moonbird - Futurity phase | need help(tranced)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- moonbird - Futurity phase | need help(tranced)

Posted by linkmage on Apr-28-2008 09:56:

moonbird - Futurity phase | need help(tranced)

Hello everybody.

I made new track ( maybe almost if i will see some more good criticism )

I don't know what style is it, because as usual I making something different with trance.. There is trance, electro, minimal elements..

I want make release of this, but I don't know who wants at all this kind of music..

Maybe you could help with some comments on track and on what can I do with this track?

moonbird - futurity phase
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]

Please help me if you can...

PS sorry for my english...

Birdie moonbirdie

Posted by kitphillips on Apr-28-2008 12:23:

Hey mate,

Flattered you asked my opinion For what its worth, I think this is a pretty good track. Its well produced and interesting, so thats a good start, it reminds me a bit of Hybrid in parts. I like the way it has plenty of different elements too, keeps it moving along at a cracking pace.

I'm not really sure who exactly would sign it, there are others around here more qualified to know than me. But it would be a nice change of pace in the middle of one of those Anjunabeats compilations IMO. I'd just send it to everyone, its usually a good policy

Posted by Lascodi on Apr-28-2008 13:03:

Extremely interesting music. Good track indeed. It's highly possible it has the potential to get released. Try some of these labels:
303Lovers, Hotfingers, Omnis, Starter, Presslab, M nus, Underline, Foundsound, S�hk� Recordings, Force Inc, Kompakt, Trapez, Tenax Recordings, Cadenza, Poker Flat Recordings, Wagon Repair, Marco Carola, Revolver Canada, Minimouse Records. I think they are all pretty welcoming for this minimal tech thingies.

Cheerz

Posted by kitphillips on Apr-30-2008 08:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Lascodi
Extremely interesting music. Good track indeed. It's highly possible it has the potential to get released. Try some of these labels:
303Lovers, Hotfingers, Omnis, Starter, Presslab, M nus, Underline, Foundsound, S�hk� Recordings, Force Inc, Kompakt, Trapez, Tenax Recordings, Cadenza, Poker Flat Recordings, Wagon Repair, Marco Carola, Revolver Canada, Minimouse Records. I think they are all pretty welcoming for this minimal tech thingies.

Cheerz

See, I told you other people had better ideas of labels than me

Posted by Subtle on Apr-30-2008 17:51:

Listening.

Nice bassline, kick works nice. Percussions are bleepy, but still driving.

I liked the first half of the track the best, the break halfways seems a little messy for me. a little too much going on for my tastes, but still this is an original idea. When the beat hits back the track sounds very nice.. I would have removed those upfront synths and made it a bit more minimal sounding overall.

Posted by Nicolas Oliver on Apr-30-2008 18:17:

This seems to be very well produced (e.g. the kick drum has a nice thump to it). However, the song feels like a mash-up of a few different styles that don't exactly sound great together. For instance, when the bass-line started at the beginning of the song I got the impression that this was going to be a dirty house track with some minimal elements (which would be right up my alley in terms of personal taste); but the trance-like synths (pads? sorry I'm new to producing) operating throughout complicate the tune and take it in a kind of upbeat/uptempo direction that doesn't fit well with the sounds originally introduced. In other words, my very noobish opinion is that this song contains elements that should be separated and placed into two different tracks, one more minimalist and one more trancey.