TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- This is just going too far...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by woscar on Dec-16-2008 18:48:

This is just going too far...

https://www.beatport.com/en-US/html...435/halcyononon


Posted by Acton on Dec-16-2008 18:52:

Re: This is just going to far...

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
https://www.beatport.com/en-US/html...435/halcyononon



I'm sure we have heard worse.


Posted by Sadface on Dec-16-2008 18:56:

At least its 2 years old now.


Posted by woscar on Dec-16-2008 18:56:

Not only did he RAPE "Halcyon+On+On", he is fucking selling it as his own. I seriously doubt Orbital gave permission for this


Posted by washout on Dec-16-2008 18:57:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
Not only did he RAPE "Halcyon+On+On", he is fucking selling it as his own. I seriously doubt Orbital gave permission for this


then how can he do it?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Dec-16-2008 19:07:

quote:
Originally posted by washout
then how can he do it?

Fingers crossed?


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Dec-16-2008 19:09:

This song is actually named after me, not that other one by that one band or whatever.


Posted by Sadface on Dec-16-2008 19:19:

quote:
Originally posted by washout
then how can he do it?

Yeah seriously. Half of the sample is practically lifted straight from the original. They probably had a similar arrangement to what Laurent Garnier had w/ funkagenda.

Plus, all this "oh noez, he's selling at as his own" nonsense needs to stop. It's a cover. Musicians have been labeling covers this way for decades. As long as the other group gave permission and writing credits were given out appropriately there is really nothing wrong. Granted, on beatport you can't see the liner info to know who has the writing credits, but as this track is professionally released by a real label I have to assume that everything is reasonably in order. I mean, they didn't even change the name. It's not like they're trying to fool anybody.


Posted by bas on Dec-16-2008 19:55:

It's not terrible, just unnecessary.


Posted by MeLLyMeL on Dec-16-2008 20:01:

I'd like a stop order in the classic remake world.

I know it won't happen cuz I know of atleast 1 more coming up ;\


Posted by hasbone on Dec-16-2008 20:06:

quote:
Originally posted by MeLLyMeL
I'd like a stop order in the classic remake world.

I know it won't happen cuz I know of atleast 1 more coming up ;\


Which one?


Posted by enydo on Dec-16-2008 20:07:

rape rape rape rape rape


Posted by MeLLyMeL on Dec-16-2008 20:09:

quote:
Originally posted by hasbone
Which one?
sorry - can't say.


Posted by denys envy on Dec-16-2008 20:18:

quote:
Originally posted by MeLLyMeL
sorry - can't say.


then just tell your man not to do it. jeez.


Posted by MeLLyMeL on Dec-16-2008 20:22:

quote:
Originally posted by denys envy
then just tell your man not to do it. jeez.
haha he doesn't do anything as it is.. I would never let him do something like that. haha

It's def someone else.

I will rebump this thread once it is out.


Posted by physe on Dec-16-2008 20:52:

quote:
Originally posted by MeLLyMeL
sorry - can't say.


Never heard of that song before =)


Posted by leebates1986 on Dec-16-2008 20:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Sadface
Yeah seriously. Half of the sample is practically lifted straight from the original. They probably had a similar arrangement to what Laurent Garnier had w/ funkagenda.

Plus, all this "oh noez, he's selling at as his own" nonsense needs to stop. It's a cover. Musicians have been labeling covers this way for decades. As long as the other group gave permission and writing credits were given out appropriately there is really nothing wrong. Granted, on beatport you can't see the liner info to know who has the writing credits, but as this track is professionally released by a real label I have to assume that everything is reasonably in order. I mean, they didn't even change the name. It's not like they're trying to fool anybody.


exactly, like the fixation 'ripoff', dumb fucks need to realise things once in a while


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-16-2008 21:10:

Compared to some of the updated remixes we've heard, this one is practically genius. I think it's quite good.


Posted by leebates1986 on Dec-16-2008 21:11:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Compared to some of the updated remixes we've heard, this one is practically genius. I think it's quite good.


yeh, its one of those classics that shouldn't be touched, but, he hasn't totally raped it like some other people do with classics, not bad at all


Posted by l�cid on Dec-16-2008 21:16:

can we just take a moment to laugh at the artwork for the release?


Posted by miamitranceman on Dec-16-2008 21:30:

quote:
Originally posted by leebates1986
yeh, its one of those classics that shouldn't be touched, but, he hasn't totally raped it like some other people do with classics, not bad at all


+1

Version 1 is not that bad.


Posted by whiskers on Dec-16-2008 22:08:

Oh. I was hoping this would be a deadmau5 thread.


Call me when Joel remakes Belfast. He should do it just to piss everyone off.


Posted by bas on Dec-16-2008 22:41:

quote:
Originally posted by l�cid
can we just take a moment to laugh at the artwork for the release?



XETON RECORDS!! It looks like something from The Lawnmower Man.


Posted by Ted Promo on Dec-16-2008 22:52:

quote:
Originally posted by enydo
rape rape rape rape rape



Posted by Chimney on Dec-16-2008 23:25:

Wow. Where do these shit-"producers" pop out from?


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.