TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Pre or Post...
Pre or Post...
Can someone please explain when to use a Send in Pre position instead of Post?
tks my friends
It depends on the effect you�re trying to achieve.
Use pre fader to let the send be unaffected by the fader value.
I normally just use post fader 
Re: Pre or Post...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cristianokeller Can someone please explain when to use a Send in Pre position instead of Post? tks my friends |
derail, this is exactly what I do here in Logic 8 to send the signal to a bus... And also put the fader volume to 0 and mute it... Yes I realy see that it's Pre "Fader" when I do this 
But, I need to know more of the Pre when sending to efects like reverb, delay... I need to know in examples the real advantages to use it instead of Post...
Have you tried sending something to a reverb pre-fader, just to see what it sounds like? its up to you if u wanna use pre or post, just try and it see what happens?
I find it handy for "fx" like stuff, saves using another instance of a reverb unit on a seperate track - just use one of the reverbs u already have on one of your return tracks, switch the channel to pre-fader and adjust the send level & channel level to taste
course it doesnt have to be a reverb, just whatever u like......
As evo8 said, reverb is one application. If you wanted a sound to be 100% wet, with no dry signal coming through, prefader's one way to do it.
Of course, you could route the sound's channel straight through to the reverb send - the reverb on the send bus is usually set to 100% wet, so it would achieve the same result.
I can't remember off the top of my head the example my live sound teacher gave for when you'd use prefader. It made sense at the time.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.