TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Gaming Forum
-- Mirror's Edge (PC) impressions
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-15-2009 04:52:

Mirror's Edge (PC) impressions

As I usually do when I buy a new game, I'm posting my impressions here. ME(PC) was officially released on the 13th, but for some reason, none of the stores I've visited seemed to have any copies, nor did most of them seem particularly optimistic about receiving a shipment. Anyways, I finally managed to get my hands on one earlier this afternoon.

Now, if you bother reading my posts at all in this forum, then you'll know that I'm not particularly fond of EA. Their recent catalogue has been a series of shallow disappointments. For some reason, though, I felt like giving EA one more chance; After all, something as awesome looking and as original as Mirror's Edge can't possibly go wrong, right? I was pretty sure this would be the last EA-published game I would buy in many, many years, or possibly ever. But if this one managed to impress me, then I might reconsider that position.

So you've got your mediocre-looking asian chick with the annoying tattoo on the cover, but you probably already knew that. The box makes a point of mentioning that it contains a "bonus music CD" of some of the worst music you'll ever hear. Now, maybe it's just me, but I get rather annoyed when I end up paying for shit I don't want. The cost of printing that disk could've gone towards shaving 5 bucks off the retail price. Or at least, give me something I do want, like a bonus DVD with porn.

I start installing the game when I notice that it's taking a freakishly long time, and that my DVD drive is making odd noises. I recognized those sounds from splinter cell's shitty securom protection making my optical drive cry, and ultimately crashing (Yes, this game, unsurprisingly, contains some invasive DRM and a limited number (5) of installs). Indeed, this one ended up crashing too. It took three attempts at installing and a little over an hour before I could get the game working at all. Note to self; use steam next time.

So I finally get to start playing. I go through the infamous tutorial, which, really wasn't half as bad as everyone was making it out to be. Atmosphere is something this game achieves remarkably well. The graphics are pretty (U3 always is). It never really takes you out of first person view or force you to watch long and tedious cutscenes (which happens to be my biggest pet peeve), so that'll get it some free w00t points from me. Most of your objectives are given through radio transmissions. No major interruptions, and the little storytelling there is was snuggly fit in the loading screens. That means, in a general sense, the game flows pretty well. Sound design is especially good. You can hear appropriate gasps, breathing or impact sounds fitting whatever you're doing in-game. The control scheme is simple and intuitive, everything runs smooth, no problem there.

The first of my problems started after I noticed that I was missing ledges I couldn't see because the gratuitous amount of post-processing was blurring them out into an annoying and unnessessary bloom. After a while it got so annoying that I ended up turning the game's graphics settings down to minimum, which, ironically, made everything look better and more readable. Another minor graphics related issue worth mentioning is that the PhysX physics emulation (which is somewhat of a selling point for the PC version) makes my otherwise flawless framerate slow down to a crawl at 1-2 FPS. I haven't had any problems with physics emulation in any other U3 based game in the past. Oh well, disabled that too.

On to the gameplay itself: In case you're not familiar with the concept, ME is supposedly based around the idea of having you jump from rooftop to rooftop, performing acrobatic moves in the process and attempting to preserve momentum. It's a fairly refreshing and original idea. Now, when the game actually lets you do this, it's a whole lot of fun. The problem is, it rarely ever does. You get to do your best spiderman impression for a good 30 seconds at a time before you're forced into annoying and poorly designed jumping puzzles or an atrocious combat system that amounts to little more than a bunch of random and unreliable quick time events.

Speaking of the combat; The game was advertised as discouraging the use of guns, focusing instead on disarming enemies or simply avoiding them. This was supposed to be another one of the game's "selling points". In reality, the melee system is incredibly clumsy, and most of the time, you'll just prefer picking up guns and shooting. In fact, most of the combat situations are designed in such a way as to discourage running away. Whenever you try something original, the game will find some way to punish you for it. A lot of these sequences even force you to take down enemies, preventing your progress until you do so.

(it should be noted that this can be avoided altogether by playing the "race" mode... except that all the maps appear to be initially locked out until, I would imagine, you've been forced to suffer through them at least once)

Now, back to the roof-jumping part, supposedly the good part of ME; that has some serious issues as well. The game provides you with some guidance by highlighting certain objects in red, a little gimmick they call "runner-vision". This works for the most part, but occasionally you'll run across 'false cues' where the game is explicitly or inexplicitly telling you to do something that will ultimately make you fall to your death - over and over again. You'll try to grab pipes only to have your character's hands go right through them. Even more confusing is that often, critical objects that should be highlighted aren't, causing you to hesitate and die (again). It seems almost like a cruel joke where the game efficiently conditions you to respond to the stimulus, then proceeds to torture and torment you with it. Some later parts of the game are soaked in red paint. It's like the designers just gave up and decided "fuck it, let's make everything red!"

To amplify this shittiness tenfold, they don't let you save. Ever. Instead, you'll have to rely on a system of cruel checkpoints; usually placed before frustrating bits, but rarely after, ensuring that you'll go through the frustrating bits as often as possible.

What's incredible in all this is that, despite the fact that you'll probably die every 30 seconds, the actual game, aside from all that random and unpredictable killing of the player, is fairly unchallenging. It almost exclusively relies on random deaths or bad and frustrating design choices to give an impression of difficulty. It ultimately boils down to breezing forward through easy street until you randomly and inexplicably die, then reloading from the last checkpoint and going through the same bit over and over again until the game arbitrarily decides to let you live.

Top all that with a 'meh' storyline, a plot twist you can see coming from a mile away, a mediocre soundtrack and you've got a package not really worth getting. This game gets most of it's points from originality and atmosphere (arguably, the only things it does well), but not much else. I really wanted to like this game. I still think it's a fantastic idea, and I would love to see the concept executed well, but this just isn't it.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-15-2009 04:56:

why'd you buy it after all the mediocre console reviews? but thanks, im glad you made sure im not gonna waste my money. seriously, 2009 is gonna suck for PC gamers (unless of course you want to make sweet love to blizzard, which i dont).


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-15-2009 04:57:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
why'd you buy it after all the mediocre console reviews? but thanks, im glad you made sure im not gonna waste my money. seriously, 2009 is gonna suck for PC gamers (unless of course you want to make sweet love to blizzard, which i dont).


Yeah like console reviewers are worth a shit.

*gives blizzard a blowjob*


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-15-2009 05:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Cpt.Cocaine
Yeah like console reviewers are worth a shit.


haha! when they're fairly unanimous i tend to listen


Posted by Fledz on Jan-15-2009 06:03:

Heh, I was going to wait until it hit the bargain bins anyway. No way in hell a game like this deserves full price.

PKC - There's plenty of great games on the horizon for PC this year


Posted by Philby on Jan-15-2009 06:17:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
why'd you buy it after all the mediocre console reviews? but thanks, im glad you made sure im not gonna waste my money. seriously, 2009 is gonna suck for PC gamers (unless of course you want to make sweet love to blizzard, which i dont).


DAWN OF WAR 2

street fighter iv
fear 2
empire total war
mass effect 2
dragon age

surely there will be some gold in that list at least??


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-15-2009 06:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
PKC - There's plenty of great games on the horizon for PC this year


im not finding too many :/

quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
DAWN OF WAR 2

street fighter iv
fear 2
empire total war
mass effect 2
dragon age


some of those ill have a look at but they do not excite me. aliens (and i found out there's also an aliens RPG) is pretty much the only game that im salivating over atm.


Posted by chach on Jan-15-2009 14:56:



Seriously no offense but you are an idiot if you thought this game would be good.


Posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY on Jan-15-2009 15:11:

I downloaded the demo for PS3 and screwed around with it for 10 mins. Got bored jumping over buildings and mimicking that other whore you're supposed to follow, hehe. I think it would make a better B movie than game.


Posted by Mr Game+Watch on Jan-15-2009 15:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
DAWN OF WAR 2

street fighter iv
fear 2
empire total war
mass effect 2
dragon age

surely there will be some gold in that list at least??


I can't even imagine trying to play SFIV on PC...it's the type of game you play with friends on a big screen TV.


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-15-2009 16:04:

quote:
Originally posted by chach


Seriously no offense but you are an idiot if you thought this game would be good.


I thought it would be playable at least.


Posted by Capitalizt on Jan-15-2009 20:40:

All I want in 2009 is some extra character enhancements for Team Fortress 2. Mirror's Edge is in my PS3 queue at Gamefly though. It should make a good 2-3 day rental.


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-15-2009 21:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
should make a good 2-3 day rental.


It's more like a 5 hour rental, actually.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-15-2009 22:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr Game+Watch
I can't even imagine trying to play SFIV on PC...it's the type of game you play with friends on a big screen TV.


but i have friends and a big screen tv! plus, it'll look and run better


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-15-2009 23:06:

And you get to use any controller you want.


Posted by Yohan on Jan-15-2009 23:12:

really salivating over dawn of war 2 and empire: total war

has anyone played sins of solar empire btw? any good?


Posted by Ghost Raver on Jan-16-2009 00:44:

Thanks for the long ass post.

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
fear 2

Babbabaa. I still like to laugh at the first "FEAR", which in my opinion had a hell of a lot better demo than the whole full game was. The demo was fun, I played it a lot and just shot and kicked the enemies around and when I installed the full game... well, I didn't like it very much.


Oh, I don't play games very much these days so I don't even know which games are coming out this year...


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-16-2009 01:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Ghost Raver
Thanks for the long ass post.


Hey, it's what I do. *fresh pose*

quote:

Oh, I don't play games very much these days so I don't even know which games are coming out this year...


http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=1062

http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=1060


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-16-2009 02:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Cpt.Cocaine
And you get to use any controller you want.


and, when you're over the button-mashing, you can go and play something truly spectacular, like forged alliance. no game shows the distinct superiority like supreme commander. seen the 360 version? poor microsoft.


Posted by Mr Game+Watch on Jan-16-2009 14:19:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
and, when you're over the button-mashing, you can go and play something truly spectacular, like forged alliance. no game shows the distinct superiority like supreme commander. seen the 360 version? poor microsoft.


Wait, SF4 is a button masher?

Try to button mash against anyone of slight capability at the game and see how far that gets you. The last SF game, at least, was one of the deepest 2D fighters ever made.


Posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY on Jan-16-2009 16:58:

Hell yea, there's a new Wolfenstein coming!


Posted by CONNERMAN2000 on Jan-16-2009 17:12:

I'll admit it, I actually got a kick out of the PS3 demo. Maybe I didn't play it enough to notice the flaws.

Though I will agree that buying this for full price is something not worth doing.


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on Jan-16-2009 18:35:

quote:
Originally posted by CONNERMAN2000
I'll admit it, I actually got a kick out of the PS3 demo. Maybe I didn't play it enough to notice the flaws.

Though I will agree that buying this for full price is something not worth doing.


If I'm not mistaken, the demo is the tutorial + the first level. That would be by far the best part of the game. Those particular areas are relatively bug free in comparison, much better designed and such. It seems to be a common consensus that the demo was deceiving and not really a good representation of the full game.


Posted by KiNeTiC ENeRgY on Jan-16-2009 20:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Cpt.Cocaine
If I'm not mistaken, the demo is the tutorial + the first level. That would be by far the best part of the game. Those particular areas are relatively bug free in comparison, much better designed and such. It seems to be a common consensus that the demo was deceiving and not really a good representation of the full game.


yea most demos do include the best parts of the game to make the sales, and when u buy it, you're disappointed.


Posted by CONNERMAN2000 on Jan-16-2009 22:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Cpt.Cocaine
If I'm not mistaken, the demo is the tutorial + the first level. That would be by far the best part of the game. Those particular areas are relatively bug free in comparison, much better designed and such. It seems to be a common consensus that the demo was deceiving and not really a good representation of the full game.


Well that's pretty deceiving. Thanks for the review, I'll know what to expect out of this game.


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.