TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Will recreational drugs become legal within the next fifty years?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Oct-31-2008 22:18:

Will recreational drugs become legal within the next fifty years?

I have asked many people my age whether they support the decriminalization of recreational drugs like marijuana, ecstasy, mushrooms, and so on, and they almost universally do so. Of course, I may have taken a biased sample, but I still think that more young people support decriminalization than not.

Given this climate of opinion, what do you think will happen in the next fifty years to the current laws against the possession and sale of recreational drugs? Will the current generation of youth back off from its libertarian stance and come to support the status quo (criminalizing drug use) when it takes charge of politics, or will things change?


Posted by bas on Oct-31-2008 22:22:

God willing.


Posted by walcott on Oct-31-2008 22:29:

Well, marijuana might (in the US) as long as it provides long-term benefits & substantial profit - + GDP , taxes, etc, etc

Just a guess...


Posted by T-Soma on Oct-31-2008 22:35:

Definitely.

I know that here in AUS with weed (unless its an amount that your possession can be deemed as trafficking) the first time you get busted you get let off with nothing but a recemondation to some kind of drug clinic lol.

I know plenty of people who have been busted smoking up in car parks in their cars and nothing happened.


Posted by Akridrot on Oct-31-2008 22:43:

It won't be as simple as legalization, but I believe that responsible drug users will soon live in a country where they don't have to worry about being prosecuted.


Posted by bamski on Oct-31-2008 23:05:

We have very strict laws on drugs here. But I've been busted for smoking twice (once with a blunt in my mouth at a party, and once smoking a bong in the park).

And once for possession (I had something like 5 grams of hash). Didn't even get a slap on the wrist. The boys in blue actually replied "too much paperwork over nothing, move along, sir."

That's a pretty promising start!

And decriminalization will probably not increase the amount of users dramatically, it'll only help get rid of crap hash that consists mainly of rubber and beewax lol, which will be replaced by green. That'll save a billion in health costs in the long run.


I just realized that my post probably didn't have anything to do with the question at hand, but I'm stoned and therefor hopefully excused, lol.


Posted by walcott on Oct-31-2008 23:31:

Yes, abolish hash. When in Europe, I couldn't even breath when my friends smoked that shit


Posted by Krypton on Oct-31-2008 23:55:

Marijuana will be decriminalized. That's about it.


Posted by Lira on Nov-01-2008 00:02:

Not where I live. Legalising recreational drugs is actually quite complicated, as you've got to convince drug dealers to pay taxes, among other things. Also, would you give want the state to give amnesty to all those imprisoned due to drug-related charges? Would you legalise all recreational drugs, or would crack remain forbidden? Where would you draw the new line? How would neighbouring countries/states react to that?


Posted by bamski on Nov-01-2008 00:04:

I'd be quite satisfied with drawing the line at Mary's house


Posted by Zoso on Nov-01-2008 00:12:

I'm afraid the whole "justice system" we've created (from an economic standpoint) will stand in the way of this. When I was a teen, if you got in trouble with the local police, they'd pick you up and call mom and dad unless you were just really, really showing your ass. A few short years later, it was all about 11-29 probation, pay for drug test, pay court costs, pay the probation officer, etc. It's like the military-industrial complex, only smaller for now.


Posted by bamski on Nov-01-2008 00:20:

I'd really like to know how the whole legalization process went down in the Netherlands.


Posted by walcott on Nov-01-2008 00:20:

What about P.I's in the US? ridiculous...

minor misdemeanor lol


Posted by UmmiE on Nov-01-2008 00:26:

Well I hope it happens soon so I can enjoy it in my life......Lighting up a nicely rolled joint on sunny day at park without the fear of anyone..........its not that I havent done it....but I would like to do it when no one can say shit,now that would be gold.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Nov-01-2008 21:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Zoso
I'm afraid the whole "justice system" we've created (from an economic standpoint) will stand in the way of this. When I was a teen, if you got in trouble with the local police, they'd pick you up and call mom and dad unless you were just really, really showing your ass. A few short years later, it was all about 11-29 probation, pay for drug test, pay court costs, pay the probation officer, etc. It's like the military-industrial complex, only smaller for now.

But what about when people who are now in their teens and twenties become the administrators of the justice system?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Nov-01-2008 21:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Not where I live. Legalising recreational drugs is actually quite complicated, as you've got to convince drug dealers to pay taxes, among other things.

Well, legalizing it would put the current "drug dealers" in the same context as other businesses. I think you could make a decent analogy with the alcohol industry; not paying taxes would land them in jail, as would selling product that did not adhere to certain regulations.

quote:
Would you legalise all recreational drugs, or would crack remain forbidden?

All of them. Why do people think that governments should have jurisdiction over what people can put into their own bodies?


Posted by Lira on Nov-02-2008 01:24:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Well, legalizing it would put the current "drug dealers" in the same context as other businesses. I think you could make a decent analogy with the alcohol industry; not paying taxes would land them in jail, as would selling product that did not adhere to certain regulations.

Given the current situation, I'm not sure they would mind the possibility of being jailed. They're used to it, aren't they?
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
All of them. Why do people think that governments should have jurisdiction over what people can put into their own bodies?

I don't disagree with you, but I think people simply don't want to pay the medical bills of drug addicts in general.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Nov-02-2008 03:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Given the current situation, I'm not sure they would mind the possibility of being jailed. They're used to it, aren't they?

Maybe, but those who produced drugs legally could make them in massive quantities and probably at lower cost and higher quality than those who tried to make them illegally, driving the illegal folks out of business.

quote:
I don't disagree with you, but I think people simply don't want to pay the medical bills of drug addicts in general.

Would legalization increase the number of addicts? As far as I know, no one has answered that question definitively.


Posted by Lira on Nov-02-2008 03:27:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Maybe, but those who produced drugs legally could make them in massive quantities and probably at lower cost and higher quality than those who tried to make them illegally, driving the illegal folks out of business.

Maybe they could produce better drugs in massive quantities, but at lower costs? I find it hard to happen once you start paying taxes.
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Would legalization increase the number of addicts? As far as I know, no one has answered that question definitively.

It needn't increase - I just think voters would feel they're supporting the proliferation of diseases drug addicts bring to themselves. Not that it makes any sense to me, but I've heard this kind of argument quite a few times.


Posted by sensorium on Nov-02-2008 03:53:

Re: Will recreational drugs become legal within the next fifty years?

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
...

Given this climate of opinion, what do you think will happen in the next fifty years to the current laws against the possession and sale of recreational drugs? Will the current generation of youth back off from its libertarian stance and come to support the status quo (criminalizing drug use) when it takes charge of politics, or will things change?


Very good question wondering mind. It is my opinion--and by opinion I predict a comment that can't be debated against because I don't really care what comes next-- that a couple of drugs will be legalized in the time-space you indicated. How-the-shamefully-fu_k_ever, given the conservatory inclinations of this respectful country (US of A), I doubt this country would be the first to legalize the use of recreational drugs you drooled over or indicated. I might be wrong though, about the prediction and not about your drooling.

And, and far as the second question question goes, well, I don't really have an answer for that one. But, looking at it, even though I didn't know it was there-- wtf? -- I can say that the youth, because they are to be innovative, they will find a way to rebel against the status quo. They are supposed to have different ideas, and some do, I don't deny it.

But, to be honest, in the next 50 years, I only care about the national selections that might win the next football world cups. There is excellent youth talent coming out from every country. There will be so much potential. Damn, WC 2010 will be incredible! I can even picture C. Ronaldo choking.

As you were...


Posted by Ted Promo on Nov-02-2008 04:04:

quote:
Originally posted by T-Soma
Definitely.

I know that here in AUS with weed (unless its an amount that your possession can be deemed as trafficking) the first time you get busted you get let off with nothing but a recemondation to some kind of drug clinic lol.

I know plenty of people who have been busted smoking up in car parks in their cars and nothing happened.


They even get to keep their stash? That'd be pretty boss.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Nov-02-2008 04:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Maybe they could produce better drugs in massive quantities, but at lower costs? I find it hard to happen once you start paying taxes.

Just look at the position of bootleg alcohol in countries where alcohol is legal. Sure, there is still some production of it going on, but nowhere near what it would be if it were illegal, since people realize that they can get a safer, higher quality product and avoid clashes with the law by purchasing the legal stuff. Why would the same thing not happen with other drugs?

If there were a system of licensing such that drug-selling businesses would have to register in order even to buy drugs from legit manufacturers, the illegal dealers would be cut out of the supply chain and would continue to have to pay for the manufacture of their drug in dodgy facilities and its concealed transport by people who expected to be well-compensated for the risk that they undertook. This is why illegal drugs are so expensive now in spite of being untaxed: everyone in the production-transport-sale chain wants a big pay cut because of the risks he takes in being part of an illegal operation. If this risk remained in place for tax-avoiding dealers and their suppliers, the drugs they sold would remain expensive just like they are now, and they would be driven out of the market by legit companies who could avoid the risks that kick up the prices charged by illegal producers and dealers.


Posted by Knowland on Nov-02-2008 04:59:

Whatever pisses us off in 50 years will be the norm!

*somewhere in our future*

Back in my day sonny, we would get arrested (the children gasp) for having drugs like these. We would drive 15 miles in the snow just to smoke a bowl. Now everybody has a hash pipe. Times dun changed.


Posted by wick on Nov-02-2008 05:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
I don't disagree with you, but I think people simply don't want to pay the medical bills of drug addicts in general.


There's already a shit load of cash being spent on the futile war on drugs.

If drugs became legal, the tax dollars made from them would be put back into the system to pay for those medical bills, education etc


Posted by Sunsnail on Nov-02-2008 05:50:

quote:
Originally posted by ********
Is it illegal to brew alcohol? I've been brewing a little, myself, made some cider which is pretty good, added it to some hot cocoa last night, pretty tastey.. also currently brewing a less safe drink mix of apple cider and banana wine. None the less for 1$ for 6 gallons of up to 18% alcohol, it is really just what you brew.. a lot less expensive than buying from an outlet. Of course social drinking in an establishment is a little different, as you can't bring your own alcohol into a restaurant or bar or club setting, it just isn't appropriate. Also tasting some brands is nice now and then. However I'm having some fun with brewing my own. Where is it illegal to make your own alcohol for home consumption?


It's legal to brew alcohol, except you can't distill anything. And you can't tell it without getting a license



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.