TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Should airlines charge you by your weight?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by jpistone on Aug-29-2008 19:21:

Should airlines charge you by your weight?

With all of the cutbacks and extra fees in the airline industry over the past few months, it's difficult not to think about weight on an aircraft per passenger.But what if airlines charged by not only the weight of the luggage but also by the weight of the passenger? isn't it the next logical step?


Posted by Intangible on Aug-29-2008 19:23:

Re: Should airlines charge you by your weight?

quote:
Originally posted by jpistone
With all of the cutbacks and extra fees in the airline industry over the past few months, it's difficult not to think about weight on an aircraft per passenger.But what if airlines charged by not only the weight of the luggage but also by the weight of the passenger? isn't it the next logical step?


It would be another incentive to diet before a beach vacation


Posted by Import on Aug-29-2008 19:28:

Id guess the off chance that someone might harm themself in order to save money would reduce the chances of something like this ever coming into effect.


Posted by jpistone on Aug-29-2008 19:31:

wouldn't the environmental benefits of saving costly fuel and reducing our carbon footprint outweigh the chance that someone might harm them self?

quote:
Originally posted by Import
Id guess the off chance that someone might harm themself in order to save money would reduce the chances of something like this ever coming into effect.


Posted by Intangible on Aug-29-2008 19:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Import
Id guess the off chance that someone might harm themself in order to save money would reduce the chances of something like this ever coming into effect.


"This vacation cost me an arm and a leg"


Posted by activate on Aug-29-2008 19:39:

most airlines already force the real fatties to purchase an extra seat.

beyond that I think actually charging all constomers by weight is a stupid idea and will never happen. Any airline that actually did that would probably be out of business within a year... unless they could figure out a way for prices to be substantially lower that other airlines for average weight people.. which probably wouldn't happen.


Posted by DigiNut on Aug-29-2008 19:45:

Nah, not unless they take up two seats, in which case they already charge.

They should, however, place surcharges on B.O. rays strong enough to set off a Geiger counter. $10 per click.

And tack on a flat $500 for every time an infant cries, screams, or kicks the seat in front.


Posted by rabbitjoker on Aug-29-2008 19:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Intangible
"This vacation cost me an arm and a leg"


Har, har, har.


Posted by electro funk on Aug-29-2008 19:55:

i would love it if they did! being a skinny little shit would finally pay off! ahahaha


Posted by CAKE on Aug-29-2008 19:58:

Re: Re: Should airlines charge you by your weight?

quote:
Originally posted by Intangible
It would be another incentive to diet before a beach vacation


This is very true ...... i'm doing like a million crunches b4 the beach this weeknd


Posted by DigiNut on Aug-29-2008 20:00:

Re: Re: Re: Should airlines charge you by your weight?

quote:
Originally posted by Djsketchbag
This is very true ...... i'm doing like a million crunches b4 the beach this weeknd

Newsflash: No amount of crunches done in a single weekend will give you a six-pack.

Sorry. I've got some cellophane if you need that.


Posted by English Rachel on Aug-29-2008 20:12:

I actually think they should. Or at least there should be a maximum for you and your luggage....

I was going to be charged 60 pounds for 10kg over a couple of years back so I, in the middle of the check in, swapped my little shoes for boots, put another couple of tops on and had 3 cardis and 2 coats. It meant I only paid 10 pounds and I still wasn't as fat with all that on as the woman behind me.

I was fucking hot though.


Posted by cono_sur on Aug-29-2008 20:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Intangible
"This vacation cost me an arm and a leg"


lol. That was funny.


Posted by jpistone on Aug-29-2008 20:53:

i imagine it would work like this

you walk up to baggage counter and step onto a scale

i can just see those self concious woman asking that the scales be checked for accuracy as their positve they weighed ten pounds lighter in the morning hahaha


Posted by jpistone on Aug-29-2008 21:00:

-isnt fuel the biggest price airlines face? I flew monarch last summa to ibiza and i rem the dinner plate was some kinda napkin instead of a plate. the steward man got on the mike and told everyone that buy switching to those napkins it would save 3 million pounds (money) a year

quote:
Originally posted by activate
unless they could figure out a way for prices to be substantially lower that other airlines for average weight people.. which probably wouldn't happen.


Posted by DigiNut on Aug-29-2008 21:13:

quote:
Originally posted by jpistone
the steward man got on the mike and told everyone that buy switching to those napkins it would save 3 million pounds (money) a year

Right, that's if you eat the napkin, and leave the food to be re-frozen for the next flight.

(Don't worry - the food is actually papier-m�ch�, so the napkin is more nutritious anyway)


Posted by gummybear on Aug-29-2008 21:25:

They do charge people for a second seat..but, i'm wondering how this is determined.do they weigh the person??..and if they don't...wouldn't that make the decision subjective rather than objective..??

all in all, must be a very uncomfortable experience for all parties involved...


Posted by techead on Aug-30-2008 07:51:

quote:
Originally posted by English Rachel
I actually think they should. Or at least there should be a maximum for you and your luggage....

I was going to be charged 60 pounds for 10kg over a couple of years back so I, in the middle of the check in, swapped my little shoes for boots, put another couple of tops on and had 3 cardis and 2 coats. It meant I only paid 10 pounds and I still wasn't as fat with all that on as the woman behind me.

I was fucking hot though.

Ha Typical English Girl, just like my wife
never go anywhere without 500 pairs of everything


Posted by zoogla on Aug-30-2008 07:57:

quote:
Originally posted by techead
Ha Typical English Girl, just like my wife
never go anywhere without 500 pairs of everything

lol ur such a smooth customer


Posted by techead on Aug-30-2008 08:14:

quote:
Originally posted by fayraree
lol ur such a smooth customer

comes with being born on the other side of the pond
we are all smooth tongued devils


Posted by 1dawoman on Aug-31-2008 15:42:

This rational does make sense if seat prices could vary according to a formula which includes body weight IF the passenger has a BMI higher than 30 which accounts for gender and height. Logically, this would save airline companies a lot of money but I'm sure they're thought of this strategy already and opted not to put this into effect for fear of pissing off customers....


Posted by samhouse on Aug-31-2008 15:56:

I think it goes against basic human rights to charge someone for what they weigh.

it is one thing if the person is taking up two seats. But if the person can fit it one seat...then it is downright rude to charge them.


Posted by English Rachel on Aug-31-2008 16:15:

I disagree

I think each passenger should be allowed 100kg to be made up of themselves and their luggage... if every kg is so precious on a plane, why should one party pay for another?

When this is happening... http://news.carrentals.co.uk/airlin...t-3423314.html, every kg counts!

I totally agree that it would piss people off but I don't think it is against human rights


Posted by DigiNut on Aug-31-2008 17:01:

quote:
Originally posted by samhouse
I think it goes against basic human rights to charge someone for what they weigh.

Oh, and what "basic human right" would that be?

I certainly can't remember reading anything like that in the Charter, or the U.S. Constitution, or even the U.N.'s utopian declaration...


Posted by samhouse on Aug-31-2008 17:19:

granted it may not be a written rule. But human beings should atleast try and live by a code of unwritten morality.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.