TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- RME Fireface 400 / Event Opals
RME Fireface 400 / Event Opals
Is this interface worthy of the Opals?
Firefaces aren't that good AFAIK. I'm pretty sure they use the same converters as Audiofires, so you might as well just save yourself a few coins. I think Audiofire 2-4 use the same converters as the Fireface 400, while Audiofire 8-12 use the converters in the Fireface 800.
A good option is to get a raw IO interface, such as the Audiofire 12, then get a dedicated DA for your monitors later down the track. This is an easily scaled solution, imo.
How are the opals, haven't heard of a review of them from anyone
| quote: |
| Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd How are the opals, haven't heard of a review of them from anyone |
We use several 800's at the studio and they are a superb interface - given the choice I'd take an 800 over a motu interface without blinking. The sonic quality is superior on the 800 and even thoigh it uses the same chips as the top end audiofire range (which are great by the way) it has even better architecture. Also, and most importantly the 800 has a better internal clock which greatly improves audio reproduction quality over motu.
Put it this way:
I'd be content with combining the RME 800 and the opals, but feel I'd need to upgrade using a motu or anything below.
Really for $3000 speakers, you want to be considering an Appogee Rosetta/ensemble, RME FF800, Lavry Black, Mytek, UA2192, lynx or similar grade interface. You need to leave the "prosumer" ones behind but at that level you're getting in to the whole diminishing returns thing, so it's just about working out what budget you have and what your needs are, whether it be amount of I/O, the type of connectivity, the controls, etc.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN We use several 800's at the studio and they are a superb interface - given the choice I'd take an 800 over a motu interface without blinking. The sonic quality is superior on the 800 and even thoigh it uses the same chips as the top end audiofire range (which are great by the way) it has even better architecture. Also, and most importantly the 800 has a better internal clock which greatly improves audio reproduction quality over motu. Put it this way: I'd be content with combining the RME 800 and the opals, but feel I'd need to upgrade using a motu or anything below. Really for $3000 speakers, you want to be considering an Appogee Rosetta/ensemble, RME FF800, Lavry Black, Mytek, UA2192, lynx or similar grade interface. You need to leave the "prosumer" ones behind but at that level you're getting in to the whole diminishing returns thing, so it's just about working out what budget you have and what your needs are, whether it be amount of I/O, the type of connectivity, the controls, etc. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by orTof�nChiLd I have a question for you, is it better to get a single DA converter rather than getting an interface that have both options? like is one dedicated to do a single job better than doing both? |
Cheers for the info Tom, looks like RME 800 is the way to go
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.