TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- joe biden vs. electronic music
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Max Thomson on Jan-11-2009 20:18:

joe biden vs. electronic music

for you all obamanites who think the second coming is upon us, just remember the rave act:

"The RAVE Act which threatens to squash live music and free speech was passed in 2003 when it was tacked onto an unrelated child protection bill. In 2004 there were two additional pieces of legislation considered - the CLEAN-UP Act and the Ecstasy Awareness Act - that threatened to widen the laws to prosecute anyone who holds an event and fails to prevent illicit drug use. Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) forced the controversial legislation commonly known as the "RAVE" Act through both houses of Congress as an attachment to an unrelated child abduction bill. The "RAVE" Act was passed despite the fact it did not have a public hearing, debate or vote in Congress. "

http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/raveact/

stay tuned for more of the same starting 1/20/2009!


Posted by nefardec on Jan-11-2009 20:35:

Re: joe biden vs. electronic music

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
for you all obamanites who think the second coming is upon us, just remember the rave act:

"The RAVE Act which threatens to squash live music and free speech was passed in 2003 when it was tacked onto an unrelated child protection bill. In 2004 there were two additional pieces of legislation considered - the CLEAN-UP Act and the Ecstasy Awareness Act - that threatened to widen the laws to prosecute anyone who holds an event and fails to prevent illicit drug use. Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) forced the controversial legislation commonly known as the "RAVE" Act through both houses of Congress as an attachment to an unrelated child abduction bill. The "RAVE" Act was passed despite the fact it did not have a public hearing, debate or vote in Congress. "

http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/raveact/

stay tuned for more of the same starting 1/20/2009!




yeah 'cause we all know that john mccain used to be a huge acid house deejay during the first bush administration



everyone knows (or ought to know) that obama is just another cog in the machine but come on


Posted by SMC on Jan-11-2009 20:39:

Re: Re: joe biden vs. electronic music

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
yeah 'cause we all know that john mccain used to be a huge acid house deejay during the first bush administration



everyone knows (or ought to know) that obama is just another cog in the machine but come on


+1 and lol


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-11-2009 20:53:

Re: Re: joe biden vs. electronic music

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
yeah 'cause we all know that john mccain used to be a huge acid house deejay during the first bush administration

Chop?


Posted by Max Thomson on Jan-11-2009 20:57:

I know, I know, I hear ya, but its still just so insane to me how many intelligent people I meet on a day to day basis who have projected their entire value systems onto this guy. its mind control, plain and simple.

ps: I hope to hell I'm wrong, but its hard to not connect the dots when you see history repeating itself like this


Posted by nefardec on Jan-11-2009 21:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
I know, its still just insane to me how many intelligent people I continue to meet on a day to day basis who have projected their individual value systems onto this guy. its mind control, plain and simple.

ps: I hope to hell I'm wrong, but its hard to not connect the dots when you see history repeating itself like this


i know, it's disturbing to say the least. i guess one way to look at it is, the country is a democracy dominated by ignorant people who don't give a shit, so that's what we get. the minute he raises the gas tax though people are going to have a wtf moment


Posted by jupiterone on Jan-11-2009 21:06:

might just be me but how does this apply strictly to electronic music?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-11-2009 21:15:

quote:
Originally posted by jupiterone
might just be me but how does this apply strictly to electronic music?

It doesn't, technically.

The bill says that it's designed to "prohibit an individual from knowingly opening, maintaining, managing, controlling, renting, leasing, making available for use, or profiting from any place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance, and for other purpose."

RAVE stands for "Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy." And the prologue of the bill talks about "chill rooms" and the selling of glow sticks. So it does seem like they had a particular scene in mind when writing it. But I guess the authorities could use it to shut down any place that they thought might exist for the purpose of "using controlled substances."


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-11-2009 21:16:

The "RAVE Act" itself did not actually pass. Another act with similar content was passed about a year later, though.


Posted by d-miurge on Jan-11-2009 21:21:

They'd rather outlaw glowsticks.


Posted by Bren-F on Jan-11-2009 21:32:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles

RAVE stands for "Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy."


You'd think that Raves are some sort of mad cult event where people are brainwashed into taking drugs...

It's all about the taxes!


Posted by RebeL9 on Jan-11-2009 22:23:

*yawn* those yankees with all their acts. omg lol


Posted by DJ Eco on Jan-11-2009 23:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
I know, I know, I hear ya, but its still just so insane to me how many intelligent people I meet on a day to day basis who have projected their entire value systems onto this guy. its mind control, plain and simple.



I don't know anyone whose vote for Obama was as a result of putting all their eggs in one basket, in their hope that he'd allow raves and open drug use lol...

While I love the electronic dance music scene, most of the parties that get shut down damn sure have a reason to be, whether idiots on GHB fighting each other, or some other kind of irresponsible drug overdose.

On one hand, I resent the increasing Puritanical way this administration has transformed things like nightlife and "fun". But then I travel and go to some clubs in other countries where you see 14 year olds wacked on drugs on the same dancefloor as 50 year olds snorting coke on the tables, and it's a little nuts. I hated it when I was 16, but I'm kinda happy that some clubs are 18+ to get in, and most are 21+, because I don't know if I'd enjoy going out as much if I lived in Prague or Bucharest or Milano, surrounded by kids making fools of themselves doing hard drugs.

But yeah, there's two extremes, I wish there was a midpoint that our country could somehow balance between us letting loose and having fun, without having to worry about a place getting shut down for it.


[/endrant]


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-11-2009 23:35:

Most of the crackdown on nightlife happened during the Clinton administration. "Wild young people on drugs" are a favorite target for moral panic on both sides of the political aisle. The fear this whips up always seems to work on parents, because after all, who wants their kids to end up dead or brain-damaged? Better that they be doing a bit of underage drinking at a friend's place than dancing in some old warehouse while out of their mind on pills of dubious composition, right?


Posted by DJ Eco on Jan-12-2009 01:02:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Most of the crackdown on nightlife happened during the Clinton administration. "Wild young people on drugs" are a favorite target for moral panic on both sides of the political aisle. The fear this whips up always seems to work on parents, because after all, who wants their kids to end up dead or brain-damaged? Better that they be doing a bit of underage drinking at a friend's place than dancing in some old warehouse while out of their mind on pills of dubious composition, right?




You pretty much summed it up. As much as I liked Bill Clinton, it all happened during his terms. I guess everything was going so well in society that they had to focus on the stupid pointless shit, nothing better to focus our country's money or resources on.

I was having a discussion like this with a friend actually, over a bowl of some sour diesel. It's going to be interesting what the scene turns into in the next years. Every shitty situation in history or society has brought about a crazy important cultural, musical, artistic, and expressional revolution.

Follow me here, but with criminality going up, can our cities' cops focus on shutting down our clubs and enforcing stupid laws like underage drinking and smoking indoors? Everything's going out of business, houses and buildings are getting foreclosed. In man's darkest hours, man has always come back with some kind of uprising that goes hand-in-hand with art, music, and drugs. Think the hippies of the 60s, the "roaring 20s", the punk scene of the 80s. I'm not saying what's happening is or is going to be at that level, but I'm just making a point.

We're going to see some interesting stuff in electronic music soon. The past few years have brought a huge amount of SMALL clubs to New York City, and a shutdown of all the big ones. Pop music itself has become very electronic and dancey. People who listened to hip hop and gangster rap are suddenly finding themselves enjoying Justice, David Guetta, and Kanye West dance remixes. I'm seeing it slowly with my own eyes a huge group of people getting into the music in the past few years. Maybe good things are coming


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-12-2009 01:42:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Follow me here, but with criminality going up, can our cities' cops focus on shutting down our clubs and enforcing stupid laws like underage drinking and smoking indoors?

Is criminality going up, though? My understanding is that it peaked around 1990 and has gone down ever since, in the U.S.

quote:
Everything's going out of business, houses and buildings are getting foreclosed. In man's darkest hours, man has always come back with some kind of uprising that goes hand-in-hand with art, music, and drugs. Think the hippies of the 60s, the "roaring 20s", the punk scene of the 80s. I'm not saying what's happening is or is going to be at that level, but I'm just making a point.

You know, I've thought of things like this before, but I'm not so sure about how well it fits. What were the "dark hours" preceding the '60s? I guess the Vietnam War was concurrent with them...

quote:
We're going to see some interesting stuff in electronic music soon. The past few years have brought a huge amount of SMALL clubs to New York City, and a shutdown of all the big ones. Pop music itself has become very electronic and dancey. People who listened to hip hop and gangster rap are suddenly finding themselves enjoying Justice, David Guetta, and Kanye West dance remixes. I'm seeing it slowly with my own eyes a huge group of people getting into the music in the past few years. Maybe good things are coming

I hope so. Most of my friends are dance-music heads, though, so I don't really have a good perspective on where "general" trends are heading...


Posted by Barachem on Jan-12-2009 09:35:

So, did Bush do anything against parties and clubs?
He oughta be a small minded person in that area too...


Posted by Imagin on Jan-12-2009 11:03:

Technically the RAVE act did pass.... Biden and Co just edited the words that made it single out EDM scenes but its still just as fingerpointing as it was with "glow sticks" and "chill rooms".

I wrote a 14 page paper on this for my Writing class in college. (BTW I would show the paper... but to be honest this is the internet and I can see someone using it for their course and pasting their name on it as their work... hence why I wont honor a request to read the paper. Sorry)

Basically the bill wouldnt pass on its own so he added it as an amendment to the "Child Protection Act". This is right after Elizabeth Smart was found so no congressman was going to stop and look at everything attached to the bill. (You would be shocked if you read some of the bills that are must passes. The child protection act has everything from the Rave Act to a raise for senators attached on it....) The catch-all is even if you do everything in your power to stop any illegal drugs from getting into the club if people are caught on the premises with an illegal drug the owner of the establishment or the land owner falls under criminal punishment for having illegal substances at a place under their control.

Its a normal protocol to put personal agendas into must past bills. Joe is one of the worst people in congress to put his own personal views into law however he can. He single handedly went on a complete offensive against any club in DC (my hometown) that played electronic music. Namely Nation and Edge. He was the instrumental reason for Buzz leaving Nation. There was a giant rift between Electronic and Hip-Hop club goers as you could go to a hip hop club and get weed and coke like it was another drink at the bar but all the heat was on electronic music because "no way can people be listening to this without drugs".

Basically Biden saw something he didnt like and made it law. Gotta love how congress does business......


Posted by DJ Eco on Jan-12-2009 12:42:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Is criminality going up, though? My understanding is that it peaked around 1990 and has gone down ever since, in the U.S.


Well, from what I do know about, murder and crime rate has been rising since 2003 or so, in most of the big cities. While it's still relatively low, I know from personal experience that the NYPD has been slashed in half since then, so they are trying to do more with less. I don't know if the same goes for everywhere, but I have read that a lot of the heartland cities are going down the shitter. For example, places like St. Louis and Memphis, etc., are experiencing a huge influx in crime. Another article I read talked about the crime in some of those big housing developments and suburbs. They can't sell thousands of home in one development, so people break in, graffiti, squat, sell/do drugs in them. I don't know how relevant this all is, but I think it's interesting lol...


quote:
You know, I've thought of things like this before, but I'm not so sure about how well it fits. What were the "dark hours" preceding the '60s? I guess the Vietnam War was concurrent with them...


I could be wrong here as well, but I think things were so clean and perfect and prosperous in the 50s (like our 90s, relatively speaking), that something had to give. That was the Vietnam War. When your brothers, sons, fathers, and neighbors are being sent to fight a war where many will die, a certain outrage comes as a result. Thus, in my opinion, some of the best music, art, film, and overall explosive movement came about. Some of it was fueled on drugs, some of it was fueled by the outrage of the War. When things are bad, changes are made. The Civil Rights fight was born out of this 1960s mess. What will be born out of ours? I know I started this conversation in terms of just music, but hey, it changed form haha...


quote:
I hope so. Most of my friends are dance-music heads, though, so I don't really have a good perspective on where "general" trends are heading...


I could be wrong with that too. Most of my friends happen to have an open mind with music, art, films, drugs, etc., so I may not exactly be 100% correct with my view on the "pulse" of the nation as a whole. But that's just my opinion


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-12-2009 12:48:

Maybe we could just have a thread where we watch the Billboard top ten / top twenty or something?


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jan-12-2009 13:54:

quote:
Originally posted by d-miurge
They'd rather outlaw glowsticks.

What would Krypton do then?


Posted by hooknife on Jan-12-2009 13:59:

Re: joe biden vs. electronic music

quote:
Originally posted by Max Thomson
for you all obamanites who think the second coming is upon us, just remember the rave act:

"The RAVE Act which threatens to squash live music and free speech was passed in 2003 when it was tacked onto an unrelated child protection bill. In 2004 there were two additional pieces of legislation considered - the CLEAN-UP Act and the Ecstasy Awareness Act - that threatened to widen the laws to prosecute anyone who holds an event and fails to prevent illicit drug use. Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) forced the controversial legislation commonly known as the "RAVE" Act through both houses of Congress as an attachment to an unrelated child abduction bill. The "RAVE" Act was passed despite the fact it did not have a public hearing, debate or vote in Congress. "

http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/raveact/

stay tuned for more of the same starting 1/20/2009!


You're just mad that your piece of shit party/candidate LOST. Go away sore loser and prepare for GREATNESS!


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jan-12-2009 14:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Barachem
So, did Bush do anything against parties and clubs?
He oughta be a small minded person in that area too...

I don't know. I doubt he did much, given the overwhelming focus on anti-terrorism and the Iraq war. It's usually during the peaceful and stable times that issues like youth drug use get the most attention...


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jan-12-2009 15:26:

Meh.


Posted by epdarks on Jan-12-2009 19:06:

obama/biden are going to be so swamped with real issues, the rave act will disappear into the background.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.