Breakfast & Saint Jules - Only Two Should Know (Moody Remix)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Breakfast & Saint Jules - Only Two Should Know (Moody Remix)
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by rubez on Sep-24-2008 00:49:

Breakfast & Saint Jules - Only Two Should Know (Moody Remix)

the main mix is boring typical wonky breakfast lines.

the campfire mix is minimal. but not bad.

the moody mix is absolutely class.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg8NeaRFERg
brilliant trance. great feeling.
sounds 10 times better with a high quality copy and headphones. check out the youtube low quality clip and turn it up. let all the elements start up and come together. a good trance tune in 2008

Posted by arturob on Sep-24-2008 01:19:

i love

Posted by rubez on Sep-24-2008 11:26:

very warm and very blissful.

does anyone know who produced this moody remix?

breakfast or saint jules solo?

id be surprised if it was breakfast himself, but i dont know who saint jules is...

classy tune!

Posted by david.michael on Sep-24-2008 13:07:

quote:
Breakfast & Saint Jules - Only Two Should Know (Moodymau5 Remix)

fixed

Posted by rubez on Sep-24-2008 16:11:

it wasnt deadmau5

why?! it wasnt deadmau5 that made this "moody" remix was it?

Posted by GrimReaper on Sep-24-2008 16:17:

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
why?! it wasnt deadmau5 that made this "moody" remix was it?

No but it's just one of the countless tracks following the exact same formula than what artists like Adam K (& Soha), Glenn Morrison, Deadmau5, Inpetto, Jose Amnesia and several others have been doing recently.

Posted by Scoops on Sep-24-2008 16:56:

Chris Moody???

Posted by coolestrl on Sep-24-2008 18:00:

saint jules = big mike?

Posted by david.michael on Sep-24-2008 18:28:

Re: it wasnt deadmau5

quote:
Originally posted by rubez
why?! it wasnt deadmau5 that made this "moody" remix was it?

No, but this is a blatantly obvious attempt at emulating that style.

That being said, it's not a bad track at all, but I have trouble seeing past it just because it's so glaringly clear what's happening there.

Posted by kadomony on Sep-24-2008 21:25:

quote:
Originally posted by coolestrl
saint jules = big mike?

obviously :P

and, they weren't "attempting to emulating that style."

Posted by Dj_Es-Dva on Sep-24-2008 23:26:

Posted by elFreak on Sep-24-2008 23:29:

quote:
Originally posted by kadomony
obviously :P

and, they weren't "attempting to emulating that style."

you are right they did emulate it, not attempted to.

Posted by daphunky1 on Sep-26-2008 00:05:

Re: Re: it wasnt deadmau5

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
No, but this is a blatantly obvious attempt at emulating that style.

That being said, it's not a bad track at all, but I have trouble seeing past it just because it's so glaringly clear what's happening there.

Ya but this is a good track...the "sound" isn't even so in your face as many of the other tracks like it. It's a style of track, and there's good and bad in everything.

Posted by Stef on Sep-26-2008 02:30:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
you are right they did emulate it, not attempted to.

Yeah because when someone has a kick and chords in their tracks that means they are copying deadmau5.

Posted by whiskers on Sep-26-2008 04:51:

quote:
Originally posted by GrimReaper
No but it's just one of the countless tracks following the exact same formula than what artists like Adam K (& Soha), Glenn Morrison, Deadmau5, Inpetto, Jose Amnesia and several others have been doing recently.

my first thought

quote:
Originally posted by Dj_Es-Dva
Jose Amnesia is doing it too now LOL

my second thought (more of a "damn it, after 'eternal'...")

quote:
Originally posted by Stef
Yeah because when someone has a 1/8th pattern in their tracks that means they are copying deadmau5.

fixed that for you

i don't hear anything catchy or worthy in this tune.

Posted by kadomony on Sep-26-2008 05:04:

it certainly wasn't intentional

Posted by david.michael on Sep-26-2008 13:28:

quote:
Originally posted by kadomony
it certainly wasn't intentional

Oh, come on. Really?

C'mon, play them at the same time. I just did a mashup in-browser. Fuck Traktor, I'm playing off of YouTube from now on.

Posted by whiskers on Sep-26-2008 16:43:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
C'mon, play them at the same time. I just did a mashup in-browser. Fuck Traktor, I'm playing off of YouTube from now on.

A friend of mine has been doing that for a while, I tried it too. He's even tried to program a simple crossfader that will fetch videos from youtube and crossfade from one to the other. Too bad quality is crap, the availability of tracks is pretty good.

Posted by jupiterone on Sep-26-2008 16:48:

campfire mix is so much better than this

Posted by david.michael on Sep-26-2008 17:16:

quote:
Originally posted by whiskers
A friend of mine has been doing that for a while, I tried it too. He's even tried to program a simple crossfader that will fetch videos from youtube and crossfade from one to the other. Too bad quality is crap, the availability of tracks is pretty good.

lol, that's pretty funny. Have him add a pitch control and I'll buy it.

Posted by kadomony on Sep-26-2008 18:55:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Oh, come on. Really?

Yes, really.

Posted by david.michael on Sep-26-2008 18:57:

quote:
Originally posted by kadomony
Yes, really.

It's just amazing to me that you couldn't think there is a difference in the formula used here. I'm not arguing the quality or enjoyability of the track at all, but the formula is glaringly obvious.

Posted by kadomony on Sep-26-2008 19:07:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
It's just amazing to me that you couldn't think there is a difference in the formula used here. I'm not arguing the quality or enjoyability of the track at all, but the formula is glaringly obvious.

As said before, just because it has the same formula as a certain producer is known for using, it doesn't mean that they were intentionally trying to copy that producer's "style."

Posted by david.michael on Sep-26-2008 19:08:

quote:
Originally posted by kadomony
As said before, just because it has the same formula as a certain producer is known for using, it doesn't mean that they were intentionally trying to copy that producer's "style."

When the style is so distinct, I beg to differ. Agree to disagree, I suppose.

Posted by rubez on Sep-28-2008 16:08:

Filterheadz-Day At The Beach Original Mix

Eric Prydz-Pjanoo Original Mix

listen to these 2. they sound exactly the same in "formula"... who are you saying is copying who? as they are both accomplished producers. music can only be a certain formula or else it doesnt work.

the moody mix of the breakfast tune is simple but it works. it feels great. theres bound to be hundreds of tunes like it before, and there will be after.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »