TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- I wonder if I'm related to Mr. Bush and Cheney and Obama too
Everybody in the world is related by marriage. A second cousin of yours might be a 5th cousin of someone else who is a 10th cousin of Michael Jackson. Technically, by marriage you are distant cousins.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ******** not one person comments? I talked to someone from the islands today and they didn't beleive me. |
You really need to lay off the crack 
Everyone's related if you're prepared to go back about 4,000 generations. If you go back 9 generations, we each have 512 great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents, who could each have 100s of modern decendants (albeit with some overlap). Depending on how isolated the history of our gene-pool has been, we're all almost certainly related (within just nine generations - the odds increase exponentially with each further generation you go back) to many, many famous people, both living and dead.
Nothing remarkable about that, it's just basic maths.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Everyone's related if you're prepared to go back about 4,000 generations. If you go back 9 generations, we each have 512 great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents, who could each have 100s of modern decendants (albeit with some overlap). Depending on how isolated the history of our gene-pool has been, we're all almost certainly related (within just nine generations - the odds increase exponentially with each further generation you go back) to many, many famous people, both living and dead. Nothing remarkable about that, it's just basic maths. |
.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Everyone's related if you're prepared to go back about 4,000 generations. |

I'd like to give a shoutout to all my fellow distant cousins who posted in this thread! 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira Well, weren't we all in Africa back then? ![]() |

| quote: |
| But, it seems you don't need to go too far. Still, I wonder how far back I need to go to find out I'm related to my fiancée, given the fact that most of our recent ancestors came from opposite parts of the same gigantic landmass... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by verndogs I'd like to give a shoutout to all my fellow distant cousins who posted in this thread! |
Sup, cousin Verns!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Well, exactly. ![]() The date's pretty hard to pin down, but at some point in human history (most likely 100,000+ years ago, which would place it before the first human migrations out of Africa depending on which migration model you believe) there must have existed a woman from whom all human beings are directly decended. It's just a simple biological / mathematical necessity that all members of a species must be directly related to a single female and a single male (who would have lived much more recently than the female, incidentally), but it's still pretty amazing to think about. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Probably not too far, apparently, unless one of you is Polynesian and the other one African: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_a...netic_variation |
), Europeans are most closely related to East Asians, which I don't think is surprising.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by shaolin_Z Indeed, we're all one big dysfunctional family of crazy monkeys . |
and we are one...
here is an interesting tid bit:
did you know jesus was a jew??

I'm related to Sarah Palin. And Gandhi.
I don't understand why people care about their genealogical roots. What does that tell us about ourselves as individuals? Not much, perhaps as a group... which would reflect a bit about oneself as an individual depending on how much you embrace or reject from your cultural environment and in turn tells you a little about some aspects of yourself... and maybe a little bit about it's history which might help understand why certain cultural phenomenon exist, and why in that state. But that's really about it. I'm a descendant of Muhammad, the final and last Prophet according to Islam, since my tribal lineage comes from Zain-ul-Abidenn, the 13th Shi'ia Imam, who is a direct descendant and my blood line is just one of the many. You would imagine as a Muslim I might find this to be really "cool" and "fascinating" or something. Well, I don't. I think it's absolutely irrelevant and has absolutely nothing to do with me as an individual. I am in no way any better or worse than any other human on the planet. Point is... does it matter what your geneology is? I guess the only reason why it matter to most is since they cannot define themselves with out appropriating that identity through some external phenomenological factor or grouping.
In short, I'm just curious why you brought it up and what input you were expecting from anyone else?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Well, exactly. ![]() The date's pretty hard to pin down, but at some point in human history (most likely 100,000+ years ago, which would place it before the first human migrations out of Africa depending on which migration model you believe) there must have existed a woman from whom all human beings are directly decended. It's just a simple biological / mathematical necessity that all members of a species must be directly related to a single female and a single male (who would have lived much more recently than the female, incidentally), but it's still pretty amazing to think about. Probably not too far, apparently, unless one of you is Polynesian and the other one African: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_a...netic_variation |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.