TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Montreal
-- Pola The Movie
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Pola The Movie
http://www.destructiva.com/polathemovie.com/
plur overload in the trailer
What is this movie? I can't find anything explaining what it is.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Dj Nacht What is this movie? I can't find anything explaining what it is. |
just found the facebook event...
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=245210938405

Seems interesting PLURRRRRRRRRRRRR
he didn't ask permission for anyone that is in the movie if they wanted to be in it. He didn't even ask the artist for the rights for the soundtrack. If I'm in this movie, I sue the guy.
...

http://www.rave.ca/en/community_thread/34904/#l
"Le film est suppos� �tre fait et bas� sur la communaut� de ce site web. Mais le gars, au lieu de donner un nom plus g�n�ral � son film qui repr�sente des centaines de personnes, il nomme �a le nom d'une personne qui est m�me pas une personne influente ici-dedans (c'est quand la derni�re que Pola s'est point� ici ?) et ce, effectivement, sans son consentement. La personne concern�e l'a contact� pour ne pas appara�tre dans le film et d'utiliser son nom comme titre du film mais �a semble avoir pass� 1000 pieds par-dessus la t�te du producteur du dit "suppos�" film.
lL gars qui a tourn� veut distribuer le film et a pas fait sign� Z�RO consentement d'utilisation d'identit� aux gens film�s. T's�, un document l�gal qui donne autorisation au producteur de film d'utiliser ton image et ton nom dans un document - en l'ocurrance un film - potentiellement destin� au grand publique ? Ouais, pas un chat a sign� �a pour ce film ( il ne se l'a pas fait offert � personne ). Criss, j'ai 15 minutes de vid�o tourn�e lors de mon marriage pis tout le monde pr�sent ont eu a signer cette d�claration. �a a l'a que lui en a pas de besoin pour les centaines de personnes film�s.
Ultimement, beaucoup de gens ont commnuniqu�s avec le producteur et il refuse obstin�ment de changer le nom du film, de faire signer quoi que ce soit � qui que ce soit, a apparemment envoy� promener des gens qui ne souhaitaient pas appara�tre dans le film (�a pas fond� mais, bon), d�fend son oeuvre malgr� les emb�ches l�gales et a apparemment engag� une DJ qui n'�tait m�me pas au courant qu'elle avait �t� engag� pour la trame sonore du film.
L�-dessus, rajoute le fait que des gens prennent sa d�fense pour des raisons incompr�hensibles sous pr�texte "qu'on va toute comprendre quand on va voir le film" que �a fait plus qu'un an qui est suppos� �tre sorti et que, personnellement, je ne crois pas qu'il pourra �ventuellement voir le jour.
"
One of many threads from rave.ca ...
ouuuuuhhhh !!!! rave.ca controversy !!!
thanks for reminding me why i don't go there anymore lol
this is possibly the gayest looking movie that i have ever seen 
Well... this and Party Monster

| quote: |
Originally posted by Schadenfreude this is possibly the gayest looking movie that i have ever seen |
iiiish �a pas l'air super bon ce film. le trailer est trash.
It's all bullshit
if you go on rave.ca you will see people fighting with him coz he didnt ask permission to use the footage
and the biggest bullshit is the Festival de Cannes thing
He is simply sending his DVD to the pre-selection committee and he already put their logo and everything on his website and flyer
making people believe it's going to play at Cannes
Any1 can just send their short movie to festival de Cannes it doesn't mean it's going to be selected to be part of the festival
The guy is a loser in my opinion
He even came to ask me 10k sponsorship one day
not to mention that the "soundtrack" for the movie on the website is not at all original works from dj pixie. I seriously doubt they paid the rights for the tracks if they do not even have permission from the people in the movie.
The Guy doesnt have any rights
he is a a retard
i know...i asked marc romboy if they had the rights to callisto, and he sounded angry as fuck when he told me no.
this is going to be funny.
yeah i can imagine the anger of people who end up in the movie without wanting it and he doesnt want to remove them
even if they do not intend to profit on this movie, intellectual rights still need to be obeyed (aka music) and are not allowed to be used in the way that this film does without expressed the permission from the artist and a licensing agreement.
If a hole in the wall bar needs to pay licensing fees just to play music in it, a "documentary" (term used very loosely) must adhere to these same rules.
If the guy thinks that a reputable film festival will screen movies that practice copyright infringement, he might be crazier than what everyone makes him out to be.
sorry didn't want to offend anyone. i might be naive in this.
if you guys are right, i misjudged antonino.
but he always been a great guy to me and never had a clue he could be able to bullshit people, i still have a hard time believing that.
there most be a part of the story we are missing.
but if you guys are right, we will hear about it soon quite sure.
you don't have to apologize to me man, you aren't the one who did something wrong.
even using the cannes festival logo is a blatant act of infringement.
i often read that the rave scene is dead in montreal.
i thought that by posting this i could aware people that it still exists and that it is really young and going well.
They will fill up our parties in a few years.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.