TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- And now we know where Sanford has been...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Shakka on Jun-24-2009 18:37:

And now we know where Sanford has been...

Banging some hot Argentina piece of ass. It was in a different country, does it still count???

But in all seriousness--this thing didn't smell right from the get-go.

p.s. I think his wife knew all along.


Posted by HardTranceProd on Jun-24-2009 18:56:

I don't think any male of any age would pass up an opportunity to inseminate a female, unless the costs seriously outweighed the benefits. Even with huge costs, though, a one-off opportunity to inseminate a woman is such an important part of a man's reproductive success (the woman may conceive and bear his child) that he is more often than not prepared to face the costs whatever they may be.

Since we're all guys here on this forum, let's cut the bullshit and acknowledge that we'd all be ready to drop our pants at the drop of a hat if we saw a willing female in front of us.


Posted by Shakka on Jun-24-2009 19:10:

quote:
Originally posted by HardTranceProd
Since we're all guys here on this forum, let's cut the bullshit and acknowledge that we'd all be ready to drop our pants at the drop of a hat if we saw a willing super hot female in front of us.


Well, I do have a kid, and marriage and a political career are a lot to throw away. But certainly up to a certain age and being single, I probably wouldn't hesitate, though I don't think I'd want to inseminate anyone if that was my game (though I understand your biological/evolutionary argument).


Posted by The17sss on Jun-24-2009 19:20:

Re: And now we know where Sanford has been...

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
Banging some hot Argentina piece of ass. It was in a different country, does it still count???

But in all seriousness--this thing didn't smell right from the get-go.

p.s. I think his wife knew all along.


Yeah his wife knew about it 5 months ago he said. Christ, down goes another one. Do they always just think THEY are going to be the one that doesn't get caught this time? Fuckin A. I liked that guy too... so disappointing.


Posted by HardTranceProd on Jun-24-2009 19:22:

Heck, even Silvio Berlusconi, the 72-year-old Italian PM, is prepared to risk it all for having access to some babes. At his age, and at the height of his political power, he's prepared to risk it all, just for that precious chance!


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Jun-24-2009 19:23:

Welp, back to Palin 2012!

Damn latinos. Really screwin' up our country......


Posted by The17sss on Jun-24-2009 19:26:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Welp, back to Palin 2012!

Damn latinos. Really screwin' up our country......




I bet Palin won't run. I'm thinking Romney-Jindal or Romney-Pawlenty.


Posted by jerZ07002 on Jun-24-2009 19:32:

dude gets points in my book (as long as she fits within the hot stereotype).


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jun-24-2009 19:33:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Welp, back to Palin 2012!



Right on cue, too!

quote:
Palin - Huckabee 2012

Sarah Palin is the most popular (though most divisive) of the top GOP figures in the land, according to a new poll from Pew, which compared her to Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Michael Steele. This, of course, leaves out some other important GOP figures--most notably Mike Huckabee, whose strong showing in the 2008 GOP primary and continued presence on Fox News places him in the well-known category along with those four.

Here's how their favorable/unfavorables break down. Huckabee was included, along with Romney, Palin, and Gingrich, in an automated Public Policy Polling survey June 18, so I'll include his line from that survey*.

Sarah Palin:
National fav/unfav: 45/44
GOP fav/unfav: 73/17

Mitt Romney
National fav/unfav: 40/28
GOP fav/unfav: 57/18

Newt Gingrich
National fav/unfav: 35/38
GOP fav/unfav: 55/22

Michael Steele
National fav/unfav: 23/14
GOP fav/unfav: 28/14

Mike Huckabee
National fav/unfav: 43/35
GOP fav/unfav: 70/17



http://politics.theatlantic.com/200..._republican.php


Posted by The17sss on Jun-24-2009 19:37:

Romney's +12 and Palin +1 with the national numbers though... I don't care about the party numbers.

Ugh.... I don't want Palin running for prez. Sure, she can draw huge crowds everywhere she goes, and she stands for most of the same conservative values I love, but dammit, she's not ready for prime time!

Edit: she annoys me when she tries too hard by using the stupid term "Joe six-pack" all the time. shut up with the folksy-speak!


Posted by Shakka on Jun-24-2009 19:41:

Just sayin...


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jun-24-2009 19:44:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Romney's +12 and Palin +1 with the national numbers though... I don't care about the party numbers.


Primary comes first.


quote:
Ugh.... I don't want Palin running for prez. Sure, she can draw huge crowds everywhere she goes, and she stands for most of the same conservative values I love, but dammit, she's not ready for prime time!


Not ready? You really think that's the issue?


Posted by The17sss on Jun-24-2009 19:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Not ready? You really think that's the issue?


I'm saying that very generally. There are obviously many issues. It would kill me for a strong top-of-the ticket to try and choose her again for the VP role... he'd be fucking himself. And I just don't think she'd win the nomination for President, but I really don't think she'll try to run anyway (wishful thinking?). I'm ok with her being around to give speeches though because she can draw a crowd. But uh... I kinda hope it stops there.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jun-24-2009 19:49:

And these GOP favorable numbers are from before the Sanford bombshell:



quote:
You essentially see Hispanics and �others� converging with African-Americans� dim view of the Republicans. An interesting question here is whether this is a genuine meeting of the minds, or else just an artifact of the reality that black support for Republicans is pushing up against the zero bound, so that as a sinking tide drowns the GOP boat among all racial groups, the black/non-black gap necessarily gets smaller.


http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/a...view-of-gop.php

Maybe the GOP will see a Hispanic bump now that we know Sanford loves Latinas?


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jun-24-2009 19:51:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
I'm saying that very generally. There are obviously many issues. It would kill me for a strong top-of-the ticket to try and choose her again for the VP role... he'd be fucking himself. And I just don't think she'd win the nomination for President, but I really don't think she'll try to run anyway (wishful thinking?). I'm ok with her being around to give speeches though because she can draw a crowd. But uh... I kinda hope it stops there.


Here's another area where we disagree. I literally think the world would explode if she became President of the United States. She doesn't have the gravitas, much less the intellect to handle any of the issues the President deals with daily. I'd rather move to Russia and see America from my house.


Posted by The17sss on Jun-24-2009 19:51:


Posted by jerZ07002 on Jun-24-2009 20:07:

the number of ridiculously hot girls that show up when you enter in google "argentina girls" is staggering.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Jun-24-2009 21:52:

Fox is at it again!


Posted by jerZ07002 on Jun-24-2009 22:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Fox is at it again!




what is fox doing?



i haven't read too much about this, but if he went to argentina for the weekend, and it didn't really interfere with his position, so what? It's better then buying an overpriced hooker from NJ (Spitzer) or bangin out some israeli dude (McGreevey).


Posted by josh4 on Jun-24-2009 22:55:

Amazing, only a week after Ensign admitted an affair. Is it surprising to anyone both Sanford and Ensign called on Clinton to resign after his affair? Neither of them have given up their elected seats.

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
And these GOP favorable numbers are from before the Sanford bombshell:





http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/a...view-of-gop.php

Maybe the GOP will see a Hispanic bump now that we know Sanford loves Latinas?


Yes the GOP is being polled with the lowest approval ratings ever.

quote:
By contrast, the Republican Party is viewed favorably by only 36 percent of the public, down from 51 percent three years ago, and the lowest in Washington Post polling history
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/wh...of-the-gop.html


So much for family values and sanctity of marriage.


Are we really parsing out 2010/2012 scenarios? Give me a break. A major donkey fuck-up to shift public opinion notwithstanding, I'm calling a democrat landslide right now. Bu-bye GOP..


Posted by The17sss on Jun-25-2009 01:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Fox is at it again!



oddly enough (not really), I was watching the same press conference on Fox. That was the bottom line at the beginning of the speech before he unloaded. It didn't take long for the caption to have the words "affair" and "infidelity" on it. Haha... come on man that's a momentary snapshot. And you were busting up that guy from NRO about making mountains out of mole hills?

Edit: repost, but again this shit just becomes more and more relevant with every adulturous scandal


Congressman Offers Preemptive Apology For Extramarital Affair


Posted by The17sss on Jun-25-2009 01:25:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
Amazing, only a week after Ensign admitted an affair. Is it surprising to anyone both Sanford and Ensign called on Clinton to resign after his affair? Neither of them have given up their elected seats.


Yes. So amazing it's crazy!

Ensign is scum, but Sanford will resign here very shortly, or the party will force him out according to the SC legislature.

quote:
So much for family values and sanctity of marriage.


Someone's forgetting about Paul Morrison, Eliot Spitzer, and John "give me a bastard child while my wife has cancer" Edwards. LOL are you seriously making this a partisan issue?

quote:

Are we really parsing out 2010/2012 scenarios? Give me a break. A major donkey fuck-up to shift public opinion notwithstanding, I'm calling a democrat landslide right now. Bu-bye GOP..


You're outraged that people are parsing 2010/2012 scenarios... then you call for your prediction of 2010/2012? LOLOL!!!


Posted by jerZ07002 on Jun-25-2009 01:29:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
oddly enough (not really), I was watching the same press conference on Fox. That was the bottom line at the beginning of the speech before he unloaded. It didn't take long for the caption to have the words "affair" and "infidelity" on it. Haha... come on man that's a momentary snapshot. And you were busting up that guy from NRO about making mountains out of mole hills?

Edit: repost, but again this shit just becomes more and more relevant with every adulturous scandal



Lol - I just saw that the caption labeled him a democrat. Everyone knows my political leaning, and I just don't see this as a big deal. People are hypocrits, dudes bang hot chicks when they can (especially from argentina, she must have been smoking if he flew to argentina), and they hide shit they don't necessarily want exposed. I get it that politicians have a greater duty to serve the people, but if this was a normal vacation or if he did a bloomberg and went to israel or some other place on "official business - wink" this wouldn't be an issue. I don't care about his infidelity, I applaud his ability to score what I presume is a dope latina chica. Or, maybe I'm just a scumbag.


Bottom line - if his action didn't have a real impact on his ability to execute his duties I don't think its relevant. If some real shit happened, I'm sure he has a cell phone and can coordinate on a conference call like the rest of the business world does.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jun-25-2009 01:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Sarah Palin:
National fav/unfav: 45/44
GOP fav/unfav: 73/17


are you fucking kidding me? How am I meant to respect America when Americans don�t respect themselves?


Posted by Damerchi on Jun-25-2009 02:21:

First executive order: David Letterman to guantanamo.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.