TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Tracklist Requests / Postings
-- Nick Warren @ Freeze, Liverpool - 16-Apr-2010
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Nick Warren @ Freeze, Liverpool - 16-Apr-2010

01. Alex Monakhov & Que - Hola [Anjunadeep]
02. Cirez D - Glow (In The Dark Dub) [Mouseville]
03. PJC Project - I House You (Mark Holmes & Ticker Remix) [Limbo]
04. Henry Saiz - They Came From The Light (Hernan Cattaneo & Soundexile Remix) [Natura Sonoris]
05. Marco Effe - Janet [Cecille]
06. Dosem - Silent Drop [Sino]
07. Way Out West - Ultraviolet (Guy J Remix) [Hope]
08. Anton Pieete & Delete - Minutos [Sci & Tec]
09. Mory Kante - Yeke Yeke (Hardfloor Remix) [Going Global Series]
10. General Midi - Absinthe (Nick Warren Mix) [Distinctive]
11. Depeche Mode - Peace (Peter Rauhofer Remix) w/ Panoptic - Surface [Minimal]
12. Jay Lumen - Morning Cocktail [Anjunadeep]
13. Pig & Dan - Pressure [Spielstaub]
14. Tim Deluxe - Sawubona [Skint]
15. ID 90
16. Way Out West - Future Perfect [Hope]
17. King Unique - 20000000 Suns (John Digweed & Nick Muir Remix) [Bedrock]
18. Daft Punk - Alive [Virgin] w/ Killahurtz - West On 27th
19. Spooky - Little Bullet Revisited [Renaissance]
20. Mihalis Safras - San Trope (Oxia Remix) [Material]
21. Way Out West - Bodymotion (Seb Dhajje Remix) [Hope]
22. Chemical Brothers - Escape Velocity [Parlophone]
23. Sander Kleinenberg - My Lexicon (Elke Klejin Remix) [Little Mountain] w/ Culoe de Song - The Brightest Forest [Innervisions]

nick didnt want this set recorded and asked for links to be removed. Not that that maters on this forum because no one gives a shit about the artist here!

quote:

Originally posted by sex hitcher nick didnt want this set recorded and asked for links to be removed. Not that that maters on this forum because no one gives a shit about the artist here!

wille be a hard thing to remove that from web

119 min. Mihalis Safras - San Trope (Oxia Remix)

quote:

Originally posted by dancefortrance wille be a hard thing to remove that from web

Like I said before no one here gives a fuck about the artist. A few years back someone upload Nicks GU Amsterdam CD and the mods didn't remove it.

01 Que & Alex Monakhov - Que

17 King Unique - 20000000 Suns (John Digweed & Nick Muir Remix)

quote:

Originally posted by sex hitcher Like I said before no one here gives a fuck about the artist. A few years back someone upload Nicks GU Amsterdam CD and the mods didn't remove it.

sure it's not nice to upload something the dj didn't allow!
but to be honest this set isn't special at all - nearly everything in is is released and true - you can't get it off the internet now!

I won't upload the Soungarden 320's this time, out of respect for Nick and his right to say "nay" every once in a while.

When its out, its out... and you should just roll with it (as an artist).
That is the digital age for ya... removing links or not doesn't have anything to do with respecting the artist.

Obviously normally all uploads that have albums are removed once noted by a mod, that's also in the guidelines of the forum.

Nick has a contract to do 6 frisky Radio shows over 12 months and it really don't help the radio show if your releasing something similar and for free for something they have paid for. And as soon as you say "well its out there now, we can't stop it" you just encourage more people to do the same. Maybe whoever had it should of left it a 6/12 months and it mite of been less of a problem. But then they could of asked him if they could record it in the first place. I'm also willing to bet that the Amsterdam thread and link are still on this forum.

When, as a site, you want to have a correct relantionship with a dj, you fill requests like these, that's the whole point. Zabiela posted the tongless em against his own interest, just to please fans.
This is just for debate's sake, of course, it's hard to "stop" a file from spreading.

I'm not saying that its fair, I'm just merely stating that you can't believe this will actually help it at all... it will just put it in the light more because ppl will think: "hey the set was taken offline, maybe it has some good and brand new stuff in there" and they will just find other ways to find it.

With that in mind its just my opinion, as far as my sense of these things go (meaning Im experienced enough in this field), that its tough luck, but just roll with it.

Im not encouraging more people to do the same either, it is my understanding that the club agreed that this could be put up for download on ms. This is what those special clauses are for in DJ contracts

quote:

Originally posted by sbando Zabiela posted the tongless em against his own interest, just to please fans. This is just for debate's sake, of course, it's hard to "stop" a file from spreading.

He also thought it was not entirely finished and thus he was not satisfied enough with it. So it was also in his own interest a little bit

The club's owner's good faith is out of question this time. He seemed genuinely shocked.

quote:

Originally posted by Glaniskanis He also thought it was not entirely finished and thus he was not satisfied enough with it. So it was also in his own interest a little bit

Yeah, of course ... But he's a very nice guy. Danny Howells is another good guy, not to mention WOW (but they can be jealous of their stuff and strict from time to time).

quote:

Originally posted by sbando Yeah, of course ... But he's a very nice guy. Danny Howells is another good guy, not to mention WOW.

Obviously! They all are extremely nice

quote:

Originally posted by Glaniskanis I'm just merely stating that you can't believe this will actually help it at all.

It did with James Zabiela's Gods Kitchen set

quote:

Originally posted by Glaniskanis I'm not saying that its fair, I'm just merely stating that you can't believe this will actually help it at all... it will just put it in the light more because ppl will think: "hey the set was taken offline, maybe it has some good and brand new stuff in there" and they will just find other ways to find it. With that in mind its just my opinion, as far as my sense of these things go (meaning Im experienced enough in this field), that its tough luck, but just roll with it. Im not encouraging more people to do the same either, it is my understanding that the club agreed that this could be put up for download on ms. This is what those special clauses are for in DJ contracts

What your actually saying is you have a higher regard for the record company than the artist. You wouldnt apply the same principal to official releases which are also out there and available for free if you Google them because that would upset a record company and you would fear reprisals from a record company who could take legal action. What's Interesting is the record company will also tell you that they are trying to stop people downloading their music for free because they are looking after the interests of the artist. However if they where really looking after the artists they should really give them much better contracts instead of trying to exploit the artist at every opportunity

Don't know what all the fuss is about, is it a trick? Are people just tryin to hype it up by making this fuss?

It's a very average mix, no real promos in there, a fair few old tracks that we've heard alot of other djs play earlier in the year.

The radio station have paid for him to be on their station because he is a big name and will bring more listeners and promotion. Something like this will not effect the station atall.

I really don't see the problem.

You don't really see what? Just read the posts above yours.

The file is still here on ta, and it can be found all over the Web, as Glannie has stressed out, what are you talking about?

What I mean is it's just a live recorded set like loads of others on here, its not even the best I've heard from him. There is no point crying about it it, it's done now. If Nick has really said he didn't want it recorded then I don't understand why. For him it's just extra promotion

You're not wrong but this is for debate's sake only, Nick never asked here and no one removed anything anyway, we're just talking about a dj's right to stop the distribution of something he didn't approve, whoever that dj is.

quote:

Originally posted by Nightly its not even the best I've heard from him. There is no point crying about it it, it's done now.

Your opinion of the mix is completely irrelevant. If I posted Tiesto's next mix CD because I thought it was crap it wouldnt strengthen the argument. Here look

http://www.megadownload.net/search/tiesto%20/all.html

There is no point crying about it it, it's done now

Yes but it's not a mixed cd is it? It a recording of a live event that he has been paid to do and therefore there is no problem as far as I can see. It is out of the artists hands.
Are you going to have a go at the people who recorded 10mins of that gig on their phones and demand they take them off YouTube?

I could understand your point if this was a mix that is copyriten or composed for making money but it's not.

quote:

Originally posted by Nightly Yes but it's not a mixed cd is it? It a recording of a live event that he has been paid to do and therefore there is no problem as far as I can see. It is out of the artists hands. Are you going to have a go at the people who recorded 10mins of that gig on their phones and demand they take them off YouTube? I could understand your point if this was a mix that is copyriten or composed for making money but it's not.

It doesn't mater if its a mix CD or not. Nearly all the music on the music on that mix is actually copy written by the artists who made the tracks and letting people reproduce it is still illegal. Essential Mixes are a good example of this. The BBC has the full right to prosecute people who copy and download that broadcast, however they choose not to. Another example of this, try uploading James Zabiela's Depeche Mode v The Church on to YouTube this will get blocked straight away and you will be sent and email warning you about copyright infringement. You just have to look at the trouble MixesDB got into a few years back.

Oh Them people on mobile phones are absolute maggots. Tenaglia was right throw them out of the club

quote:

Originally posted by sex hitcher What your actually saying is you have a higher regard for the record company than the artist. You wouldnt apply the same principal to official releases which are also out there and available for free if you Google them because that would upset a record company and you would fear reprisals from a record company who could take legal action. What's Interesting is the record company will also tell you that they are trying to stop people downloading their music for free because they are looking after the interests of the artist. However if they where really looking after the artists they should really give them much better contracts instead of trying to exploit the artist at every opportunity

Im in no way saying that I have a higher regard for the record company, and I totally agree that they are exploiting artists way too much and way too often.

Im saying the rules HERE state that those official album releases can't be posted so Im sticking to it. You won't see me reposting this set either, because I also believe in respecting the artist in this case. The fact is that its on the net, and thats why I said it can't really be helped anymore.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.