TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- 10 TB DVDs
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
10 TB DVDs
| quote: |
| A BLANK disc that can store two million photos and 100,000 songs will be available within 10 years, Melbourne researchers predict. The team at Swinburne University of Technology yesterday revealed it had used nanotechnology to record information in five dimensions. Today's discs record in two or three dimensions. This means DVDs could potentially hold up to 10 terabytes of data -- equal to 10,240 gigabytes, whereas the average disc now can store 4.9 gigabytes. Dr James Chon, co-author of the research, which will appear in Nature magazine, said the new disc could hold 100,000 songs instead of fewer than 100, and the equivalent of 2000 movies. Professor Richard Evans, from the CSIRO's Molecular and Health Technologies division, said the technology would first be used in medicine, finance and government sectors. "Things like medical imaging, with MRIs that generate huge amounts of data, will be where this is introduced first," he said. The research was conducted by Swinburne University of Technology's centre for Micro-Photonics, supported by a discovery grant from the Australian Research Council. |
Does Australia suck?
I think we have just proven why we do not.
p.s this article doesn't say that they have already created a 1.5TB disc, so the 10TB thing is not bullshit like a majority of these articles usually are.
This will happen sooner than 10 years.
100 000 songs instead of 100? WTF? 100 songs fit on a CD, idiots.
ummmmmmm .flac songs
look at you up there, in you christmas hat and sunglasses so noone can see your .flacy eyes. shame on you, mr president!
I read 12TB the other day, not 10. 
http://technews.am/conversations/ubergizmo/12tb_dvds_could_be_in_the_works
http://www.technama.com/2009/12tb-storage-disc-demonstrated/
A standard DVD holds 4.7GB not 4.9. Double-Layer Holds 8.5GB. JonSun is absolutely right as well, should be within the next 5 years, really.
EDIT: Also, I was under the impression data back up via discs were on the way out. Flash media is the future, IMO. Though, movies I suppose will still be disc based.
I'd rather have 10 TB DVDs than Ton TB DVDs.
FUTURE SOUNDS...MAGIK!
wo 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cmay119 EDIT: Also, I was under the impression data back up via discs were on the way out. Flash media is the future, IMO. Though, movies I suppose will still be disc based. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cmay119 A standard DVD holds 4.7GB not 4.9. Double-Layer Holds 8.5GB. JonSun is absolutely right as well, should be within the next 5 years, really. EDIT: Also, I was under the impression data back up via discs were on the way out. Flash media is the future, IMO. Though, movies I suppose will still be disc based. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rasidel Slika Im under the impression that disc-based backup is more reliable and longer-lasting than Flash.. I know Ive had more than a few flash-based gadgets fail - namely flash drives - meanwhile my DVD's are fucking tanks. If I had to choose where to back up 4.5GB of data right now, I'll choose a DVD every time. Flash-based media seems to be a temporary thing, for easier access. And again, it also seems volatile. For archiving, I see disk-based here to stay. |
Agree with everything you said. Definitely agree that redundancy along with error-checking / notification would be (and already is) a glorious way to combat failure.
In terms of easy access, I agree the answer is not disc-based. But I think we are talking about 2 roles thereof, access and storage. For storage, which these DVD's would primarily be for, I think they are desirable, relevant, and here to stay. But, you would also be able to view said storage from the media directly, much like you can view DVD movies today.
And, I'm glad they are moving into 12TB, how great will it be to have ~240 full-quality movies on one disc (assuming the current maximum of 50GB per movie). Of course, this is thinking "inside the box". I'm sure this will open the door to many more space-hog type of application / utility.
What about a hard drive? any advances in that?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd What about a hard drive? any advances in that? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd What about a hard drive? any advances in that? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd What about a hard drive? any advances in that? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rasidel Slika Agree with everything you said. Definitely agree that redundancy along with error-checking / notification would be (and already is) a glorious way to combat failure. In terms of easy access, I agree the answer is not disc-based. But I think we are talking about 2 roles thereof, access and storage. For storage, which these DVD's would primarily be for, I think they are desirable, relevant, and here to stay. But, you would also be able to view said storage from the media directly, much like you can view DVD movies today. And, I'm glad they are moving into 12TB, how great will it be to have ~240 full-quality movies on one disc (assuming the current maximum of 50GB per movie). Of course, this is thinking "inside the box". I'm sure this will open the door to many more space-hog type of application / utility. |
cool vid, I could get used to that kind of firepower 
Honestly, I think a 10TB DVD-like disk is overkill, unless you want to store your entire collection of 1080p movies.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by noikeee Honestly, I think a 10TB DVD-like disk is overkill, unless you want to store your entire collection of 1080p movies. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by noikeee Honestly, I think a 10TB DVD-like disk is overkill, unless you want to store your entire collection of 1080p movies. |
| quote: |
| 640K ought to be enough for anybody |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.