TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Why do some people begin to find trance boring?
Pages (7): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 10:13:

Big Ears Why do some people begin to find trance boring?

Recently I've been thinking on this particular matter, which I'd like to hear your opinions on. The reason for those thoughts to appear in my mind has been the awfully many people always raving on about trance being dead and so on.

Recently, some people I know have changed to listening to house and minimal techno rather than trance. Perhaps this is the place to make clear that I'm not in either the house/techno or the pure trance category. I love trance and progressive trance. But house (especially progressive and tech) and minimal and funky techno can be great as well. I seldom use only one of these genres in a DJ mix as well, as I like exciting, non-generic music and mixing Back to the question. When I ask why those friends of mine stopped listening to trance (all sorts, not only uplifting) and turned to house and minimal techno instead, the answer often is "the trance scene has turned to something I don't like anymore and so on". Now what I think is: Well, I realize the trance scene has changed. But it doesn't help turning to genres that are just as (maybe even more) predictable as trance. Maybe it's not the content of the music that has evolved into something bad, perhaps those people just search for something else in music?

Things can't be revolutionary or evolving all the time, they also weren't back in "the good old days of trance".


Posted by TranceOwnsLol on Jan-06-2009 10:19:

I don't know how minimal can be more predictable than trance.


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 10:22:

I didn't really mean predictable then. Replace it with "simple and hereby "boring", as some people say trance is or has become".


Posted by Damerchi on Jan-06-2009 10:35:

minimal would make mozart turn over in his grave


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 10:47:

I'm NOT looking for a flame war here (I like minimal as well as I already stated once). Please be serious, people.


Posted by Damerchi on Jan-06-2009 11:08:

the big trance djs ie Tiesto, have been largely commercialized, dettering people who want to listen to and be apart of an underground movement.

and I dont hate all minimal, some of its badass, but it can get redundant as balls, and really shitty


Posted by Damerchi on Jan-06-2009 11:08:

the big trance djs ie Tiesto, have been largely commercialized, dettering people who want to listen to and be apart of an underground movement.

and I dont hate all minimal, some of its badass, but it can get redundant as balls, and really shitty


Posted by Chimney on Jan-06-2009 12:16:

How long have you been listening to trance? 1-2? 3 years at most?

Well, if you had followed the movement and evolution of trance, you would have noticed how a certain underground-club sound turned into a popy vocal cheese track that you hear on radio. It's amazing really how this music style which was meant to be underground, hypnotic and dark turned to the very thing that you hear on the radio.

What's even more strange is that many time, the bounderies between trance and other music genres, such as pop, are being wiped out, leaving the listener with a bad taste and new comers with a WRONG impression of what trance is and most important used to be.
I, personally have been in the scene for quite some time now and I've seen how the sound evolved, from creativity to dull uplifting (which, by the way seems to be exactly what you need to get signed with a major label this days, just another uplifting/melodic crap) and to other radio-infused pop.

Listen to these:
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=TxvpctgU_s8

and

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=EK8K8J1BnHw


So tell me....do you listen to trance?


Posted by Havoc21 on Jan-06-2009 12:57:

Mmm... first one, yes. Second one, no, I find it extremely boring.

Actually, around where I live, I have never once heard anyone tell me trance is dead. It's alive and kicking as far as I can tell. It's even sometimes favored at roll parties over house. That's an accomplishment, methinks.


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 13:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Chimney
How long have you been listening to trance? 1-2? 3 years at most?


Since 1999 actually. Bought my first vinyls in the beginning of 2000.

quote:

Well, if you had followed the movement and evolution of trance, you would have noticed how a certain underground-club sound turned into a popy vocal cheese track that you hear on radio. It's amazing really how this music style which was meant to be underground, hypnotic and dark turned to the very thing that you hear on the radio.

What's even more strange is that many time, the bounderies between trance and other music genres, such as pop, are being wiped out, leaving the listener with a bad taste and new comers with a WRONG impression of what trance is and most important used to be.
I, personally have been in the scene for quite some time now and I've seen how the sound evolved, from creativity to dull uplifting (which, by the way seems to be exactly what you need to get signed with a major label this days, just another uplifting/melodic crap) and to other radio-infused pop.

Listen to these:
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=TxvpctgU_s8

and

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=EK8K8J1BnHw

So tell me....do you listen to trance?


What is wrong with a music genre changing? I still think there are loads of underground trance music nowadays. But first I'd like to hear what "classic" track you'd call underground in particular, in order to define what you mean by underground. As trance isn't being played in mainstream radio anywhere that I know of!

The last track you posted is cool, and yes In and out of love is a disgrace to trance music. But don't you think anything after that second track you posted was creative?

For instance, what about : http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZzD7rjDqdU&feature=related ?

How do you define creativity in trance music?

According to you, trance IS dead, or what do you think? If so, did the big parties ruin it? Did DJMag's top 100 DJ list ruin it? Did Armin's radioshow ruin it?


Posted by djkopernikus on Jan-06-2009 14:14:

When i listen new tracks, i many times wait new things to occur. Its just, this will not happen. The formula of the track is always the same, many sounds are always the same, beats are always the same. I bet there is also different sounds which you can use, so why artists doesn't do it?

Im not really enjoying listen new tracks, but im happy when i found something different. Also, it sickens me when i read those tracklists where same tracks are rolling 10000 times.


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jan-06-2009 14:26:

Re: Why do some people begin to find trance boring?

quote:
Originally posted by THE_MARSBAR


Things can't be revolutionary or evolving all the time

But they are.


Posted by Barachem on Jan-06-2009 14:39:

For many here it's just being a kind of hipster, it's hip to loath trance and criticize it's producers for being unimaginative.
For others it's a case of not liking the current sound of trance and the borification and popification of their beloved genre.
I can understand the first, but condemn it.
The second i also understand, i too hate much of the pop-trance around and the trance that mimics stuff that has already been done too much.

Yet i still believe that trance is very much alive and kicking.
I still hear new and original trance coming out, although it's drifting in a sea of worthless shat.
But isn't this true for any music style?
Gems adrift in seas of shat...?
I just happen to like trance more than any other style, even though my definition of trance is somewhat different than that of many people.
For me the trance of olden days is mostly not interesting enough because it's more hypnotic than harmonically melodic.

James Holden?
Oh, i found this gem by clicking around, i absolutely love this track:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=fWgrK...feature=related


Posted by Chimney on Jan-06-2009 15:03:

quote:
Originally posted by THE_MARSBAR
Since 1999 actually. Bought my first vinyls in the beginning of 2000.



What is wrong with a music genre changing? I still think there are loads of underground trance music nowadays. But first I'd like to hear what "classic" track you'd call underground in particular, in order to define what you mean by underground. As trance isn't being played in mainstream radio anywhere that I know of!

The last track you posted is cool, and yes In and out of love is a disgrace to trance music. But don't you think anything after that second track you posted was creative?

For instance, what about : http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZzD7...feature=related ?

How do you define creativity in trance music?

According to you, trance IS dead, or what do you think? If so, did the big parties ruin it? Did DJMag's top 100 DJ list ruin it? Did Armin's radioshow ruin it?


There is nothing wrong with a music genre to change, but to change for the better, and do not misinterpret me, there were many creative tracks at those times and even today. No, I'm not giving the "oomgg trance iz dead" card, but it's popularity has sky-rocketed that the amount of idiots and unexperienced people listening to "trance" is amazing. For instance, I was once passing in a mall while "Going Wrong" was on radio and a couple of teenage girls we're saying "Gosh love this track etc". Trance isn't only a music-style, it's an entire culture, an entire culture spawned for the club, not to be played on radio. For that there is POP music.

I do not have anything against evolution and I myself was once a fan of uplifters - in my opinion that's what's so great about it, the variations in trance are amazing, everything from psychedelic to uplifting et cetera, and they all fall under the same genre. But it's too excessive, and that's where the problems lies. If you make an uplifter, then your friend wants to make an uplifter. People do not take things into their own hands, do not experiment, and that's why we have so many uplifting traks right now - because it's a bulletproof way of gettin signed by a big label such as Armada or Blackhole Recordings, labels bent on consumption, on traffic and making money.

You asked me about the big parties. My theory about it is that back in the days, the good days when Tijs and Armin produced good solid tracks, the scene wasn't as big. However, now that there are so many new producers bringing tracks, in order for them to maintain their producer/DJ superiority they have to do something extra. Making anotber uplifter doesn't take out of the crowd. That's the reason why Armin and Tiesto keep on remixing all these Justin Timberlake and so on. They have to do something extra to be ahead of the others - and of course, labels such as Sony BMG will give the remix parts to a guy that scored #1 or #2 on the "prestigious" DJ mag list.

Armin, Tijs and Above & Beyond have made different camps in which they have strongholded the scene by the balls (talked about this in previous posts as well). If you as a producer make something, you need to send it to them, to gain publicity. In this way Armin is spinning your record on Ibiza while you sit at home listening to your track on live stream or something. Markus Sch�ssow once said "Trance isn't about talent, it's only politics" (I'm no fan of him, but it was a good quote).

Creativity is a hard, long, debateable subject. Even if there are tracks in all the genr�s I do not like, I appreciate the style it was made, the work put into it, the master, the way certain parts fit with eachother, the whole package.

So do not blame your friends for sticking with techno, it's all we have left as it seems.


Posted by Mr Game+Watch on Jan-06-2009 15:10:

If you ask me in previous years what my favorite genre of music was in previous years, I would have either answered trance or progressive house without hesitation, depending on my current mood... but now I will just answer either prog or funky house, this was probably the first year I became seriously disillusioned with trance and what was going on with it, I've found very few trance songs in 2008 I actually enjoyed ("Hybrid Harm", "La Guitarra", and "Fake Awake" being the only that come to mind) - keep in mind I'd consider stuff like on Anjunadeep progressive and not strictly trance.

Here's what got to me:

-Over commercialization of the music, I know trance was heading this way but it hasn't been nearly as blatant as it was this year.
-Songs that sound like commercialized pop, First State bootlegs of the Plain White Tees (a band that's played on adult contemporary stations for Christ Sakes), Snow Patrol remixes, Going Wrong, etc. I didn't mind "Anthem" when it came out but that song was the beginning of the end for trance.
-Trance events getting even shittier in NYC. Every time I go to see a big name trance jock, the crowd is packed with guidos and perverted old Asian men. Even Ferry Corsten, who in previous years typically had a medium-sized but devoted crowd at his show, was packed this year with trash. The crowd for Armin has gotten uncontrollably bad, from previous years.
-Raping and pillaging of classic songs I grew up with. "Carte Blanche" being the perfect example, and Richard Durand, Cosmic Gate, Sean Tyas, Marcus Schossow being the main culprits.
-Too many songs sounding like templates, using the same structure/breakdown, same sounds, and really similar riffs. I blame bedroom producers trying their hardest to make uninspired songs that will get played on ASOT. Along with Armin pimping songs from the usual cookie-cutter producers like Aly and Fila and Filo and Peri.

I'm not the world's biggest minimal fan by any means, but the last thing you can say about the genre is that it's predictable. I haven't really found any other genre where I could go from absolutely loving one song and finding another song dull as dogshit.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-06-2009 16:18:

"All the excitement that I felt in the mid-eighties, when I came across white labels in Chicago, and all the excitement I felt when people began doing drug-riddled events in Britain, which were later called "raves," but at that time were just drug-riddled events, you know, is gone. I feel there's just formalization, commodification, assimilation -- all the things that were the enemy in the seventies are back with a vengeance and it doesn't excite me. I was excited by music in the sixties because it was sexy, rebellious, and everyone hated it. It confused even me. I'd never come across it before, and I didn't know what the next sound was going to be. Adding to this appeal was the fact that often I couldn't go out and buy it anywhere. I couldn't see it on television and it wasn't in magazines, except scare stories saying it was destroying civilization. I liked that, you see. I think that's what we're supposed to be doing. We're supposed to scare everyone. We're supposed to try and find things that are sexy. We're supposed to feel confused and exhilarated and to have experiences we never had before. We're not meant to get jaded. We're not meant to know the ruling peer group's approved mode of dress or how to dance to it in advance. The expected is the enemy. When I woke up one morning and realized I knew what the flyers for the raves would look like and what software was used to do the graphics and that there would be Hindu deities on the back, even the choice of typefaces and how long it was going to last. When I even knew all the DJs and what they were going to play, and I knew the people who did the light show, and I knew exactly what videos they were going to use I thought, "Why do I go? Why on earth would I go to this?" "So it's on a beach...big deal. You know, I can go to a beach and take drugs anyway. I don't need to go and deal with 10,000 people who do not think, you know?" The joy of true creativity is the exploration of the unpredictable. At the point that creative energy becomes fully predictable and formularized, the flickering spirit of the divine is extinguished and camouflaged conservatism takes over, fed by the desire of many to be safe within the familiar."

- Genesis P-Orridge (from Modulations: A History of Electronic Music, 2000)


Posted by woscar on Jan-06-2009 17:50:

You can only listen to the same ideas at 135+ bpm for so long.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-06-2009 18:13:

quote:
Originally posted by woscar
You can only listen to the same ideas at 135+ bpm for so long.

Why does the BPM make a difference? Listening to the same ideas again and again is boring at any speed...


Posted by Guest on Jan-06-2009 18:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr Game+Watch

-Trance events getting even shittier in NYC. Every time I go to see a big name trance jock, the crowd is packed with guidos and perverted old Asian men. Even Ferry Corsten, who in previous years typically had a medium-sized but devoted crowd at his show, was packed this year with trash. The crowd for Armin has gotten uncontrollably bad, from previous years.


The cracked out Asians have always been an issue in NYC. Half the dancefloor at Club Exit was asians. If you walked through there they did not treat you nicely. This goes back to when I started going there in 2000. From 2001 to 2003 they were a problem at Sound Factory. Hanging in the bassbins completely obliterated.

Its not that they are worse, its that you're less tolerant of a substandard party as you get older


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 18:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Chimney ...


Good points I might have to agree with you on some of it.

I don't blame them, as I already said, I like techno very much myself. But I just don't think trance is THAT bad. Yes, the generic stuff you mention is bad, but if one is willing to dig through pile after pile of shit, good stuff will be found. IMO.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on Jan-06-2009 18:44:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
- Genesis P-Orridge (from Modulations: A History of Electronic Music, 2000)


I love Throbbing Gristle. If people knew what Genesis looked like, they'd probably be less inclined to listen to his actually remarkable insight.

But it's interesting to think about - image truly is almost as important as the music at times, even if it shall always be second-place. What is the image of trance anymore?

More interesting is the timeframe in which genres flourish. Every musical "movement" and style goes through transitional periods that appear to have patterns truly inextricable with what has become the new standard for "mainstream". Not to imply what is and isn't underground, as that's such a dicey term in the first place, but music, just as politics, experience times of conservativism and liberation - periods where harkening back to the "good old days" (aka rehashing old shit) is popular, as opposed to periods where experimenting and progressing is what's popular. Of course, "what's popular" is not to imply "what's good", as that is entirely subjective, and even unpopular sounds can cause a shift in the paradigm just as the paradigm can cause a shift in the sounds. It's really quite an amorphous concept, but almost every type of creative endeavor goes through similar shifts.

Electronic dance music in particular is suffering from a really harsh shift as it is not only relatively young when considering the scope of audio as entertainment, but it was also a 'movement' of sorts that represented both a political and an escapist apolitical aim, burning extremely bright but for a very short period of time. People grow older, the world changes, people change with it, the sound must also change. In an equally escapist sort of nostalgia though, conservativism rehashes 'old sounds' as said generation wishes to re-live a past that could never truly happen again, well, not for them at least. But the genre was one practically built on rebellion and youth and progression and lights; the magic of first experiences. It will come back though, it always does, but will the people who claim it's dead ever see it alive in the way that they remember? Doubtful.

And so, people seek different sounds, ones that are fresh and new to them, getting caught up in yet another movement destined to die down for a time and re-light when it's often too late to effectively garner the attentions of the same generation. But that's the human experience: a new generation gets to discover these same sounds for the first time, and be in awe.


Posted by basd on Jan-06-2009 19:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Barachem
James Holden?
Oh, i found this gem by clicking around, i absolutely love this track:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=fWgrK...feature=related

You must have been doing an awful lot of clicking around to find a gem like this.


Posted by elFreak on Jan-06-2009 19:25:

because sooner or later you realize that those imaginary apples you keep trying to pick do not exist.


Posted by THE_MARSBAR on Jan-06-2009 19:30:

Keep those thoughts coming, it's interesting to hear what you think.


Posted by Adam420 on Jan-06-2009 19:40:

Well personally I didn't get bored with the scene as I was never a part of it, it's just that shit started sounding the same and I realized I need to change things up. And I also started listening to progressive house which I like a lot more.


Pages (7): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.