TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- RIAA now wants to SUE individual MP3 traders..article inside...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
RIAA now wants to SUE individual MP3 traders..article inside...
taken from http://msnbc-cnet.com.com/2100-1023-941547.html?
Record labels hell-bent on strangling unauthorized music copying on the Internet are considering widening their legal efforts to include lawsuits against individuals, according to industry sources.
The move comes as the industry wrestles to contain the effects of peer-to-peer software applications that allow consumers to link their PCs into massive cooperatives where millions of music titles can be found and copied for free. Despite legal rulings that have helped the labels shut down some of the most popular providers of file-swapping services, such as Napster, such networks have grown unabated.
The labels have not yet decided to sue individuals, industry insiders said. However, it's clear executives are seeking a way to make consumers think twice before uploading or downloading music via the Net. They're also discussing funding a larger education campaign. But some believe the most prolific file-traders should be held legally accountable.
"The subject is on the table," said one industry executive who requested anonymity. "The idea would be to discourage people. Clearly there have been no consequences yet."
The move toward suing individuals, first reported in The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, would mark a substantial deviation from the path that record labels and movie studios have previously taken in their battles against online piracy.
In the past, labels and movie studios have targeted only companies that have profited--or intended to profit--by the rise in online piracy. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has successfully sued Napster and Audiogalaxy; it is continuing lawsuits against Madster (formerly known as Aimster), StreamCast Networks, Grokster and the company that created Kazaa. The industry group has said it intends to add Sharman Networks, which now operates the Kazaa network, to that list.
So far, the lawsuits have been filed for "contributory infringement," which means the labels have charged that companies such as Napster were knowingly aiding and abetting the real music-copiers. But for any of those suits to fly, it means the labels and the judges have acknowledged that the actions of individual file-swappers themselves were direct copyright infringement, and therefore potentially illegal.
Industry insiders say any lawsuits would likely target people who were offering large numbers of files for download by others. They cite a common belief in the industry, initially sparked by a study of Gnutella users conducted by Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), that only about 10 percent of file-swappers provide about 90 percent of the content available through networks such as Kazaa.
Discouraging this 10 percent of "providers" would go a long way in reducing the amount of content available through file-swapping networks, industry insiders say.
Previously, record companies, movie studios and software companies have pursued individuals though their Internet service providers. Connecting to most peer-to-peer networks exposes a computer user's Internet address, which can be traced back to an ISP. Copyright owners have sent thousands of letters to ISPs complaining about subscribers' copyright infringement over the past year, resulting in warning letters to the subscribers, and in some cases cancellation of accounts.
The hard-rock band Metallica cited unnamed individuals in its lawsuit against Napster, and the band's attorney said he would likely add specific individuals later. That tack was later dropped, however.
All of this action has had only minimal effect on the total volume of file trading, however.
According to recent estimates by The Yankee Group research firm, close to 7.9 billion audio files were traded in 2001 by computer users 14 years and older. By 2004, they expect that number to rise to more than 11.4 billion.
Record industry insiders say there is no timetable for when potential suits against individuals would be launched.
LOL...hahahhahahahaahaha....funny
They call suck my Jumbo�
Re: RIAA now wants to SUE individual MP3 traders..article inside...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tiesto14 taken from http://msnbc-cnet.com.com/2100-1023-941547.html? They cite a common belief in the industry, initially sparked by a study of Gnutella users conducted by Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), that only about 10 percent of file-swappers provide about 90 percent of the content available through networks such as Kazaa. Discouraging this 10 percent of "providers" would go a long way in reducing the amount of content available through file-swapping networks, industry insiders say. |
Re: Re: RIAA now wants to SUE individual MP3 traders..article inside...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tiesto14 makes u wonder...they will be going after release groups???? |
livesets are legal if they're not released on a album but recorded from radio
spreading official releases by record company's like CDs, Singles, Vinyls on mp3 is illegal...
This is not that funny at all. The warez scene recieved a big hit after FBI finished their recent campaign and arrested quite a few of the groups' members.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by xtr3m This is not that funny at all. The warez scene recieved a big hit after FBI finished their recent campaign and arrested quite a few of the groups' members. |
wow that was a long article so i didnt read it all but the part i read was funny
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tiesto14 i just think its funny that in all the chaos in this world that these peoples efforts on MP3s is kind of pathetic... kiddie porn is more of an issue then MP3s yet u hear more about the banning of MP3s then u do about that...kinda sick |
just one thing to say:
SUE ME!
jus a question...do DJ like Sasha, Digweed, etc, and producers such as Max Graham, Steve Lawler, etc care about their stuff gettin ripped by groups???...i mean...this is a great way to get their stuff heard...and if they really wanna spread the music...its also a good way to do it...but yea...they do lose money...
iono...they'd be wastin their time suein individuals...too many of em...
How can they sue a bunch of underage teenagers?
honestly cant see y they wouldnt...
what we need is some big corporation with infinite funds to help us in our fight.
since that's never gonna happen...... 
seriously tho', if they try and sue individuals, they aint gonna get far.
Re: RIAA now wants to SUE individual MP3 traders..article inside...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tiesto14 taken from http://msnbc-cnet.com.com/2100-1023-941547.html? According to recent estimates by The Yankee Group research firm, close to 7.9 billion audio files were traded in 2001 by computer users 14 years and older. By 2004, they expect that number to rise to more than 11.4 billion. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by jploveparade livesets are legal if they're not released on a album but recorded from radio spreading official releases by record company's like CDs, Singles, Vinyls on mp3 is illegal... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DanceresortUK You will find live sets are illegal too, any thing recorded can be listened to once and then must be got rid of, unless of course you contact the radio/TV station and ask them if you can keep the recording. distributing Radio sets is the same as full albums BUT record companies dont care about Radio sets because the are not selling them so their little doller signs are not affected. Hope this helps.... |
RIAA CAN SUCK MY POLISH DICK!!!!!!!!
FIGHT THE SYSTEM!!!!
Bounce
| quote: |
| Originally posted by TiestoInTheMix i'll make sure that i call radio 1, 538, and others and ask them if i can keep all of my livesets. oh yeah, i'll also delete all of my illegal mp3s from my hdd. on other thought, MY ASS i will! |
!!! RIAA
Can't do shit. Thye can't tell wether I ripped it from a CD or downloaded it.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Are the RIAA the stupidest people ever? They may as well bang their head against a brick wall rather than trying to stop mp3 sharing.
So while the third world are starving and in need of food and any money the RIAA are spending millions on sueing individuals (if they do imagine how clogged up the courts will be! They will never get through all the cases and how the hell do they know who you are anyway from online? Theya re pathetic!) so that the greedy record companies who care only about money and not the music can continue t bathe in cash. And artists like Metallica can fuck off!
I can't wait till the RIAA goes
"Ahhh shit we can't win they're too many of them! We give up. Now what else can we waste our dumptrucks of money on?"
That day I will dance and sing and have a merry old time. But I doubt it will happen.
Sueing individuals. Good luck wankers! Stupidest thing I've ever fricken heard!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trance_n_dance Can't do shit. Thye can't tell wether I ripped it from a CD or downloaded it. |
riaa can kiss my arse
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Philby I think they're more worried about the fact that you are letting other people download it for free, not necessarily if you did. |
Let's fucking sue them for sueing everyone all the friggin time
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.