TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- SDHC cards (for camera)
SDHC cards (for camera)
Is 32gb the largest you can get at this moment in time, or am I looking in the wrong places?! thanks 
you have a Hasselblad or something?
why do you need so much space!?
and yeah, i'm pretty sure that 32 is the biggest now. Stu will know better..
32gb is the biggest for time and all eternity. SDHC maxes out at 32gb. SDXC is anything above 32gb.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by gehzumteufel 32gb is the biggest for time and all eternity. SDHC maxes out at 32gb. SDXC is anything above 32gb. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smekzg you have a Hasselblad or something? why do you need so much space!? and yeah, i'm pretty sure that 32 is the biggest now. Stu will know better.. |

What sort of camera, Ian?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sushipunk What sort of camera, Ian? |
Looks pretty good. Leica lenses are among the best for point-and-shoot cameras.
Aperture could be a little better, but it's certainly not bad.
Aye. I mean I don't need an SLR, i will never be that good but I like to take pics and esp when I'm abroad, recapture the moments, and often on my old camera they just never came out right, but this has good reviews and I took some advise from people before going for it. Should do what I need 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian Aye. I mean I don't need an SLR, i will never be that good but I like to take pics and esp when I'm abroad, recapture the moments, and often on my old camera they just never came out right, but this has good reviews and I took some advise from people before going for it. Should do what I need |

speaking of SLRs
Stu, can you recommend me a cheap entry level DSLR?
i was looking at these two: Alpha 300 and E520 but i dunno..
should i go with one of them or is there a better option(in the similar price range)?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smekzg speaking of SLRs Stu, can you recommend me a cheap entry level DSLR? i was looking at these two: Alpha 300 and E520 but i dunno.. should i go with one of them or is there a better option(in the similar price range)? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by get nyce dont listen to this guy he doesn't know anything about electronics, he tried to make me buy a windows phone! |
I am not going to perpetuate bullshit like you are implying.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by get nyce dont listen to this guy he doesn't know anything about electronics, he tried to make me buy a windows phone! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ian Also since I plan to keep this camera for upto 10+ years if possible, then it makes sense to buy once ![]() |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by malek Do you honnestly believe that camera will last you 10+ year?? or maybe you put a zero too many in there |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sushipunk Out of those 2, I'd probably recommend the Sony, purely as the sensor quality is better. I don't know too much about Sony/Olympus gear though, since all my gear is Canon. Both of those cams have the advantage of having image stabilisation in the body itself, rather than in the lens, but I'd still recommend checking out some of the entry level Canon cams. The Canon xSi/450D is still a pretty good (and cheap) buy for an entry level camera. You just have to work out what kind of lens you want to use with it. The kit lenses you get with the body are never really that good (mostly, anyway). Edit: The Olympus cam there is also pretty fucking small. My gf has an E620 for a back-up body and I find it annoying to use, since I have big hands. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.