TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- minimalism: technique versus style


Posted by nefardec on Jun-14-2008 19:49:

minimalism: technique versus style

i can't stand how a technique has been transformed into a style

minimal is only really minimal in the context of something else.


so many deejays i feel think of minimalism as a style, a fashion or otherwise hip/underground aesthetic, but i think the basic strength of minimal is that it can be played meaningfully in the context of something 'not-minimal'.

if you listen to dan bell's deejay sets, or move d's for instance, you will always hear a range of spacey, funky music. they move between more minimal grooves and noiser grooves.

in other words, minimal should be more of an adjective, but everyone seems to use it as a noun these days

a deejay can take a groove and strip it back simply with the selection of a track, revealing the basic foundation of the thing, and then embellish and express with the next selection. i think good techno deejays don't stick to one 'style', they play techno, and within this continuum they are free to become more minimal or deeper or harder, etc.

minimalism should be a technique for penetrating to the core of a thing, and not the sort of circus shitshow spectacle it has become


Posted by Az on Jun-14-2008 19:57:

Re: minimalism: technique versus style

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec

a deejay can take a groove and strip it back simply with the selection of a track, revealing the basic foundation of the thing, and then embellish and express with the next selection. i think good techno deejays don't stick to one 'style', they play techno, and within this continuum they are free to become more minimal or deeper or harder, etc.

+ fucking 1


Posted by Clovis on Jun-14-2008 20:22:

Pretty much.


Posted by |Thrax| on Jun-14-2008 20:43:

I agree.

Also, I love how you took this thread; and stripped it back simply with the selection of words, revealing the basic foundation of the thing.

makes sense to me.


Posted by SMC on Jun-14-2008 21:04:

Yes, in a context where everything is minimal the minimalism loses it's poignancy. That's what happens with most things when people forget about variation and contrasts.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Jun-14-2008 21:17:

This is why I (and possibly many others too) find minimal and would-be minimal very dull. There's nothing wrong with the tracks in isolation, but techno sets that never move past minimal and just wallow in the same genre for the sheer sake of it are deathly dull to me. Minimal techno should be used with other flavours to work properly.


Posted by DOOMBOT on Jun-14-2008 21:50:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
This is why I (and possibly many others too) find minimal and would-be minimal very dull. There's nothing wrong with the tracks in isolation, but techno sets that never move past minimal and just wallow in the same genre for the sheer sake of it are deathly dull to me. Minimal techno should be used with other flavours to work properly.

Richie Hawtin Live @ Mysteryland 2006

All minimal baby and my god does it work.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.