TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than in Darwin's Theory of Evolu

More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than in Darwin's Theory of Evolu

quote:

ROCHESTER, N.Y., Dec 10, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- That very large majorities of the American public believe in God, miracles, the survival of the soul after death, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, and the Virgin birth will come as no great surprise. What may be more surprising is that substantial minorities believe in ghosts, UFOs, witches, astrology, and the belief that they themselves were once other people. Overall, more people believe in the devil, hell and angels than believe in Darwin's theory of evolution. These are some of the results of The Harris Poll(R), a new nationwide survey of 2,126 U.S. adults surveyed online between November 10 and 17, 2008 by Harris Interactive(R). Some of the interesting findings in this new Harris Poll include: -- 80% of adult Americans believe in God - unchanged since the last time we asked the question in 2005. Large majorities of the public believe in miracles (75%), heaven (73%), angels (71%), that Jesus is God or the Son of God (71%), the resurrection of Jesus (70%), the survival of the soul after death (68%), hell (62%), the Virgin birth (Jesus born of Mary (61%) and the devil (59%). -- Slightly more people - but both are minorities - believe in Darwin's theory of evolution (47%) than in creationism (40%). -- Sizeable minorities believe in ghosts (44%), UFOs (36%), witches (31%), astrology (31%), and reincarnation (24%). Differences between Catholics and Protestants There are no significant differences between the large percentages of Catholics and Protestants who believe in God, miracles, heaven and hell, that Jesus is the Son of God, angels, the resurrection of Jesus, the survival of the soul after death, the Virgin birth and the devil. However, Catholics are more likely than Protestants to believe in Darwin's theory of evolution (by 52% to 32%), ghosts (by 57% to 41%), UFOs (by 43% to 31%), and astrology (by 40% to 28%). Protestants are slightly more likely than Catholics to believe in creationism (by 54% to 46%). Which Religious Texts Are the "Word of God" Slender majorities of all adults believe that all or most of the Old Testament (55%) and the New Testament (54%) are the "Word of God." However, only about a third of all adults (37% and 36%) believe that all of these texts are the word of God. Interestingly, only 26% of all adults believe that the Torah is the word of God, even though it is the same as the first five books of the Old Testament. Presumably many people do not know this. Religiosity and Religious Practice Less than a quarter of Americans describe themselves are "very religious." However, a large majority (68%) describe themselves as either very (23%) or somewhat (45%) religious. A quarter (27%) of adult Americans claim that they attend church once a week or more often, compared with 36% who say they attend less than once a year or never (18% each). A Note on the Methodology Used and How It Affects the Results Other research has shown that when replying to a question administered impersonally by a computer, people are less likely to say they believe in God, or attend Church services when they really don't. It is generally believed that surveys conducted by live interviewers tend to exaggerate the numbers of people who report the socially desirable, or less embarrassing, behavior, and that the replies given to an online survey such as this, are more honest and therefore more accurate. Methodology This Harris Poll(R) was conducted online within the United States between November 10 and 17, 2008 among 2,126 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents' propensity to be online. Full data tables and methodology are available at www.harrisinteractive.com These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls. J35171 Q956, 961, 1340, 1545 About Harris Interactive Harris Interactive is a global leader in custom market research. With a long and rich history in multimodal research, powered by our science and technology, we assist clients in achieving business results. Harris Interactive serves clients globally through our North American, European and Asian offices and a network of independent market research firms. For more information, please visit www.harrisinteractive.com. Harris Interactive Inc. 12/08 SOURCE: Harris Interactive Inc. SOURCE

Don't know what to feel.... lord???

knowing the ignorance that follows maybe 75% of these types....... man...

O lawds, a week-long survey with less than 2,200 participants!

The evolution part is really quite dismal though. But then again, they said they questioned minorities. Which minority and did they get most of their data on a Sunday morning? This is about as scientific as sociology gets.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On This is about as scientific as sociology gets.

Well, they assist clients in achieving business results

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On O lawds, a week-long survey with less than 2,200 participants!

arent polls around the 1000 mark sufficient for basic study?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN arent polls around the 1000 mark sufficient for basic study?

if i remember my undergrad stats class correctly, a population of 500 is substantial enough for statistically significance.

fuck i hated stats. numbers just dont interest me :/

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN fuck i hated stats. numbers just dont interest me :/

Number crunchers, on the other hand...

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN fuck i hated stats. numbers just dont interest me :/

I went into the wrong field because i love numbers. Since i play with excel frequently, I get the chance to mess around with alegbra from time to time. Me likes doing that very much. I like the fact that math has a correct answer that is verifiable.

quote:

Originally posted by jerZ07002 if i remember my undergrad stats class correctly, a population of 500 is substantial enough for statistically significance.

Statistically speaking, sure. But consider this was an online "survey" administered by Harris Interactive. Was the survey distributed through chain e-mails? Perhaps it was in the form of pop-up ads on an aol link. Maybe it was a paid survey at a survey site. All of these scenarios definitely indicate bunk to me. People that use aol, aren't smart enough to not click on pop-up ads, respond to chain e-mails or need an extra $5 by filling out surveys so that they can afford their next McDonald's combo meal probably believe in a great deal of other things, too. This sort of target crowd also lapped up The Da Vinci Code.

If the goal of this survey was to indicate any percentage of US population having a particular inclination in beliefs, I don't think that the internet is truly an effective (read: scientific) medium to do so, especially considering all of the extraneous variables no doubt interfering with the accuracy of a "study".

quote:

Originally posted by jerZ07002 I went into the wrong field because i love numbers. Since i play with excel frequently, I get the chance to mess around with alegbra from time to time. Me likes doing that very much. I like the fact that math has a correct answer that is verifiable.

Then you'de love my spreadsheets.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On O lawds, a week-long survey with less than 2,200 participants!

Dude... that sample size would give you a + or - of 2.13% 19 times out of 20... that's pretty good.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On this was an online "survey"

There is the real problem.

quote:

Originally posted by Moral Hazard There is the real problem.

It depends on the methodology. If the sample is self-selecting (i.e. no attempt was made to produce a representative sample) then we can pretty much dismiss the results out of hand. If steps were taken to produce a representative sample (which must be difficult on-line, admittedly) then the fact that it was an on-line survey shouldn't necessarily count against its reliability.

From what I've seen before, though, these numbers are roughly commensurable with other surveys done on the subject (some of which I posted in this thread).

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade It depends on the methodology.

no mater how you filter the respondents the fact remains that they are not randomly chosen from the population (by it being a voluntary on-line survey you've filtered out people that do not use the internet or people who are not inclined to take the time to complete on-line surveys)... therefore you cannot generalize to the US population by this survey; rather, you can only generalize to the population of persons who have internet access and the inclination to complete on-line surveys regarding their views on religion, superstition, and science.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.