TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Nick T's $5000 offer.......
Pages (7): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »


Posted by cammaxwell on Mar-14-2010 23:45:

Nick T's $5000 offer.......

I haven't really been following the whole Nick T thing on here but thought you guys might be interested in this, he posted in on my FB wall.

Apparently he was interviewed and got "a chance" to bash "someone" who bashs him online, I only assume that's on TA. He was apparently then offered $5000 to play a club in T.O.

FACEBOOK LINK

quote:
Hey everyone I hope you are all doing well & I hope the year has been treating you good so far

I had a oppertuntiy to do my first EDM & Online radio interview on 03/03/10 It was suppose to be a live studio interview but some crazy stuff happened that most of you will never believe

I got to talk about sampling in the first part & a little bit about myself in the 2nd part

I also got a oppertunity to make talk about a Canadian dj who thinks its cool to make fun of me & my music on message boards & in real life I got the chance to do the same to him on air but I never say names

It was a very memorable interview for me as there were like 10 ppl who called in

1 caller Said they were the Manager of a Nightclub In the gta & offered me $5000 to spin in the venue as long as I can get 400 ppl in I was just wondering if you guys think thats a good price since your in that industry


Heres The $5000 offer
$5000 Offer

Heres the QTrip interview 03/03/10
Part 1
Part 2

Heres Me Making Fun Of The Canadian DJ Who Made Fun Of Me
Mickey Mouse

Heres My Break On Z Drive @ 5
Mr T Break On Z Drive @ 5

Heres the Masterplan interview 07/19/09
Masterplan interview


Posted by VDub on Mar-14-2010 23:54:

I find it amusing that he's becoming so popular...

All publicity is good publicity right???


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Mar-14-2010 23:55:

quote:
Originally posted by VDub
I find it amusing that he's becoming so popular...

All publicity is good publicity right???


He's the "Heidi and Spencer" of Toronto.


Posted by Nobbie Q on Mar-15-2010 01:36:

Ozmosis (sp?) so called manager of Vola made this offer on my show.


Posted by haqq on Mar-15-2010 01:50:

Nick T. > Mr. T


Posted by barbina on Mar-15-2010 02:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Nobbie Q
Ozmosis (sp?) so called manager of Vola made this offer on my show.


baahhaha go Ozzy go!
Whats Mr. Morton to say about that?


Posted by VDub on Mar-15-2010 02:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Nobbie Q
Ozmosis (sp?) so called manager of Vola made this offer on my show.


Ozzy are you plotting to get me out to your club???

Cause I'm pretty sure this would do it...


Posted by DigiNut on Mar-15-2010 02:31:

Please stop feeding this serial plagiarist's attempts at publicity, kthx.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Mar-15-2010 03:25:

To be fair........


there would be no such thing as house music if everyone credited everyone for the samples they used.

i would say a good 80% of house (Especially that from the 90s) is uncredited and sampled from disco or even music from the 60s.

have a gander through discogs

ill just leave this thread with 1 example.







not trying to defend the goon but if it wasn't for "illegal" sampling there would be no such thing as house music.


this is one of the reasons why the scene is/was "underground"

Seeing how he is so pompus and proud and not keeping it low key says alot. IF this is the case then perhaps he should be getting licenses to use the music.

its a fine line i guess. producers (Especially those sampling raw loops from previously made songs) should have a sense of humility towards the original piece.



IMO.


Posted by Endlesswave on Mar-15-2010 03:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
To be fair........


there would be no such thing as house music if everyone credited everyone for the samples they used.

i would say a good 80% of house (Especially that from the 90s) is uncredited and sampled from disco or even music from the 60s.

have a gander through discogs

ill just leave this thread with 1 example.







not trying to defend the goon but if it wasn't for "illegal" sampling there would be no such thing as house music.


this is one of the reasons why the scene is/was "underground"

Seeing how he is so pompus and proud and not keeping it low key says alot. IF this is the case then perhaps he should be getting licenses to use the music.

its a fine line i guess. producers (Especially those sampling raw loops from previously made songs) should have a sense of humility towards the original piece.



IMO.


Believe me I agree but he's NO Dj Shadow...even he had an insane amount of originality and uniqueness when he was playing samples.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Mar-15-2010 03:38:

ahh ok.. well im just shedding some light into the issue.. i have just stumbled accross his name a couple of times and hearing alot of people talking about credit this, credit that etc. The reality is (if that were the case) most of all house producers would be in jail.


i try once in a while to edit comments on discogs to make sure that people who browse the track understand where the original came from.


just clarifying chris


Posted by DigiNut on Mar-15-2010 04:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
ahh ok.. well im just shedding some light into the issue..

No, actually, you're not, because he only calls it "sampling" in order to make it sound legitimate. It's actually nothing of the sort, it's more like a really bad mash-up, ripping large sections from 3 or 4 different songs and chucking them into eJay or something, adding no original material whatsoever, and then calling it his own track.

It's also wholly irrelevant how house music was shaped by sampling. That was decades ago, when the copyright laws hadn't caught up. Simply because such things were acceptable back then does not mean that they are still acceptable today. Today, you ask for permission before ripping anything longer than about half a second (i.e. anything recognizable) and co-opting it for your own track.

Now can we stop with this? It's getting annoying with all of these people who don't know the back-story offering up theories and insights. It's not that hard to search.


Posted by jon jon on Mar-15-2010 04:57:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
No, actually, you're not


haha sick post


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Mar-15-2010 05:10:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
No, actually, you're not, because he only calls it "sampling" in order to make it sound legitimate. It's actually nothing of the sort, it's more like a really bad mash-up, ripping large sections from 3 or 4 different songs and chucking them into eJay or something, adding no original material whatsoever, and then calling it his own track.

It's also wholly irrelevant how house music was shaped by sampling. That was decades ago, when the copyright laws hadn't caught up. Simply because such things were acceptable back then does not mean that they are still acceptable today. Today, you ask for permission before ripping anything longer than about half a second (i.e. anything recognizable) and co-opting it for your own track.

Now can we stop with this? It's getting annoying with all of these people who don't know the back-story offering up theories and insights. It's not that hard to search.


the track i posted was created in 1999


I don't want to go back and look at the whole history of this illiterate douche who thinks he's tiesto, but at the same time i want people to understand that house music is based on sampling and remixing (for the most part without credit being given). It still happens today and producers make tons of money.


Just look at eric prydz.

I think credit should always be given (thats my opinion even if its a 4 beat sample).

so i guess ill refrain. I don't want to stir up the pot. Just some food for thought.


Posted by geroin on Mar-15-2010 06:10:

i'm sorry for participating in this shitty thread about *****, just wanted to add this

http://www.superswell.com/samplelaw/licensing.html


Posted by infinity HiGH on Mar-15-2010 16:29:

ffs can these threads be banned or something? everyone is just playing into the guys hands by giving him more and more publicity.

please just start banning people who mention the guy on this forum.


Posted by Abercrombie on Mar-15-2010 17:10:

$5000 is a good deal if he personally can bring in 400 people at $50 a ticket.


Posted by jon jon on Mar-15-2010 17:18:


















Posted by FunkyCrew on Mar-15-2010 17:22:

lol Jon
I feel trippy now


Posted by ChemEnhanced on Mar-15-2010 17:22:

quote:
Originally posted by jon jon



















Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Mar-15-2010 17:23:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
ffs can these threads be banned or something? everyone is just playing into the guys hands by giving him more and more publicity.

please just start banning people who mention the guy on this forum.


no we need more drama


Posted by Intangible on Mar-15-2010 17:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
no we need more drama


But this isn't even fun drama... it's old, beat to the death drama... the same stupid shit over and over again


Posted by BuffaloLiz on Mar-15-2010 17:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Intangible
But this isn't even fun drama... it's old, beat to the death drama... the same stupid shit over and over again


Couldn't agree more


Posted by Nobbie Q on Mar-15-2010 19:37:

You ladies can just AVOID the thread altogether if u have a problem. You guys are akin to some tech house lover hijacking a review thread on a trance event or vice versa simply because it's not your style of music.

You guys are inadvertantly causing more publicity good or bad by complaining when you could have avoided the thread altoghether. Part 2 interview will be coming up in the future...and if I attracted you guys to the 1st interview then that's YOUR fault, not *****'s.


Posted by Intangible on Mar-15-2010 19:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Nobbie Q
You ladies can just AVOID the thread altogether if u have a problem. You guys are akin to some tech house lover hijacking a review thread on a trance event or vice versa simply because it's not your style of music.

You guys are inadvertantly causing more publicity good or bad by complaining when you could have avoided the thread altoghether. Part 2 interview will be coming up in the future...and if I attracted you guys to the 1st interview then that's YOUR fault, not *****'s.


The only reason you like him is because thats most likely the most listenrs you've ever had....


Pages (7): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.