a certain grove.

dry & flat percs dont give anymore or less groove then percs that are not dry & flat

Posted by The Drow on Apr-28-2008 08:47:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
there acutally is a realy big sub bass going with the kick.. ive mixed this track on crappy generic multimedia speakers, so im guessing that they suck more than i thought.. played this track yesterday at my friends place, and i couldnt hear any of the sub bass there either..

Don't use a sub. Use a big punchy bassline.
And I donnu about the dryness, it adds something that makes you nod your head...

Posted by djFEI-FEI on Apr-30-2008 18:31:

quote:
Originally posted by The Drow
Don't use a sub. Use a big punchy bassline.
And I donnu about the dryness, it adds something that makes you nod your head...

by dry i mean they need to be tightened up with eq and some very light low decay verb

Posted by Domesticated on May-04-2008 06:46:

Haha, this is awesome.

Fuck a big bass line and wetter percs, I think the track sounds great as is.

However, I think you could do with some variation on percs; they get a bit monotonous.

Though I don't think this needs a bass line, it probably would keep things more interesting and you wouldn't need to change your percs, giving a more hypnotic effect.

Re: sub-bass line, I can hear it reasonably well as I have a sub here at my computer; it sounds alright.