TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Is most DJing today illegal?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jun-05-2009 15:07:

Is most DJing today illegal?

I was recently scolded for posting a link to a classic trance set over on trance.nu. The scolder said that t.nu doesn't allow any illegal activity like the sharing of MP3s, posting of DJ sets, and so on. It's pretty obvious to me that the hosting of live sets is generally illegal, since in most cases you're sharing a collection of copyrighted material without getting permission from any of the copyright owners. But that got me thinking about the more general question of DJing.

Is DJing itself usually illegal? I say "usually" because as far as I know most DJs are fairly small-time and therefore feel no need to sign up with any organizations or get broadcasting rights for the songs they play from any legal bodies or copyright owners. So they're technically "broadcasting" copyrighted material without getting any permission, and in some cases profiting from doing so when they play clubs or events -- which is illegal in most countries, right?

I'm not particularly worried about this stuff, I'm just kind of curious about the legal status of it all.


Posted by elFreak on Jun-05-2009 15:22:

clubs pay licensing fees, as do radio stations.

promo sets are a grey area, but most of the producers/labels are happier to get the free promo and won't say anything. This music is not exactly a huge money maker, so any publicity is good publicity.

ps trance.nu is for fags fag.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jun-05-2009 15:24:

quote:
Originally posted by elFreak
ps trance.nu is for fags fag.

Hey, I was just trying to expose them to something outside the "Filo & Peri / Tiesto" spectrum. But it was a fail.


Posted by elFreak on Jun-05-2009 15:26:

*take away your moog*

you obviously don't deserve it.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Jun-05-2009 15:27:

...from my cold dead hands.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0B_UZNtEk4


Posted by Stasis on Jun-05-2009 18:40:

http://msl1.mit.edu/esd10/docs/bglobe_bmi_article.pdf

That's a pretty good newspaper article on just this topic.


Posted by shotcolin' on Jun-05-2009 21:25:

thanks for the article


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-06-2009 01:00:

I think the real question is this:

What the hell were you doing at t.nu in the first place?


Posted by whiskers on Jun-06-2009 14:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
I think the real question is this:

What the hell were you doing at t.nu in the first place?


This.

Also, if not for DJs, most EDM producers would be out of 'jobs'.

Hehehe, 'jobs'.


Posted by PezCore on Jun-06-2009 21:44:

well, if you look on your CDs, it shows a warning saying that any public performance is prohibited, so yeah, I guess it is illegal technically


Posted by DJ Blitzkrieg on Jun-07-2009 06:32:

Trance.nu is just retarded. If your not making any profit from it and you've modified it to make it your own, ie a mix, then it's not illegal. Plus no one except trance.nu cares about posting up mixes lol.


Posted by woscar on Jun-07-2009 07:24:

Beatport and other digital music retailers like Junodownload, Audiojelly, and DJ Download are marketing and selling the tracks contained in their sites as "music for DJs". The whole purpose of those tracks is to be played out in public.


Posted by euphoria on Jun-08-2009 12:11:

Re: Is most DJing today illegal?

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles posting a link to over on trance.nu.


That was your first mistake lol You think our mods are tough? They take it to the next level


Posted by Domesticated on Jun-08-2009 13:07:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Blitzkrieg
Trance.nu is just retarded. If your not making any profit from it and you've modified it to make it your own, ie a mix, then it's not illegal. Plus no one except trance.nu cares about posting up mixes lol.


That's not true.

If you're broadcasting something without the owner's permission then it's against the law, regardless of whether or not you are doing it for profit.


Posted by ziptnf on Jun-08-2009 13:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
That's not true.

If you're broadcasting something without the owner's permission then it's against the law, regardless of whether or not you are doing it for profit.

Doesn't purchasing a song automatically give you the right to play it however you want?


Posted by Domesticated on Jun-08-2009 14:35:

quote:
Originally posted by ziptnf
Doesn't purchasing a song automatically give you the right to play it however you want?


No. It's just like when you buy a DVD and they have the disclaimer at the start warning you against public screenings (OIL RIGS!).


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-08-2009 15:02:

Re: Re: Is most DJing today illegal?

quote:
Originally posted by euphoria
That was your first mistake lol You think our mods are tough? They take it to the next level

We have mods?


Posted by RebeL9 on Jun-08-2009 15:07:

The reason why trance.nu are so harsch when it comes to posting mixes are because they are sucking off Tiesto and Armin (I.e. receiving free CDs for review purpose etc). Imagine Tiesto getting angry at them. That would be a nightmare. Loosing his support! The death of trance! This is complete bullshit.


Posted by MichaelBoogerd! on Jun-08-2009 15:59:

trance.nu are trying to set up a morally higher ground whereby their forum is not a filesharing site. Whatever benefits this brings is rather pointless, considering its membership base is filled by all the teenagers alternatively logging into the countless blogs to download music anyway.

However, the t.nu owners can sleep comfortably at night - knowing their site is legit? lol


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-08-2009 16:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
That's not true.

If you're broadcasting something without the owner's permission then it's against the law, regardless of whether or not you are doing it for profit.

That is right - even though it's a commonly accepted policy in the EDM "scene" (sic) that labels don't care about DJ mixes being shared it still isn't legal.


Posted by basilisk on Jun-09-2009 16:47:

DJ mixes are "fair use" in my opinion. But I'm not a lawyer nor will I fight it in court. The fact is that sharing mixes is an accepted part of EDM culture.

I have an amusing trance.nu anecdote to share. A couple of years ago when I began promoting free and legal music licensed under the Creative Commons I was shut out from posting on their forum for file sharing. Initially they said it doesn't matter what the licence appears to be; they wanted written authorization from every artist plainly stating that they were cool with having their music posted online. Mind-boggling. It's like no one can imagine that a producer might want to share their music freely to reap the promotional benefits. I haven't had any trouble since winning that particular war at least, but still... what a strange set of attitudes and policies.


Posted by WebmaN on Jun-09-2009 20:04:

they just don't want shit on their hands. so they draw a sharp line. if members still want mixes they go to here or the mixingbowl or whatever. it's not that if you can't get it at t.nu, you can't get it anywhere else..


Posted by basilisk on Jun-10-2009 12:54:

What good is trance.nu anyway? Seems like a lot of Armin/Tiesto fan boy stuff and little else.


Posted by RebeL9 on Jun-10-2009 13:28:

yeah people there seem to think that Tiesto invented trance sometimes around the year 2000.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.