TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- FAO Australia
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
FAO Australia
Congratulations, global warming is now your fault. The Copenhagen summit is ruined, and you're to blame!
| quote: |
| "Australia and Japan are crying foul while blocking movement on legally binding emissions reductions for rich countries. This tit for tat approach is no way to deal with the climate crisis." African countries have refused to continue negotiations unless talks on a second commitment period to the Kyoto Protocol are prioritized ahead of broader discussions under a second LCA track. Australia, Japan and others have succeeded in stopping Kyoto Protocol discussions as a result. |
Ironically enough, yesterday, Melbourne was statistically the hottest spot on earth at 40 degrees Celsius.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ania_xox Ironically enough, yesterday, Melbourne was statistically the hottest spot on earth at 40 degrees Celsius. |
Re: FAO Australia
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov Congratulations, global warming is now your fault. |
Looks like we have something ELSE to add to the thread 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by bas Looks like we have something ELSE to add to the thread |
japan clearly diverted blame to dolphin and whale......
When is this global warming gonna kick in?
In northern england at 5 this mornin it wasnt present.
Or was Global warmings cousin Global fuckin freezing babysitting?.
As you can tell by the sarcasm , I think Global warming was an idea that has turned into an economy and is a load of pretentious bullshit.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by adi_hanson When is this global warming gonna kick in? In northern england at 5 this mornin it wasnt present. Or was Global warmings cousin Global fuckin freezing babysitting? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lira That's not how it's supposed to work. The global average temperature is supposed to go up, but that doesn't mean we're all going to fry at the same time as it happens. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by adi_hanson I was specifically told by the media 3 years ago that we would have baking long summers and mild winters coupled with a 13 foot sea level rise , which dont matter to me as im living 800 ft above sea level. It was promised , and it aint here yet |
she wanted me to go down on her, i told the bitch i dont eat swine.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by adi_hanson When is this global warming gonna kick in? In northern england at 5 this mornin it wasnt present. Or was Global warmings cousin Global fuckin freezing babysitting?. As you can tell by the sarcasm , I think Global warming was an idea that has turned into an economy and is a load of pretentious bullshit. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by adi_hanson I was specifically told by the media 3 years ago that we would have baking long summers and mild winters coupled with a 13 foot sea level rise , which dont matter to me as im living 800 ft above sea level. It was promised , and it aint here yet |
| quote: |
| Here's the thing I wonder. How do people who deny climate change reconcile that with guys like this (https://breeze.ucdavis.edu/p43042572/), who are spending entire careers on teasing out really non-dramatic aspects of climate change? This guy is not measuring carbon concentrations in oyster shells for the glory. There are thousands of these people, dorkily and steadily piecing out the causes and predicting effects. If it is all a conspiracy and nothing is happening, how do denialists conceive of these guys? Do they think these monotonous nerds who talk in jargon (don't take that the wrong way. I'm sexually attracted to every one of them.) are making it up to promote the conspiracy? Like, they spend the morning thinking up esoteric ways of measuring wave energy by sand lost at different gauges across the state and the afternoon faking their data so they can please Al Gore? They've done this now for 10 years and they plan to make an entire career out of making up the detailed groundwork for fake climate change? All of them? On nothing? Imagine the secret conferences they must hold to synchronize their stories and settle on an allowable variance between the made-up river data, the made-up precipitation data and the made-up ocean data. Besides the groupies, WHAT FOR? |
I wouldn't say I'm a denialist, but I'm not fully convinced either. History has shown that the Earth was capable of reasonably rapid temperature shifts before man ever jumped out of the trees. Though it's sensible to assume that we might be causing the current shift, I don't think the evidence is as conclusive as the media makes out.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by adi_hanson |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Domesticated I wouldn't say I'm a denialist, but I'm not fully convinced either. History has shown that the Earth was capable of reasonably rapid temperature shifts before man ever jumped out of the trees. Though it's sensible to assume that we might be causing the current shift, I don't think the evidence is as conclusive as the media makes out. |
/\
What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ania_xox Ironically enough, yesterday, Melbourne was statistically the hottest spot on earth at 40 degrees Celsius. |
It wasn't 40 in melbourne yesterday
| quote: |
| Originally posted by The17sss /\ What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by The17sss /\ What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov You're an AGW skeptic? Really? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by R!CH that is the most retarded excuse for a motive i've ever heard. one that i imagine can only come from a person whose never studied science in college. people strain the limits of their mental capacity for a phd in science for a decade or more not just so they can go out and get grant money thrown at them for fake science. people who get advanced degrees in science have a passion for seeking the truth through evidence-based experimentation grounded in logic. you understand that no matter how many millions of dollars are thrown at their institution for research, they can only use it to conduct research right? their salaries remain the same regardless. but of course, this grant money is the key behind the climate change science conspiracy and everyone in academia is in on it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by The17sss Last time I checked, the scientific method doesn't work by declaring a result first, then tweaking data in whichever way possible to line up with that pre-determined result. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by R!CH last time i checked that's not what happened. i figured you for a cynic, hope that works out for you. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.