
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Remove Vocal
Posted by DANCESTORM on Jun-27-2008 07:52:
Remove Vocal
Do anybody know the theory, how the program removes vocal from the track?
Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-27-2008 07:52:
Not gonna happen.
Posted by Acton on Jun-27-2008 10:54:
i believe it has something to do with lab rats, paella and a left handed screwdriver
Posted by Freak on Jun-27-2008 11:38:
voodoo
or phase cancellation....
Posted by Nemesis44 on Jun-27-2008 11:55:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Freak
phase cancellation.... |
Yarp, as Freak states, phase cancellation would do it but you would need to get hold of an accapella of the vocal first. Assuming one was available.
There are a few bits of software out there that claim to do this but they don�t do it particularly well.
Cheers
Nem
Posted by DANCESTORM on Jul-01-2008 05:29:
Thanks ppl
but not enough info 
Posted by JD8180 on Jul-01-2008 07:00:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Nemesis44
Yarp, as Freak states, phase cancellation would do it but you would need to get hold of an accapella of the vocal first. Assuming one was available.
There are a few bits of software out there that claim to do this but they don�t do it particularly well.
Cheers
Nem |
i saw a video posted here of a tutorial where the guy would invert the instrumentals of a song, then line it up with the original track which would "cancel out" all the instrumentals, leaving just the vocals. is this true? or was that whole video a lie?
Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jul-01-2008 07:02:
| quote: |
Originally posted by DANCESTORM
Thanks ppl
but not enough info |
That's because it's not going to happen.
Posted by pwnage1 on Jul-01-2008 09:00:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
That's because it's not going to happen. |
+1 Countless threads will show this.
Posted by Stu Cox on Jul-01-2008 10:03:
| quote: |
Originally posted by JD8180
i saw a video posted here of a tutorial where the guy would invert the instrumentals of a song, then line it up with the original track which would "cancel out" all the instrumentals, leaving just the vocals. is this true? or was that whole video a lie? |
It's true, if the following are true:
1. You have the instrumental
2. The vocal version was not compressed after the vocal was added, i.e. the vocal version is simply an instrumental with the vocal added ontop
3. You can line the two up perfectly in an audio editor
1: may or may not be the case. If it isn't, give up now.
2: is very very rarely the case - nearly all tracks are given final mastering, which throws this out
3: you might be able to do, but it can be difficult.
So in short, the chances are very very slim.
The thread asked about REMOVING the vocal rather than obtaining it, in which case you'd use the acapella rather than the instrumental - the same still stands, you'd need to have access to the original acapella and the vocal version can't have been compressed after the vocal was added.
Posted by Max Thomson on Jul-01-2008 15:08:
get a hold of the multitrack?
Posted by MagicImpuls on Jul-01-2008 17:05:
Some Audicity and Adobe tutorials
http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...arch_type=&aq=f
Posted by Stu Cox on Jul-01-2008 17:48:
Yeah, there are a few things you can try there, but beware - most of them will only work every now and again.
The method used with Audacity there will only work if the vocal is the only thing centred, which it rarely is in electronic music - if nothing else it'll probably get rid of the kick as well as the vocal. Plus you're left with a mono version of the track, which you probably don't want.
The methods in Goldwave and Adobe Audition just use a feature in the program which uses a combination of channel position and filtering, which is usually far from perfect, but try them by all means.
Posted by epdarks on Jul-01-2008 17:55:
Get in touch w/ the producer, ask for a dub version.
Posted by Omega_Blue on Jul-02-2008 00:26:
even if you did all that crazy cancellation shit or whatever, from my experience the resulting product will still sound like shit
Posted by MSZ on Jul-03-2008 05:46:
all those vocal rip programs must be a sham then, im sure people buy them
Posted by shuni on Jul-03-2008 06:41:
| quote: |
Originally posted by msz
all those vocal rip programs must be a sham then, im sure people buy them |
quoted for truth
Posted by Stu Cox on Jul-03-2008 07:12:
| quote: |
Originally posted by msz
all those vocal rip programs must be a sham then, im sure people buy them |
Again, they use a combination of stereo positioning and filtering.
We're not saying it can't be done (well, I'm not at least), just that it's very rarely clean and would be noticeable that it'd been messed around with if you were to use a track with the vocal removed in a demo mix or something - you might just about get away with it in a club on a shit soundsystem.
If you got lucky and were successful in getting a reasonably clean vocal out of a track like that, you could probably get away with using that as an acapella in a mix, but again - 9 times out of 10 it would sound pretty shoddy on its own.
The main point is that there tends to be some naive misconception among some people that an audio file contains the different parts of the song separately and that you just have to "turn off" the vocal or whatever bit you don't want. You can get multitrack wave files, but they're very very rarely used and you certainly wouldn't be able to buy one from a download site. As audio files are actually just all of the instruments thrown in together, it makes it very difficult to separate them and in fact there is no known "perfect" solution, so any algorithms are based on guesswork.
Posted by lawrenceq on Jul-07-2008 00:18:
buy the dub mix, cos even if you managed to take out the vocal of a track it would prob sound fairly bland. the dub mixes compensate for that with a few here and there sounds that the original mixes dont have.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.