I found World in Conflict apparently you can have controls over submarines but it might be overkill for my system.
Posted by Ian on May-15-2008 10:07:
the "Worms" series of games (esp the earlier ones) is as far as I bother to go.
Posted by tortoise on May-15-2008 10:18:
Hate your friends with...
Posted by Yan on May-15-2008 10:23:
Go back and play some Red Alert.
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 10:29:
I hear Supreme commander is a good RTS
Posted by Darkarbiter on May-15-2008 10:30:
quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
I hear Supreme commander is a good RTS
I think we know who's alt this is.
Try wing commander the kilrathi saga. Very good games.
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 10:31:
quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
I think we know who's alt this is.
Try wing commander. Very good game.
lol? I'm not an alt...
Posted by Capitalizt on May-15-2008 10:33:
Supreme Commander sucks. Get World in Conflict. At 800x600 and medium details, it will run on pretty much any system. I also recommend Company of Heroes for a good WW2 strategy game.
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 10:36:
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Supreme Commander sucks. Get World in Conflict. At 800x600 and medium details, it will run on pretty much any system. I also recommend Company of Heroes for a good WW2 strategy game.
inb4 pkcRAISTLIN kills you
Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 10:52:
quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
I think we know who's alt this is.
like i'd bother with an alt dickhead. saluyamo was making a funny.
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Supreme Commander sucks
haha.
forged alliance is chess with thousands of individual units shooting the shit out of each other with simulated ballistics. i can understand why it isn't your thing, but don't lie to the children that "it sucks". for those willing to learn the game, other rts titles become childish in comparison.
Posted by on May-15-2008 10:53:
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Supreme Commander sucks. Get World in Conflict. At 800x600 and medium details, it will run on pretty much any system. I also recommend Company of Heroes for a good WW2 strategy game.
it has to be modern. the thing I dont like about world in conflict from the pictures I have seen it is not like a toy like command and conquer you have to hide people in buildings. I would like a game that is like an overview of a map and is fun to play but gives you more weapons. i guess it would be boring to have all those stupid stupid army vehicles too many variables. but a few tanks and artillery and submarines would be cool but probably would ruin it. Defcon is a cool game but mine always crashes.
Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 10:54:
how can you say that sucks? calculated ballistics for the win
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 10:57:
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
like i'd bother with an alt dickhead. saluyamo was making a funny.
haha.
forged alliance is chess with thousands of individual units shooting the shit out of each other with simulated ballistics. i can understand why it isn't your thing, but don't lie to the children that "it sucks". for those willing to learn the game, other rts titles become childish in comparison.
Supreme ruler 2020 also may be a good war game as it seems very indepth and should run on any PC, no graphic masterpiece though
Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 11:07:
quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
Supreme ruler 2020 also may be a good war game as it seems very indepth and should run on any PC, no graphic masterpiece though
yeah, ive been watching that but i read up reviews on 2010 and they said it was a bit of a stinker :/
Posted by Fledz on May-15-2008 11:14:
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Supreme Commander sucks. Get World in Conflict. At 800x600 and medium details, it will run on pretty much any system. I also recommend Company of Heroes for a good WW2 strategy game.
Both of those games are RTS that you really have to be careful about selling as the be all and end all of RTS games. Mainly because they are quite tough to get into and can get quite frustrating.
Both really good games but not for everyone. Sometimes you just want to build and blow shit up without needing to learn everything about the game.
With that being said though, I support Worms. God damn that game is fun, even though it's got nothing to do with RTS Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 11:18:
i'd also like to say that i think that forged alliance is the be-all and end-all of RTS gaming as at may 2008.
i am curious about starcraft 2 though.
Posted by Darkarbiter on May-15-2008 12:05:
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
like i'd bother with an alt dickhead. saluyamo was making a funny.
Right so I'm both a dickhead and I was automatically refering to you. Nice logic. You however do post like a jaded old man.
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 12:26:
quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
Right so I'm both a dickhead and I was automatically refering to you. Nice logic. You however do post like a jaded old man.
Erm he meant that he wouldnt reply to a dickhead alt. (I think so anyway)
Posted by on May-15-2008 12:59:
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
how can you say that sucks? calculated ballistics for the win
the graphics look cool but it might be too condusing. when they gayed up warcraft with world of warcraft I could not understand what everything does. warcraft 2 is alot cooler.
do you think forged aliance would run on a 2ghz with 512 of ram? and onboard graphics?
Posted by GTS3gEclipse on May-15-2008 13:07:
Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 13:09:
im sorry darkarbiter. there there.
Posted by saluyamo on May-15-2008 13:11:
quote:
Originally posted by LiL Woosi
the graphics look cool but it might be too condusing. when they gayed up warcraft with world of warcraft I could not understand what everything does. warcraft 2 is alot cooler.
WoW is not the same as Wc3... its like C&c renigade
quote:
do you think forged aliance would run on a 2ghz with 512 of ram? and onboard graphics?
no
Posted by kadomony on May-15-2008 13:11:
Posted by Darkarbiter on May-15-2008 13:16:
quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
WoW is not the same as Wc3... its like C&c renigade
no
Indeed. Not much in common... except for both having great story (they screwed over the story with having undead on horde side and stuff though... lets not forget the playable space faring purple octopie)
Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on May-15-2008 13:17:
come on guys, LiL Woosi is obviously taking the piss.
