TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Myanmar disaster
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Magnetonium on May-08-2008 22:46:

Myanmar disaster



Whats worse -regime in Myanmar or Zimbabwe? After this tragedy, its hard to decide. Juntas refuse to allow professionals into the country to help with the terrible situation, those f*ckers. Not only visas have to be approved, but some UN and aid officials with their kits have not been allowed to enter the country.

The nature, the planet is very angry for the destruction and pain that humans are causing. "Rain hit with such speed 'it left marks on their faces'".

These disasters are just the beginning of the really terrible disasters that are to come this century (no brainer). Unfortunately. But there's no other way - environmental pollution and destruction has not stopped.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv.../International/

quote:

Rain hit with such speed 'it left marks on their faces'
Aid workers stunned to find survivors with 'visible scars, almost burns' as Myanmar toll climbs to 22,000 dead and 41,000 missing
GEOFFREY YORK

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail

May 7, 2008 at 1:48 AM EDT

BEIJING � The toll continued to rise Tuesday in the aftermath of a catastrophic cyclone in Myanmar, with 22,000 people dead and officials acknowledging that 41,000 more are missing. More than a million survivors are without food, water, electricity or telephones.

Relief workers who finally reached the survivors of Myanmar's cyclone Nargis Tuesday were stunned to find scars on their faces, evidence of the ferocity of the rain storm.

�They had visible scars, almost burns, on their faces from the driving force of the rain,� said Paul Risley, a spokesman for the United Nations World Food Program. �The rain had pelted them at such a velocity that it left marks on their faces. Our workers had never seen that before.�

UN assessment teams were struggling to reach the hardest-hit villages in the Irrawaddy delta, the main rice-producing region of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, where roads are almost impassable. When they did arrive, relief-agency helicopters encountered corpses scattered across the rice fields that bore the brunt of the storm.

Many people were killed by a massive 31/2-metre-high tidal wave that crashed through the delta at the peak of the storm. �It swept away and inundated half the houses in low-lying villages,� Maung Maung Swe, Myanmar's Minister for Relief and Resettlement, said in Rangoon Tuesday. �They did not have anywhere to flee.�

In the town of Bogalay in the delta region, 95 per cent of the houses were destroyed, he said.

The first trickle of relief supplies was beginning to reach some survivors yesterday, but Myanmar's military regime was still limiting the flow of food supplies and relief workers to the long-isolated country.

The regime is forcing all foreign relief workers to apply for entry visas, a process that can take several days. Some UN aid workers, who had wanted to go to Myanmar three days ago, will not be able to enter the devastated country until tomorrow because of delays in issuing them visas.

Other aid workers were still awaiting visas without any indication of when they will get them. The regime said the aid workers would have to �negotiate� for access to the country.

�It's been a very difficult process to get the government to accept offers of international assistance,� Mr. Risley said.

U.S. President George W. Bush urged the military regime to allow U.S. experts to assess the extent of the disaster. Two U.S. Navy ships, loaded with relief supplies for a nearby disaster-relief exercise, were heading toward Myanmar yesterday, without any assurance that they will be allowed to distribute their supplies.

�We're prepared to move U.S. Navy assets to help find those who've lost their lives, to help find the missing, to help stabilize the situation,� Mr. Bush said. �But in order to do so, the military junta must allow our disaster-assessment teams into the country.�

Myanmar's military junta prefers to receive bilateral aid from donor countries, which allows the regime to control its distribution. Thailand and India have already sent shipments of relief supplies to Myanmar, but the UN warned that those shipments are unco-ordinated. �The UN is very concerned that this will lead to a haphazard response,� Mr. Risley said. �There is an urgent need for co-ordination.�

The French government also complained about Myanmar's attempts to win control of the aid distribution. �The United Nations is asking the Burmese government to open its doors,� French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner told parliament. �The Burmese government replies, �Give us money, we'll distribute it.' We can't accept that.�

Tin Maung Htoo, executive director of Canadian Friends of Burma, said it's wishful thinking to expect that the Myanmar regime will shift to more democratic ways as a result of allowing foreigners to assist the country.

�This time we should focus on the relief effort first, but in return, I think, I'm hoping that the military will realize that these international people have good intentions,� Mr. Htoo said.

Not everyone was discouraged. Ramesh Shrestha, the Unicef representative in Myanmar, said the biggest problem facing relief efforts is a logistical one.

�The whole area is flooded,� he said. �Lots of bridges have collapsed. Hundreds of trees have fallen and are blocking the highways. The military is helping to clear the road and airlifting their supplies.�

Unicef Canada announced Tuesday it has launched an emergency appeal for funding to assist cyclone victims.

Mr. Shrestha was visiting family in Canada when the cyclone hit but spoke with workers in Myanmar, who relayed stories to him about contaminated wells, serious damage to crops and blocked seaports.

�Our office had a meeting with the Foreign Ministry and we were assured there would be free access to the UN and the international staff for movement and distribution of supplies, and we have been assured the same for visas; once [relief workers] apply for the visa, it will be granted.�

The World Food Program, with the help of a Dutch relief agency, distributed 30 tonnes of food from its local warehouse to homeless survivors at feeding centres in Rangoon yesterday. It is aiming to send another 26 tonnes of food to Myanmar in two flights from Thailand today. But a full-scale airlift or �air bridge� will be needed, as it was during the tsunami that devastated much of Southeast Asia in 2004, Mr. Risley said.

The 30 tonnes of aid delivered yesterday is a small amount, barely enough for 2,000 people to be fed for several weeks, he said.

Assessment teams in a township near Rangoon found that 27,000 homeless survivors were living in 42 shelters, including schools and monasteries, Mr. Risley said. Only 10 of the 42 shelters had any food or water. �The health situation in those shelters is reported to be deteriorating.�

In another district with a population of 140,000, about 40,000 are missing in the cyclone's wake, he said. �This is an extreme crisis. If these numbers hold up in other places, the death toll will likely continue to rise.�

According to the Canadian Friends of Burma, 3,000 to 4,000 Myanmarese expatriates moved to Canada since the pro-democratic uprisings in 1988. Many of those people who have relatives living in the Irrawaddy delta have been trying anxiously to reach them with no luck. Land lines and cellular contact have been disrupted since the cyclone hit last Friday.

Timothy Zaw Zaw, a 39-year-old who lives in Mississauga, has been trying to reach his mother and two sisters in Rangoon. He also has relatives in Singapore, India and Thailand trying to get through.

�I'm concerned for their safety,� he said. �I'm trying to contact them as much as possible.�

In an e-mail to family members, Canadian Andrew Kirkwood, the Myanmar program director for Save the Children, wrote that �there is no power in the city (and therefore no running water) and won't be for a month.�

�As you've probably seen on the news, the scale of the devastation here is unimaginable. We estimate 50,000 dead and millions homeless. We're going to be mounting a huge logistics operation for at least a year � we're all going to be working flat out for the foreseeable future.�

Dave Toycen, president and CEO of World Vision Canada, said 580 relief workers from his organization are in the process of providing bottled water, tents, tarpaulins, clothing and emergency medicines to affected areas.

�I think it's a good news/bad news story,� he said. �The good news is, we've got almost 600 staff on ground doing basic relief work. The bad news is, the numbers keep going up and it still appears the aid is simply not moving in fast enough.�


Posted by tathi on May-09-2008 01:05:

This is absolutely devastating news. The Burmese are some of the nicest people on earth. Ive been planning to go to Burma and Thailand to do a journalism piece, I have contacts in the Burmese refugee camps on the Thailand border...

quote:
Originally posted by ********
This issue is a classic example of how western foreign policy attacking a foregin state for their domestic policies hurts the common people. If prior to disaster good will existed maybe they wouldn't be so hard pressed to accept help when they needed it.

If the west didn't insult them for the last 20 years this issue likely wouldn't exist today.

The poor "SLORC" have hurt feelings because the west is criticising their internal policies like genocide
http://www.genocidewatch.org/alerts/burma.htm
http://burmamyanmargenocide.blogspot.com/
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/RM1.B.DEAD.PORTER.HTM

we should be ashamed of ourselves!


Posted by Q5echo on May-09-2008 01:21:

the thread starter thinks that the Cyclone that hit Myanmar is the fault of "environmental attrocities" and the first poster thinks the attrocity is the West's fault.

i bet they're both in agreement with each other too. thats awesome.


Posted by Krypton on May-09-2008 01:24:

Burma's military cares about staying power more than any destruction to their people...


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-09-2008 01:26:

quote:
Originally posted by tathi
The poor "SLORC" have hurt feelings because the west is criticising their internal policies like genocide
http://www.genocidewatch.org/alerts/burma.htm
http://burmamyanmargenocide.blogspot.com/
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/RM1.B.DEAD.PORTER.HTM

we should be ashamed of ourselves!


beat me to it jake. let's not let our distaste for components of western foreign policy cloud our judgement when it comes to obvious human rights abuses.

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
the thread starter thinks that the Cyclone that hit Myanmar is the fault of "environmental attrocities"


not that im downplaying the role of climate change in these kind of disasters, but burma has been getting thrashed by huge floods and storms for as long as i can remember. indeed, burma and lebanon were two countries i knew of as a child because they were always in the news for something horrible.


Posted by Magnetonium on May-09-2008 01:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
the thread starter thinks that the Cyclone that hit Myanmar is the fault of "environmental attrocities" and the first poster thinks the attrocity is the West's fault.

i bet they're both in agreement with each other too. thats awesome.


Remember than tsunami couple years back that took lives of over 250,000 people around Indian Ocean?


The weather has been acting up in the last 10-20 years. Al Gore was right about one thing. Just the causes are different - countless acres of trees are cut down every day. Human overpopulation has put a tremendous strain on the planet. Environment has been altered to the point where it results in extreme weather (not the dam global warming, its the dam destruction of the biosphere).


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-09-2008 01:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Remember than tsunami couple years back that took lives of over 250,000 people around Indian Ocean?


which was caused by an earthquake. which particular human activities do you believe contributed to the stress and movement of tectonic plates?


Posted by Magnetonium on May-09-2008 01:32:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
which was caused by an earthquake. which particular human activities do you believe contributed to the stress and movement of tectonic plates?


Not quite - human overpopulation is resulting in the higher number of people dying from disasters. About 150 years ago there was 4-5 times less people in the world. That same Burma was not that densely populated.

But at the same time the stress imposed by the population on the environment by destruction of rainforests, changing of terrain, release of pollution, methane (greenhouse gases), etc. = fuels the rage of the weather systems.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 01:35:

quote:
Originally posted by ********
Their country their choice. Countries like the US won't even recognize Myanmar, still calling it by it's imperialist colony name Burma, and have been bad talking it for years, then people wonder why countries like North Korea, Iran and Myanmar shun foreign intervention - maybe cause the west is out to get them, and letting anyone in is a security risk. This issue is a classic example of how western foreign policy attacking a foregin state for their domestic policies hurts the common people. If prior to disaster good will existed maybe they wouldn't be so hard pressed to accept help when they needed it.

They will recover none the less. If the west didn't insult them for the last 20 years this issue likely wouldn't exist today.

If you insult someone for long enough on a daily basis chances are they will consider any help you have to give to be some sort of intended harm.


out to get them with huge military ships full of rice and medical supplies. i hope they can outrun our supply ships, i wouldn't want people in some poor asian country mooching off my dollars.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 01:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Not quite - human overpopulation is resulting in the higher number of people dying from disasters. About 150 years ago there was 4-5 times less people in the world. That same Burma was not that densely populated.

But at the same time the stress imposed by the population on the environment by destruction of rainforests, changing of terrain, release of pollution, methane (greenhouse gases), etc. = fuels the rage of the weather systems.


so do you think humans influence earthquakes or not?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-09-2008 01:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Not quite - human overpopulation is resulting in the higher number of people dying from disasters. About 150 years ago there was 4-5 times less people in the world. That same Burma was not that densely populated.

But at the same time the stress imposed by the population on the environment by destruction of rainforests, changing of terrain, release of pollution, methane (greenhouse gases), etc. = fuels the rage of the weather systems.


Over population obviously doesn't help, but the central problem with these disasters is lack of infrastructure to adequately cope with such weather systems. Everyone knows burma is a hotspot for extreme weather conditions, but they are poor and lack the means to adequately house and protect their citizens. The higher death tolls obviously go hand in hand with higher populations, but compare the number of deaths from katrina to the number of deaths from the tsunami.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on May-09-2008 01:42:

Wow. Just wow.

First of all, it's Burma - and not Myanmar - for a very specific reason. Look up why the junta changed the name in 1989 and then ask a Burmese refugee what they call their country.

Second, the Burmese junta is among the most repressive in the world - to blame the West for the lack of aid reaching citizens there is simply absurd.


Posted by Q5echo on May-09-2008 01:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium

Remember than tsunami couple years back that took lives of over 250,000 people around Indian Ocean?


yeah, and...?

remember the Bhola Cyclone on 1970? killed almost half a million.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on May-09-2008 01:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
yeah, and...?

remember the Bhola Cyclone on 1970? killed almost half a million.


Remember Noah's Ark? Nuff said.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 01:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Remember Noah's Ark? Nuff said.


LOL.....seriously, that was one of the few times i've actually laughed reading a post. i thank you for that.


Posted by Q5echo on May-09-2008 01:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Not quite - human overpopulation is resulting in the higher number of people dying from disasters. About 150 years ago there was 4-5 times less people in the world. That same Burma was not that densely populated.

But at the same time the stress imposed by the population on the environment by destruction of rainforests, changing of terrain, release of pollution, methane (greenhouse gases), etc. = fuels the rage of the weather systems.


just stop, Al.

this cat. 3 storm wasn't any different in size or strength of any other cat. 3 aside from where it made landfall. storm surge pwns you


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 01:57:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Over population obviously doesn't help, but the central problem with these disasters is lack of infrastructure to adequately cope with such weather systems. Everyone knows burma is a hotspot for extreme weather conditions, but they are poor and lack the means to adequately house and protect their citizens. The higher death tolls obviously go hand in hand with higher populations, but compare the number of deaths from katrina to the number of deaths from the tsunami.


hurricane Andrew hit florida in 92 at 165 mph and only 65 people died. it has everything to do with preparation and moving people out of the way.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on May-09-2008 01:59:

quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
hurricane Andrew hit florida in 92 at 165 mph and only 65 people died. it has everything to do with preparation and moving people out of the way.


And the fact that in the United States most people have houses with concrete foundations and solid walls.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 02:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
And the fact that in the United States most people have houses with concrete foundations and solid walls.


very true, i can't argue with that. but most people don't stay in their homes during a serious hurricane. they usually get far away. that fact merely limits the damage in less severe hurricanes/tropical storms.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on May-09-2008 02:16:

quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
very true, i can't argue with that. but most people don't stay in their homes during a serious hurricane. they usually get far away. that fact merely limits the damage in less severe hurricanes/tropical storms.


Not in the developing world, where villagers probably don't know it's coming and surely don't have vehicles to drive inland.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 02:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Not in the developing world, where villagers probably don't know it's coming and surely don't have vehicles to drive inland.


i meant in the US. if that was true globally we wouldn't be talking about 100,000+ dead (or whatever the number is) in burma.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on May-09-2008 02:28:

quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
i meant in the US. if that was true globally we wouldn't be talking about 100,000+ dead (or whatever the number is) in burma.


Ah, I got ya - I thought you were supporting Mag's argument that the environment or overcrowding is responsible for the high death toll.


Posted by tathi on May-09-2008 02:29:

while i agree that in the first world there wouldnt be as many dead, but a 35 metre tidle wave and rain that left "scars on peoples faces" doesnt sound like any normal storm.


Posted by Q5echo on May-09-2008 02:33:

quote:
Originally posted by tathi
while i agree that in the first world there wouldnt be as many dead, but a 35 metre tidle wave and rain that left "scars on peoples faces" doesnt sound like any normal storm.


it was the geography, not the storm itself.


Posted by jerZ07002 on May-09-2008 02:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Ah, I got ya - I thought you were supporting Mag's argument that the environment or overcrowding is responsible for the high death toll.


no no no....it's all about the spread of information to warn residents. in essence, the government of burma is at fault.

anyway, what made you think i was supporting his argument? south Florida is pretty heavily populated, yet, only 65 people died in one of the strongest hurricanes ever to make landfall.


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.