TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- producers who use dual screens
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by djandymac on Jul-08-2008 14:01:

producers who use dual screens

i havent been producing for that long and seem to get on fine with just 1 screen, can anyone tell me the benefits of having 2 screens instead of 1 ?


Posted by Sanguis Mortuum on Jul-08-2008 14:06:

Erm, more space, thats about it. You can have, for example, your sequencer or VSTs open on one screen and your mixer open on another screen so you can go back and forth much quicker. Its not really essential its just a nice luxury...


Posted by Lucidity on Jul-08-2008 14:10:

Sequencer 1 screen, Vst's other screen. I could never be with less than 2.


Posted by cryophonik on Jul-08-2008 15:06:

I typically have track view open in one screen and either my piano roll or mixing console view open in the other, depending on what I'm doing (creating vs. mixing).

If you do any other kind of software-intense work (e.g., web design, photo/video editing, writing, data analysis), you'll also get a huge benefit out of dual screens)

Once you try two screens, you'll never go back.


Posted by Subtle on Jul-08-2008 15:14:

its easier to do more things at the same time when you have 2 screens.


Posted by david.michael on Jul-08-2008 15:58:

I also like being able to see shitloads of piano roll at once when doing long melodies, so I sometimes extend it across both (I have dual 22" widescreens).


Posted by cybernetica on Jul-08-2008 16:40:

I have 2 screens and I would never go back to one screen. When I work with my Laptop I think its just too small.
unless you have a huge monitor with huge resolution, Especially when working in a sequencer 2 screens pay off. One screen is just for vsts, one for the arrangement.


Posted by Final Call on Jul-08-2008 18:09:

i agree with everyone else here. Can't bear to go back to only using one monitor! I myself mostly keep the arrangement page on the first screen and the mixer opened on the second. I see some people use more than two, but i think that'll just piss me off if i lose track of where my mouse arrow is lol


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jul-08-2008 21:06:

id like to try one 24" widescreen or something


Posted by Eric J on Jul-08-2008 21:19:

quote:
Originally posted by palm
id like to try one 24" widescreen or something


I'm using a single 23" Apple Cinema Display and it works out fine for me. However, on Logic, the user interface has been optimized for a single monitor.

I didn't like the idea of using two monitors because I like to have one monitor directly in front of me, and with two monitors I'd always be looking to one side. There are a few things I miss with two monitors, but the Cinema Display is big enough to accommodate my needs.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jul-08-2008 22:09:

yeah i like it infront of me too, i just want one. i heard the samsung 245b is good?


Posted by cybernetica on Jul-08-2008 23:18:

I've only heard good things about it and I was going to buy one myself for my ps3 and my laptop (i know im a geek).


Posted by CReddick on Jul-08-2008 23:38:

It's all about desktop real estate man.

I've been running dually screens for about 10 years now... I could never dream of going back. I'd even entertain a 3rd screen.

The more information you have in front of you at once, the better. I typically run Sequence in window 1. Mixer in window 2, shared with master freq analyzer and master meter. Ideally, I'd love to move all sorts of master output info to a 3rd screen and stick a piano roll on the 2nd one with the mixer... whatever.


Posted by Storyteller on Jul-08-2008 23:48:

2x 22" widescreen here. Love it. Very functional for me as well. More would be crazy for now, I don't have the room for it and 2x22" is almost 1 meter wide already.


Posted by Eric J on Jul-08-2008 23:49:

I had a Samsung 226BW 22" monitor for a little while before I switched to a Mac. I actually used it with the Mac for a few weeks before I bought the 23" Cinema display. At the time I thought the Samsung was pretty good and fairly big, so when I decided to purchase the Cinema display, I figured that I'd only be able to run the same max resolution since the Apple monitor was only 1 inch bigger.

I was pleasantly surprised when I brought home the Apple monitor and realized that the max resolution was a full order of magnitude bigger than the Samsung even though the Apple monitor was only one inch bigger. The Samsung max resolution was 1680x1050, where as the Apple monitor had a max resolution of 1900x1200.

Of course, the Apple Cinema display costs about twice as much as the Samsung, but it has been really worth it for me. The marriage of the Mac Pro with the Cinema Display provides a beautiful, vibrant color image and sharp, clean lines, perfect for producing when you have lots of small icons and a busy application screen. I would highly recommend that you check the specs and reviews before deciding to make a new purchase. I've always experienced that if something is too cheap, then there is probably a reason.


Posted by echosystm on Jul-09-2008 00:29:

i used to use 2x22", but it became more of an annoyance than anything. i hated having to look left or right all the time. now my second 22" is sitting on the floor, not even connected to my pc hah.


Posted by DJ RANN on Jul-09-2008 01:15:

I used to only be able to work on dual screens as I like to have the mixer page open (with vsts etc over it) on one and the arrange page on the other.

However since I got my new imac, and don't have the second screen anymore I haven't yet felt the need for another.


Posted by davidbuhau on Jul-09-2008 04:04:

i had 4 screens once... got confusing... but i couldn't work very well without dual screens. it's nice not having to move shit out of the way to do other shit.

david


Posted by Ray_Chappell on Jul-09-2008 14:55:

I use Reason rewired to Ableton quite a bit and having Reason and VSTs on one and Ableton full screen on the other is really helpful for me.


Posted by daeus on Jul-10-2008 11:21:

Like Bill Gates, the chairman and chief software architect of Microsoft said in Fortune Magazine on April 4, 2006, "On my desk I have three screens, synchronized to form a single desktop. I can drag items from one screen to the next. Once you have that large display area, you'll never go back, because it has a direct impact on productivity."


I think having a Mixer readout as you see/hear the track play is essential so seeing a full mixer on a second screen really helps and being able to tweak VST's during the live mix is tops.


Posted by Theran on Jul-10-2008 11:40:

I have 2x 17" TFT's, and I think there to small already. I'd like to go for 2x 22" TFT's but my budget won't let me yet.

Since I've been working with dualscreens, my productivity really increased. I was able to do more things at the time. I would never go back to 1 screen, I would prefere 3x 22" TFT's, but not only the budget won't let me, I don't have space for them to.

Go with dualscreen!!!


Posted by echosystm on Jul-10-2008 11:52:

i honestly think if you are going to get dual screens, don't get widescreens... your display area ends up being like 1m long and is a total pain in the ass. i ended up stacking my 22" monitors ontop of each other because its annoying to look side to side.

having two widescreen monitors like this also makes it basically impossible to position your speakers well... but everyone seems to forget about that, then spend $1k plus on monitors anyway.


Posted by Subtle on Jul-10-2008 11:54:

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
i honestly think if you are going to get dual screens, don't get widescreens... your display area ends up being like 1m long and is a total pain in the ass. i ended up stacking my 22" monitors ontop of each other because its annoying to look side to side.
Depens on the distance of everything else now doesnt it ?

I have 2x22" and it works perfectly fine for me, i have my right screen as my main screen and the left as secondary, works perfectly fine.
If i had used my left screen as primary that would be a different story.


Posted by Storyteller on Jul-10-2008 12:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Subtle
Depens on the distance of everything else now doesnt it ?


Exactly.

My speakers are about 1.50m apart, I'm only 1m away from the speakers. I don't mind, having the speakers a bit further apart accentuates the stereo image.

That's a good and simple help to ensure the pan settings will stay in a proper range. I prefer it that way honestly.

A lot of professional (stereo sound) studios have the speakers wider apart than the distance from the listener's point as well. Mostly somewhere in between 65 to 75 degrees calculated from listener's point. That's about as far as you can get without causing phase problems.


Posted by Acton on Jul-10-2008 13:13:

quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
i honestly think if you are going to get dual screens, don't get widescreens... your display area ends up being like 1m long and is a total pain in the ass. i ended up stacking my 22" monitors ontop of each other because its annoying to look side to side.

having two widescreen monitors like this also makes it basically impossible to position your speakers well... but everyone seems to forget about that, then spend $1k plus on monitors anyway.


well im screwed then lol


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.