TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- some welcomed feedback for my track


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 01:21:

some welcomed feedback for my track

http://soundcloud.com/ompressor/new-song-mode-for-trance-tune-tech-19
just need some feedback from my producer buddies i,m pleased with the track just some final touches left to do. it's on the tribal tech side of things so any comments will be cool thanks


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 01:23:

damn soundcloud wont embed the link will work in the browser


Posted by Kismet7 on Aug-15-2009 01:48:

post it on Producer Promotion and it should embed.

Which brings up the question, why does'nt this forum have embed?


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 01:51:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kismet7
post it on Producer Promotion and it should embed.

Which brings up the question, why does'nt this forum have embed? [/QUOTE

ok so did you play the track?


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 12:08:

man 80 views and no feedback


Posted by Lucidity on Aug-15-2009 12:47:

Too repetitive Some nice sounds later in the track, but, many do not fit. The best part I would say is the breakdown. Everything leading to it, just doesn't sound right to me. Out of key? Wrong Sounds... I don't know. I think the bassline needs to change. Some of the panning is good with the hi-hats but, it lacking a bit, in the mix. Some of the sounds you choose can very well work, but, it seems you just need more practice. No hard feelings- its just my opinion.


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 13:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Lucidity
Too repetitive Some nice sounds later in the track, but, many do not fit. The best part I would say is the breakdown. Everything leading to it, just doesn't sound right to me. Out of key? Wrong Sounds... I don't know. I think the bassline needs to change. Some of the panning is good with the hi-hats but, it lacking a bit, in the mix. Some of the sounds you choose can very well work, but, it seems you just need more practice. No hard feelings- its just my opinion.
none taken i like my track the build up was ment to be diverse and strange as the hole point was to make the track moody and weird as possible i have a techno influence hence the repetitive parts in the track. thanks for the time dude


Posted by mfitterer1 on Aug-15-2009 13:55:

I'd cut it down a little bit, if it's that repetitive no way can it be almost 10 minutes. You have to either sacrifice some length or there needs to be more progression and change in the track.


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 14:10:

quote:
Originally posted by mfitterer1
I'd cut it down a little bit, if it's that repetitive no way can it be almost 10 minutes. You have to either sacrifice some length or there needs to be more progression and change in the track.
yeah when the track is finished i will round it off some more.but it was made to be that way so did you like the track?


Posted by floyd741 on Aug-15-2009 15:10:

that was weird, those vocal samples are crazy. at some parts it sounds like some weird goa and then there's like a trancey element to it and...

it was weird.


Posted by owien on Aug-15-2009 15:23:

quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
that was weird, those vocal samples are crazy. at some parts it sounds like some weird goa and then there's like a trancey element to it and...

it was weird.
haha yep i like to mix things up it was a personal track really. ive been using fl and man its hard work to get a tight production out of it. but i like my shit and with some minor changes to it it will be a good tune


Posted by DigiNut on Aug-15-2009 19:16:

The two most oft-quoted and despised new-producer responses to criticism:

That's the sound I was going for.
No shit, if it wasn't the sound you wanted then you would have made a different sound. This is the musical equivalent of "it's not a bug, it's a feature!"

It's got a few rough edges, I just need to put on the finishing touches and then it'll be awesome. (Alternate version: It just needs to be mastered.)
I know you put in a lot of effort, but those little finishing touches are about 50% of the total work, for a typical production by an experienced producer. Those of us who actually know what we're talking about do not really appreciate these things being brushed off as spit-polishing.


I don't want to be rude, because I don't see you being defensive per se, but you're also not listening to people, and that is the whole point of posting your track and asking for unbiased feedback. We already know that YOU like your own track! What matters here is how other people are reacting to it.

I'm sorry to say that the track is repetitive, discordant, and generally aimless, and you won't learn anything if you rationalize this by writing it off as "diverse and strange." The track is also muddy and in some parts shrill, and you won't improve if you brush that aside as just needing a little "rounding out."

A good tune needs at least a few elements, which you haven't provided here:
- An original hook or groove that listeners won't mind hearing several times over;
- A general musical direction, that will make listeners want to find out what happens next, so to speak. This applies to both individual elements and the overall structure.
- Smooth transitions (or very strategically placed sharp ones), in order to give some cohesion to different elements.
- A particular style that defines your sound. This is a less tangible but still critical quality, and you can't achieve it by throwing everything but the kitchen sink into the same track.

That's all I have to say in reply - take it or leave it.


Posted by sixofour.604 on Aug-15-2009 22:00:

"An original hook."

I Lol'd.


Posted by sonic dolphin on Aug-16-2009 00:14:

I am just a noob at producing but, from an inexperienced producers ear, I would have to agree with the above comments. I would suggest cleaning out the lower range sounds, especially if you are after a more tech feel. It seems to lack some identity in terms of style and it may be improved by going either a bit more techy with more layers of sparse rhythmic synth sounds/loops, or more progressive with better defined hooks that develop at least in timbre. It could be improved with more variations - something new happening at least every 8 or 16 bars.


Posted by mfitterer1 on Aug-16-2009 00:38:

Digi Nut may have come off abrasive but it's the truth. We have all been there. You've been working your ass off and you're ready to share your first track with your peers and hoping for a good response to validate your work and it doesn't come.

It's only a small let down. It should open your eyes slightly. You may not understand what they are saying so the best piece of advice is look at one/some of the inspirations of your style you're trying to create in the track and listen and see differences between your track and theirs. It will come. Just keep plugging. You'll get there.


Posted by owien on Aug-16-2009 00:52:

quote:
Originally posted by mfitterer1
Digi Nut may have come off abrasive but it's the truth. We have all been there. You've been working your ass off and you're ready to share your first track with your peers and hoping for a good response to validate your work and it doesn't come.

It's only a small let down. It should open your eyes slightly. You may not understand what they are saying so the best piece of advice is look at one/some of the inspirations of your style you're trying to create in the track and listen and see differences between your track and theirs. It will come. Just keep plugging. You'll get there.
thanks for the vote of confidence having spent the best part of a day pulling it apart i found the parts it needs. i'm not worried about loosing face with the rest of ta as I'm more then happy with my with what i do. just thinking outside the box


Posted by johncannons1 on Aug-16-2009 01:36:

i know this sounds tight..
but its almost 100 mb's lol

make it a 320 kbps that ways its like 20mbs lol more ppl may download it.

thats like 5 tracks in one (size wise lol)



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.