TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- What Key Detection Software Is Most Accurate


Posted by lenieNt Force on Jun-19-2009 18:45:

What Key Detection Software Is Most Accurate

I searched the forum and was surprised there was no threads on this.

I'd like a discussion on what software has the best key detection algorithm available, a great tool to the art of harmonic mixing. As far as I know, there's 4 programs that offer a key detection functionality to date. They are: Mixmeister, MixShare's Rapid Evolution, Mixed In Key, and VirtualDJ.

What software has the most accurate and most reliable key detection? Which of these programs would you recommend? Are there other softwares that I have not mentioned?

This is the only thread I've found that compares (three of) these programs, but the latest results are from 2007. We need up to date benchmarking!

http://www.mixingonbeat.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2268

What key detection software has the highest accuracy rate in the midst of 2009?


Posted by notnotelfreak on Jun-19-2009 18:48:

your ear.


Posted by lenieNt Force on Jun-19-2009 19:15:

quote:
Originally posted by notnotelfreak
your ear.

Well that depends on the ear

But you're definately right. With a piano you can easily key your tracks, but you know the deal.. It takes time. Alot.. of time, for a substantial collection of music.


Posted by Wayne_B on Jun-19-2009 19:56:

Alot of pros use "Mixed in Key" and from my own experience I'd say it works really well. I'm not sure how the competition stands up to it though..sorry


Posted by lenieNt Force on Jun-19-2009 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Wayne_B
Alot of pros use "Mixed in Key" and from my own experience I'd say it works really well. I'm not sure how the competition stands up to it though..sorry

kk thanx for answering anyway and leaving your recommendation!


Posted by nefardec on Jun-19-2009 20:50:

quote:
Originally posted by lenieNt Force
Well that depends on the ear



yeah but this is the thing

regardless of whose ear it is, all the music you have keyed with it will probably be consistent among one another

plus you might actually have to listen carefully to your records.


Posted by lenieNt Force on Jun-19-2009 21:23:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
yeah but this is the thing

regardless of whose ear it is, all the music you have keyed with it will probably be consistent among one another

plus you might actually have to listen carefully to your records.

Good point. This is also true for the different keying softwares, as I've heard they key tracks differently but respectively consistent. You should never use two different algorithms to key the music, or two different pairs of ears for that matter.

But none of the programs are 100% accurate on all songs and there will be glitches here and there within the same program also, hence it would be nice to know which has the best algorithm and the highest accuracy rate.

In the link previously posted the program that tops the list is RE2 (Rapid Evolution), with an accuracy rate of 70%. But this was in August 2007, and algorithms have developed further now.


Posted by orTof�nChiLd on Jun-19-2009 22:02:

quote:
Originally posted by notnotelfreak
your ear.


that is not key detection software


Posted by Ted Promo on Jun-20-2009 15:54:

quote:
Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd
that is not key detection software


ear v 1.0


Posted by noicuc on Jun-23-2009 15:34:

quote:
Originally posted by notnotelfreak
your ear.


+999


Or , rapid evolution does it pretty well.


Posted by ChadP MIK on Jul-03-2009 17:22:

quote:
Originally posted by lenieNt Force
Good point. This is also true for the different keying softwares, as I've heard they key tracks differently but respectively consistent. You should never use two different algorithms to key the music, or two different pairs of ears for that matter.


That is correct, different programs will most certainly give you different results.



quote:
In the link previously posted the program that tops the list is RE2 (Rapid Evolution), with an accuracy rate of 70%. But this was in August 2007, and algorithms have developed further now.


For the record we are constantly working on improving the key detection of Mixed In Key. To our knowledge we use the only key detection system that will have it's own patent (pending approval). Generally we have stayed away from official comparisons though. The entire process can be rather suggestive, and we would rather focus on helping DJs sound great.


-Chad P
Mixed In Key


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-06-2009 04:31:

quote:
Originally posted by ChadP MIK
Generally we have stayed away from official comparisons though.


yeah, because last time we checked mixed in key got trounced by one of the free programs


Posted by ChadP MIK on Jul-06-2009 15:38:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yeah, because last time we checked mixed in key got trounced by one of the free programs


I've seen those comparisons before. The test was done by the creator of one of the free programs, so I don't put much stock in the results. Keying tracks can be subjective so it's easy to skew the results any way you want. I think it's far more important how well you can mix with the results.


Posted by nrjizer on Jul-06-2009 16:28:

I find that Mixed in Key gets it wrong about 20% of the time. Usually it just gets a song confused with it's relative major/minor, or the next fifth over, but sometimes it's way way off.

Your ear is truly the best way to key tracks. Learning some basic music theory will improve your mixing by leaps and bounds, because you will be able to change keys in creative ways rather than just going by what you have your tunes labeled as. You will also learn to trust your instincts more.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-07-2009 00:00:

quote:
Originally posted by ChadP MIK
I've seen those comparisons before. The test was done by the creator of one of the free programs, so I don't put much stock in the results. Keying tracks can be subjective so it's easy to skew the results any way you want. I think it's far more important how well you can mix with the results.


If you say so. Most of us are savvy enough to recognise a ripoff when we see one.


Posted by sleepydragon on Jul-11-2009 12:20:

quote:
Originally posted by ChadP MIK
I've seen those comparisons before. The test was done by the creator of one of the free programs, so I don't put much stock in the results. Keying tracks can be subjective so it's easy to skew the results any way you want. I think it's far more important how well you can mix with the results.


either way i dont think you should have to pay for such a program


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jul-11-2009 12:27:

ear??? wtf? i can not tell what fucking note a tune is in and im known for heaving a good ear lol. i just assume all tracks are in C Minor and then transposed up and down hahaha.


Posted by Sanguis Mortuum on Jul-13-2009 16:17:

quote:
Originally posted by sleepydragon
either way i dont think you should have to pay for such a program
What? You expect people to just make you software for free? Plenty of people do give their software away for free but if someone wants compensation for their efforts who are you to tell them they should be doing it for free?



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.