TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- North Korea tests second nuclear device; Fires rockets...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Joss Weatherby on May-25-2009 05:09:

Shame / Disagreement North Korea tests second nuclear device; Fires rockets...

Heh... those little bastards.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8066615.stm

quote:
North Korea has staged a "successful" underground nuclear test, the state-run KCNA agency reports.

The agency says it was more powerful than an earlier test in October 2006.

South Korea's president immediately convened an emergency security meeting and Japan is setting up a task force in the prime minister's office.

Just hours later, North Korea appears to have test-fired a short-range missile, South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported.

Pyongyang has so far not commented on Yonhap's report.


Posted by Sunsnail on May-25-2009 05:10:

bull


Posted by nchs09 on May-25-2009 05:28:

Whats the problem with this?


Posted by junkproject on May-25-2009 05:30:

Preping for 2012.


Posted by Cpt.Cocaine on May-25-2009 05:35:

All praise our great leader for this incredible achievement!


Posted by Joss Weatherby on May-25-2009 07:54:

Russia says the test was around 20kt. That is about the same yield as the Fatman bomb dropped on Nagasaki.

Just to note, the average warhead in the US arsenal ranges in the 250-500kt range, with multi-megaton air dropped bombs held in reserve.


Posted by Rasidel Slika on May-26-2009 00:56:

quote:
Originally posted by junkproject
Preping for 2012.

this


Posted by stevebutabi on May-26-2009 01:14:


Posted by yukii on May-26-2009 02:56:






Posted by Halcyon+On+On on May-26-2009 16:04:

Rearry, what's with those grasses?


Posted by knowhope on May-26-2009 16:53:

I see no problem with this.

The Americans have nuclear bombs, the Indians have nuclear bombs, the Russians have nuclear bombs, the Chinese have nukes and many others.

Is it right for the capitalist countries to judge a comminist society just because it has nukes? Not fair in my opinion.

Basically, you have a bigger gun, well i'm going to get a bigger one. Even thought they wont be as big as the US.

By the way, Iraq didn't have nukes, look what happened to them. Afghans doesn't have nukes.

As you can see, the police of the world are trying to manage other countries. They could have done the samething with North Korea, but they wont, because they have nukes.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on May-26-2009 17:04:

It's North Korea's flagrant violation of policies as well as flagrant display of nuclear weaponry that make people understandably leery. In a perfect world, every country would follow international law all of the time, so we could all feel safer in our means for mutually assured destruction, but war doesn't reconcile with reason, and the less nukes in the least amount of hands, the better.

No, it's not fair at all. But nothing truly is.


Posted by knowhope on May-26-2009 17:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
It's North Korea's flagrant violation of policies as well as flagrant display of nuclear weaponry that make people understandably leery. In a perfect world, every country would follow international law all of the time, so we could all feel safer in our means for mutually assured destruction, but war doesn't reconcile with reason, and the less nukes in the least amount of hands, the better.

No, it's not fair at all. But nothing truly is.
To demand a full stop on the North Korean nuclear project is absurde. Especially when it's comming from a country with over a few thousand nukes.

It's just incrediblely stupid how the US are trying to police the world and try to invade every country because of their "power hungry" feeling.


Posted by Halcyon+On+On on May-26-2009 17:11:

If the US were not doing it, another country would, I promise you. And no, that doesn't make it 'right' by any moral standards, but might makes right, more often than not.

Control is the province of nations, and there shall always be one profiting from the steady demise of another.


Posted by knowhope on May-26-2009 17:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
If the US were not doing it, another country would, I promise you. And no, that doesn't make it 'right' by any moral standards, but might makes right, more often than not.

Control is the province of nations, and there shall always be one profiting from the steady demise of another.
The only reason why are complainning about this situation is because of the massive propaganda from the UN and the US.

I agree that this sort of situation is inevitable, but i dispise the fact that people will blurt out how North Korea are going to destroy the world while there own country owns trillions of dollars in arms.

They pretty much have the lattest technologies for there army and marines. Nothing compared to the Canadians, where out troops need to be scared shitless when flying on a chinook or there little van looking humvee.


Posted by Rasidel Slika on May-26-2009 17:18:

well they have one less nuke now don't they

/optimism


Posted by yukii on May-26-2009 17:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Rearry, what's with those grasses?



Posted by Joss Weatherby on May-26-2009 17:58:

quote:
Originally posted by knowhope
The only reason why are complainning about this situation is because of the massive propaganda from the UN and the US.

I agree that this sort of situation is inevitable, but i dispise the fact that people will blurt out how North Korea are going to destroy the world while there own country owns trillions of dollars in arms.

They pretty much have the lattest technologies for there army and marines. Nothing compared to the Canadians, where out troops need to be scared shitless when flying on a chinook or there little van looking humvee.



Its more of a fear of a totally hegemonic dictator that has in the past not leaned with the most stable of ideas. Also the fact that the country is still technically at war with its southern neighbor and has millions of troops and artillery pieces poised at its border.

Also, the main rationalization for limitation is that they do not want to start an arms race with South Korea; or worse Japan jumping in and building their own nuclear stockpiles. A nuclear armed Japan would be the most destabilizing thing the region could imagine.


Posted by SteelWolf on May-26-2009 19:19:

Personally, this is no threat.

I think that peaceful discord and UN Sanctions will keep us all safe. Obama was so right to leave our nation defenseless by shutting down the missile defense program. I mean, who needs that kind of stuff when TALK is soooooooooo effective. That and the mighty UN.


Fuckin wanker.


Posted by Joss Weatherby on May-26-2009 19:29:

quote:
Originally posted by SteelWolf
Personally, this is no threat.

I think that peaceful discord and UN Sanctions will keep us all safe. Obama was so right to leave our nation defenseless by shutting down the missile defense program. I mean, who needs that kind of stuff when TALK is soooooooooo effective. That and the mighty UN.


Fuckin wanker.


Uh... he didn't shut it down, he cut parts of its funding. Also, Aegis using SM-3 is already in place and more proven than THAADS is.

Besides that, North Korea is at least a decade out before it has a missile deliverable nuclear warhead, and even then it wouldn't be small enough to get to any part of the 50 states, except maybe the very tip of Aleutian islands...

In Japan and sK they have access to PAC-3 systems that can shoot down most anything these days.


Posted by nchs09 on May-26-2009 19:34:

quote:
Originally posted by SteelWolf
Personally, this is no threat.

I think that peaceful discord and UN Sanctions will keep us all safe. Obama was so right to leave our nation defenseless by shutting down the missile defense program. I mean, who needs that kind of stuff when TALK is soooooooooo effective. That and the mighty UN.


Fuckin wanker.
Fuuuuuuuuukkkkkkkk... its the douchebag who steals from the dead.


Posted by StalkerElmo on May-26-2009 21:02:

Life as a house.


Posted by knowhope on May-26-2009 21:16:

Well it seems that we can all agree that this nuclear test from the North Koreans are of no threat.


Posted by Joss Weatherby on May-26-2009 21:24:

quote:
Originally posted by knowhope
Well it seems that we can all agree that this nuclear test from the North Koreans are of no threat.



Its not any sort of physical threat no... but read what I said above about an arms race.


Posted by knowhope on May-26-2009 21:27:

I read about it and it's fine. Like i said before, the US has big guns and the little countries are just trying to compete. Even thought the US can bomb the fook out of the NK, i'm sure just 1 nuke from NK can make it somewhere in the US or it's allies.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.