TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- [Video] Robert Babicz on mastering
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Haak on May-12-2008 02:03:

[Video] Robert Babicz on mastering

Here's a pretty interesting clip with Robert Babicz aka Rob Acid in the studio talking about his mastering.

http://www.vimeo.com/808485


Posted by Beyer on May-12-2008 10:30:

Great video!


Posted by Lucidity on May-12-2008 13:40:

Awesome, I want his studio!!! especially the tape reel


Posted by Beyer on May-12-2008 13:48:

I might send him a track for mastering, next time I finish something good. Would be nice to hear what it would sound like, after running the mix through all that stuff.


Posted by Frequency Frank on May-12-2008 20:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Beyer
I might send him a track for mastering, next time I finish something good. Would be nice to hear what it would sound like, after running the mix through all that stuff.


Wonder what the cost would be

Edit: Looks like he wants 80 euros + 19% tax per track. Thought it'd be more. Would definitely be cool to see the difference he can make. I bet he's pretty selective though.


Posted by Massive84 on May-12-2008 20:58:

He says avoid Limiters and mastering devices.

But doesn't really explain technically why, expect saying it's not good for club systems.

Which somehow i doubt.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on May-12-2008 21:26:

Interesting video. I liked what he had to say about presets:

"I despise presets, a current musician's disease. Listening into various productions, people hardly try making sounds themselves anymore. If you listen more closely you can distinguish, "Ah, he took the preset from that sound, then did this and that to it." Everyone only uses these unbelievable worlds of preset sounds, although it's so easy to dramatically tune sounds with fine changes. You only have to want to."

And the way that mastering has become so important in selling a track:

"Mastering has extremely gained in importance for many people; it's also a sales criterion. You simply have a record that sounds good and is assertive. It really makes a racket in clubs. DJs prefer to play those rather than musically superb records which, however, get totally lost in clubs."


Posted by Haak on May-12-2008 22:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
He says avoid Limiters and mastering devices.

But doesn't really explain technically why, expect saying it's not good for club systems.

Which somehow i doubt.


I think he just means when people who don't know what they're doing just slap one on the master to get the track sounding loud, but end up squashing all the dynamics of the track.


Posted by pozz on May-15-2008 01:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
He says avoid Limiters and mastering devices.

But doesn't really explain technically why, expect saying it's not good for club systems.

Which somehow i doubt.


depends what you are listening for, and your expectations for a tune.

he did explain, but i guess he assumed that everyone knew what a limiter does. he said (i'm paraphrasing) "i dislike rectangles on the waveform display". imagine you put a song in your waveform display of choice and all you see is a rectangle the whole way (except if there is a breakdown or some sort of break, then it'll probably have a concave curve and little dips). what does that mean in a technical sense? it means a minimal amount of volume variation throughout the track - aka a loss of dynamics. the outcome is that the track sounds loud, but must importantly it sounds tedious. there's no sense of tension and release, or even build.

i could continue, but this stuff available all over the internetz. i guess the importance of all this is that volume really makes a track. you can argue all you want about how people use to be more creative way back in the day, but really the difference is about +8db or so.


Posted by dorifuto on May-15-2008 04:01:

Great video, cheers for sharing! Babicz is a master of mastering!


Posted by meDina on May-15-2008 06:43:

cool vid... anyone know the tracklist they used for the vid... or at least the same song that kept repeating.... unless it was all just 1 song.


Posted by Falck on May-15-2008 13:09:

Really good vid ... do I have to throw away my great Oxford limiter now?


Posted by Acton on May-15-2008 14:39:

that was a good watch

its a shame he didnt go into any great technical detail.

i was particularly interested in the layering of multiple compressors, i know quite a few producers do this but still cant get my head round it


Posted by StanVoid on May-15-2008 15:08:

does anyone know any common techniques for layering compressors?

I wouldn't even know where to start with that ...


Posted by BOOsTER on May-15-2008 15:20:

use something like a plugin chain in soundforge? or simply put them back to back on your master in Ableton or something? I don't know...

but I guess what he meant actually is the side-compression.
that is achievable with mix sends-returns...
you put one compressor with normal settings on your master and a compressor with drastic compression to your send 1...than you send ammount X of your master to your send, which is returning the drastically compressed signal...that gives a bit of that extra ooomph...if you get what I mean
oh btw...carefull...this should be done only up to about 5%

maybe someone else could explain this trick a little better


Posted by richg101 on May-15-2008 21:54:

i liked the idea of using a super over comped layer underneath a uncompressed layer. to get the best of both worlds.


i dont know what is not to understand with regards to layering compressors so you get a collaberative compression effect. just set each different comp to a different parameter and adjust the ratio/thresholds accordingly.


Posted by music2dance2 on May-16-2008 19:55:

I've wondered about this technique.


Posted by BOOsTER on May-16-2008 20:55:

so...was I right?


Posted by music2dance2 on May-16-2008 21:55:

sounds so but Im not sure myself so I cant confirm anything. I assume they are connected in a serial manner?


Posted by Haak on May-16-2008 21:59:

quote:
Originally posted by meDina
cool vid... anyone know the tracklist they used for the vid... or at least the same song that kept repeating.... unless it was all just 1 song.


I think most, if not all, of the tunes are from his last album, A cheerful temper
http://www.discogs.com/release/955385


Posted by Floorfiller on May-17-2008 02:59:

thanks for the link haak...was a good one hehe


i hope people payed attention...that's a real producer right there.


Posted by d_Verge on May-17-2008 06:46:

Awesome video! Thanks for sharing.

I love what he says about presets at the end, I'm constantly yelling at some friends of mine for using presets. lol


Posted by Lucidity on May-17-2008 16:17:

I believe this technique is called Parallel Compression? Many compressors have this built in, such as Fabfilter Pro C. Essentially there is a wet/dry mix, so you could do dramatic compression and just scale back the wet/dry mix.


Posted by BOOsTER on May-17-2008 17:45:

exactly parallel or side-compression that's called yeah


Posted by Lucidity on May-17-2008 17:51:

I thought so..... Good stuff there


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.