TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- T.O. and The Creative Class


Posted by PivotTechno on Jan-28-2010 14:56:

T.O. and The Creative Class

Found this recently - it's from last April, but it feels truer than ever...

ANALYSIS: CANADA HAS BEEN SPARED � FOR HOW MUCH LONGER?

Our cities are good, but they�ll need to be a lot better

RICHARD FLORIDA

April 11, 2009
The world is becoming more competitive � spikier � every day. And as we learned late last year, trying to grow an economy with financial capital alone leads to economic turmoil. Cities and regions increasingly need to invest in, and build up, their real capital � the kind that comes from the energy and talent of their people.Canada�s two biggest mega-regions � basically, the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal corridor and the West Coast � clearly put the country in the global game. Yet they pale in comparison with the world�s largest mega-regions and cities, such as Greater Tokyo, Greater London or the powerhouse that stretches from Amsterdam to Antwerp and Brussels.

This country has done a reasonably good job of accommodating global talent, but it will have to do even better. To succeed, its cities must become destinations for the world�s best and brightest. They must ensure that newcomers can use all of their skills and talents to contribute to the nation�s economic prosperity.

Moreover, for all their exemplary social cohesion, Canada�s urban centres show signs of stress. Major cities, including Toronto, have sprawled relentlessly, adding rings of bland, sprawling topography around energetic urban cores.

Traffic congestion in urban centres is appalling, on par with the worst U.S. cities. Housing in the city cores, and in many suburbs, has become unaffordable in the major urban centres, pricing out precisely the creative types that give a city innovative and entrepreneurial energy.

Canadian cities have been spared, for the most part, the financial tumult and economic and social polarization that have marred so many American cities.

This means greater diversity in the urban centres, and many more families living in the cores. It means more social dynamism and a real sense of equality at street level.

However, a landmark report by the University of Toronto�s Centre for Urban and Community Studies documents the transformation of Toronto into three separate cities: an affluent core, a poor periphery and a declining middle-class zone. The same basic trend can be seen in Vancouver. Things have yet to reach the extreme level of economic, cultural, class-based and ideological segmentation seen in the United States, but the challenge is growing. And that is something Canadians need to be concerned about.

There is much to be done to strengthen the position of Canada�s mega-regions � and to overcome stale rivalries left over from the past century. Pitting East against West, or urban against rural, will stymie change here, just as the red-blue divide in the U.S. has distracted Americans from the far more urgent matter of getting ready for the world that lies ahead.

The �spiky� world is one of increasingly concentrated opportunity and greater social, economic and geographic inequality. The greatest challenge of our time is to find new strategies to overcome this accelerating morass of social polarization and economic inequality.

Toronto is one of few places in the world able to become the model of a full-blown, creative community, one that is sustainable and inclusive.

Some have suggested that my theory about a creative class is relevant only to a pampered elite -�yuppies, sophistos and gays� is how one critic put it � but they are missing the point. The most fundamental aspect of my work is the belief that every human being is creative. The real winners of the 21st century will do more than just provide an attractive climate for high-tech innovation, cutting-edge arts and entertainment (although that will help).

True success will turn on harnessing the full creativity of every single human being. This is not wishful thinking. It is part and parcel of the grand logic of economic development that requires more intensive, effective and productive use of human talent.

Right now, the most economically dynamic regions in the world tap the capabilities of less than half of their populations. But they are islands of innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship surrounded by a sea of untapped capability. What about the other 60-plus per cent?

In particular, how do we harness the full capabilities of the millions of workers in the service industry; how do we make their jobs more creative, productive and fulfilling; and how do we ensure that their wages rise, making them the equivalent of those good, high-paying, secure manufacturing jobs of the past industrial age?

Harnessing the full talent of everyone is the real key to sustainable prosperity. Those places that manage to harness this talent most thoroughly will emerge as the key success stories of the new century.

With a long history of openness and tolerance, of investing in people, of inclusiveness and social justice, Canada�s cities and regions are among those with the best opportunity to accomplish sustainable prosperity. But Canada will require a new kind of social compact � a �creative compact� that goes beyond the provisions of social insurance, health care, basic education and the like, which defined the twentieth century.

This new creative compact starts from two key principles: that all human beings have a fundamental right to use their full talents and creative abilities; and that in doing so they all have the right to self-expression, which is the basic building material of creative and productive endeavours. These rights are not the icing on the cake of prosperity and progress � they are the cake itself.

Making the most of this opportunity requires leadership and sustained effort, but the benefits are beyond comprehension.


This article is adapted from the newly released Canadian edition of Who�s Your City? � Richard Florida. Published by Random House Canada. All rights reserved.

Richard Florida is director of the Martin Prosperity Institute at the University of Toronto�s Rotman School of Management


***


La dolce vita

In the new Canadian edition of last year�s Who�s Your City? Richard Florida sizes up the best places to live north of the border, depending on who you are.

SINGLES (Age 20-29)

1. Calgary
2. Iqaluit
3. Ottawa-Gatineau
4. Victoria
5. Yellowknife
6. Edmonton
7. Guelph, Ont.
8. Canmore, Alta.
9. Whitehorse
10. Montreal

MID-CAREER PROFESSIONALS (Age 29-44)

1. Ottawa-Gatineau
2. Calgary
3. Whitehorse
4. Yellowknife
5. Iqaluit
6. Edmonton
7. Guelph
8. Victoria
9. Toronto
10. Montreal

FAMILIES with CHILDREN

1. Ottawa-Gatineau
2. Toronto
3. Calgary
4. Fredericton
5. Yellowknife
6. Guelph
7. Quebec City
8. Kingston
9. Hamilton
10. Montreal

EMPTY-NESTERS (Age 45-64)

1. Toronto
2. Ottawa-Gatineau
3. Calgary
4. Victoria
5. Canmore
6. Charlottetown
7. Vancouver
8. Montreal
9. Parksville, B.C.
10. Kingston

RETIREES (Age 65 and over)

1. Ottawa-Gatineau
2. Toronto
3. Calgary
4. Victoria
5. Montreal
6. Vancouver
7. Kingston
8. Quebec City
9. Guelph
10. Halifax


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-28-2010 16:35:

Whats holding us back is the constant meddling into our lives by all levels of government. Particularily the provincial and municipal ones.

They stifle organic creativity with one hand (bans, restrictions, social engineering) and then waste taxpayers money by trying to start government approved creativity with the other.

ENOUGH ALREADY!!

The reason why toronto started to become a cool place to be in the 90s was because during that time the government was very hands off when it came to the city. Live and let live. Hell even cops wouldnt be intrusive back then unless they had to be.

The reason it declined so much in the last decade is because of precisely the opposite. Government interference has killed the golden goose.


Posted by gl.tch on Jan-28-2010 17:40:

would you like a broom for that sweeping generalization?


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-28-2010 17:55:

quote:
Originally posted by gl.tch
would you like a broom for that sweeping generalization?


call it what you will, and of course everything has its exception. But in a nutshell, this is what has happened in the last 20 years.


Posted by smuncky on Jan-28-2010 18:06:

check out this interview from a couple of months ago on spacing radio.

http://spacing.ca/radio/2009/09/14/...ichard-florida/


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-28-2010 18:59:

sad about the bookstore..

but these boneheads lost me when they started crying about how adelaide and richmond are one way streets and how they should be converted into slow two way streets.

I guess these folks have never traveled anywhere.

New York, Tokyo, Buenos Aires, Paris, London.

All magnificent cities. All feature grand one way boulevards to move their traffic around.

Im sick of those who want to make toronto the world's biggest small town.


Posted by Adamo on Jan-28-2010 19:04:

YES IQALIUT IS IDEAL FOR SINGLES. Yellowknife and and Whitehorse also make the top 10, makes sense.







.....WTF!


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-28-2010 19:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Adamo
YES IQALIUT IS IDEAL FOR SINGLES. Yellowknife and and Whitehorse also make the top 10, makes sense.







.....WTF!


probably about the only place one can afford on a single salary these days!


Posted by PivotTechno on Jan-28-2010 19:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Adamo
YES IQALIUT IS IDEAL FOR SINGLES. Yellowknife and and Whitehorse also make the top 10, makes sense.








.....WTF!


So you've been, then?

Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it ain't true!


Posted by feelgood on Jan-28-2010 20:12:

Interesting read.

quote:

Right now, the most economically dynamic regions in the world tap the capabilities of less than half of their populations. But they are islands of innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship surrounded by a sea of untapped capability. What about the other 60-plus per cent?

In particular, how do we harness the full capabilities of the millions of workers in the service industry; how do we make their jobs more creative, productive and fulfilling; and how do we ensure that their wages rise, making them the equivalent of those good, high-paying, secure manufacturing jobs of the past industrial age?


It is fair to assume that every single person is a creative being in their own right, and it is fair to assume that perhaps their current job or living situation may stymie their output.

However, i think it's inherently flawed to think that we can engineer a society where the manufacturing sector is a higher paid and not a conventional blue collar job. Market prices dictate the value of a job. "Secure manufacturing jobs" are a thing of the past for a reason, times have changed, and there is no longer as much demand for these positions"


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-28-2010 20:49:

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
So you've been, then?

Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it ain't true!


u know what they say.. there is nothing better than a tight seal!


Posted by The Ear on Jan-28-2010 20:55:

quote:
Originally posted by gl.tch
would you like a broom for that sweeping generalization?



Posted by slingshot on Jan-28-2010 21:57:

Richard Florida, the elitist.

I've had about enough of this guy.


Posted by Adamo on Jan-28-2010 22:24:

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
So you've been, then?

Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it ain't true!


I dont need to go to Iqaluit to know that a fucking paint huffing community of natives living in a shanty town has absolutly nothing to offer "SINGLES", and its #2. Not to mention yellowknife and whitehorse with average temperatures of -40 and a greater moose to hottie ratio. You sir, can fuck right off.


Posted by Dark_Archonis on Jan-28-2010 23:01:

While he makes a few good points...

As soon as I saw the the Top 10 lists he compiled, is when I realized this guy is a complete JOKE.

Useless really, nothing to see here, everyone move along.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.