TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Who broke TA?


Posted by DigitalMP on Dec-03-2009 23:18:

Who broke TA?

And just in case it's only the titles that are all messed up, who broke TA?


Posted by Wurm on Dec-03-2009 23:20:

Worm Popper Time to party like it's

1969.


Posted by Wurm on Dec-03-2009 23:21:

Worm Popper

That was over quickly.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Dec-03-2009 23:21:



lol!


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Dec-04-2009 00:02:

sorry...I pushed F5 too many times


Posted by v-vaughn on Dec-04-2009 00:40:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyCrew
lol!


haha very nice


Posted by DigiNut on Dec-04-2009 01:10:

I broke the dam!


Posted by chinamon on Dec-04-2009 01:15:

its always del so there is no point in asking.


Posted by VERTiG0 on Dec-04-2009 02:09:

You might say... He hit the "DEL" key! AHAHAHAHHAAahah.




aaaaahah.

ah.


Posted by Sorin.16v on Dec-04-2009 02:17:

pwnmededemed?


Posted by Jem_hadar on Dec-04-2009 05:11:

quote:
Originally posted by VERTiG0
You might say... He hit the "DEL" key! AHAHAHAHHAAahah.




aaaaahah.

ah.


oH boi.


Posted by DeleteFromUsers on Dec-04-2009 05:25:

December 31st, 1969 at 23:59:59 is second -1 in Unix time (or POSIX time). A lot of computer systems use the unix epoch (Jan 1st 1970) as a time reference, and all times recorded in the database are recorded as the number of seconds since the epoch.

The variable used for time on the forum must have been set to -1 briefly instead of being dynamically generated by the database's records.

Now you know!


Posted by DigitalMP on Dec-04-2009 05:59:

It would have been better if they were all Dec 21, 2012.

And I heard the movie sucked. So, 69 ftw...


Posted by Miss. S on Dec-04-2009 06:03:

quote:
Originally posted by chinamon
its always del so there is no point in asking.


i think it was you


Posted by smuncky on Dec-04-2009 12:47:

quote:
Originally posted by VERTiG0
You might say... He hit the "DEL" key! AHAHAHAHHAAahah.




aaaaahah.

ah.


classic cale.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Dec-04-2009 15:05:

quote:
Originally posted by DigitalMP
And I heard the movie sucked. So, 69 ftw...


it definitely didn't


Posted by Jem_hadar on Dec-04-2009 16:24:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyCrew
it definitely didn't


I enjoyed the the film (though that water/flooding business really scares the be-jesus out of me....)

Didn't even mind seeing it twice when another friend said she really wanted to see it.


Posted by Swamper on Dec-04-2009 20:46:

That's what happens when you miss a bracket and end up treating every thread as an event forum thread


Posted by Jem_hadar on Dec-04-2009 21:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
That's what happens when you miss a bracket and end up treating every thread as an event forum thread


Aaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.. of course..


Posted by Vogon on Dec-05-2009 03:48:

Nice, now I can post safely knowing that my time stamps will be accurate again.


Posted by Jem_hadar on Dec-05-2009 04:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Vogon
Nice, now I can post safely knowing that my time stamps will be accurate again.


^5


Posted by sunrise3500 on Dec-05-2009 15:34:

I'm currently having a turn...



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.