TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Criminal Investigation of BP Staged Oil Spill Vital to Gulf Recovery
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Criminal Investigation of BP Staged Oil Spill Vital to Gulf Recovery

Why did current CEO of BP Tony Hayward dump approximately one-third of his BP stocks before the oil crisis? Why did Goldman Sachs dump a hefty 44% of its BP stock prior to, particularly given that Peter Sutherland was formerly CEO of both BP and Goldman Sachs at the same time? What are the odds that former Vice-President Dick Cheney�s firm Halliburton would purchase a company which �focuses on oil spill prevention and blowout response,� just weeks before the so-called �biggest environmental crisis� of all time would strike?

�Workers from the rig and company officials have said that hours before the explosion, gases were leaking through the cement, which had been set in place by the oil services contractor, Halliburton. Investigators have said these leaks were the likely cause of the explosion,� reported the Times.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/states-...-oil-spill.html

dude. don't link to prisonplanet

You're a fucking ignoramus.

Ok, but why would the CEO hold onto 2/3 of his stocks?
Why would Goldman Sachs hold 56% of their stocks?

And most importantly, why would BP cause a spill? What does the company have to gain?

quote:

Originally posted by idoru You're a fucking ignoramus.

Your insults are old. If you disagree, then point out facts or debate the subject but just to call people names with curse words in them is childish. Name calling is in fact childish.

If you have a history of arguing with this TA member over issues then I could very well understand your comment but so far I just see it over and over again to different TA members.

You're a f*cking moron
You're a f*cking ignoramus
You're a f*cking idiot

And stop playing devils advocate as well, that too is getting old.

I'm actually going to have to agree.

idoru, this aggression will not stand.

You're becoming as abrasive as Fledz these days, and that guy's a regular brillo pad of abuse.

Anyone who cites Alex Jones or Prison-planet doesn't deserve a debate. They've already proved they believe in bullshit.

quote:

Originally posted by Comrade Stalin Anyone who cites Alex Jones or Prison-planet doesn't deserve a debate. They've already proved they believe in bullshit.

I see your point but maybe they need to be informed, I mean if your going to post anyway, why not inform the person instead of insulting.

If there is a past history between people then I'm all for the insulting but I think informing would be better than insulting.

this is the worst logic i've ever seen.

lol dumbass of the year post. Perhaps Eddie zellers might back you up, but no sympathy from my end.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu I see your point but maybe they need to be informed, I mean if your going to post anyway, why not inform the person instead of insulting. If there is a past history between people then I'm all for the insulting but I think informing would be better than insulting.

Of course there is a history of iTranscendence tendencies to copy and paste any and every conspiracy theory that comes his way.

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...600#post9903600

quote:

Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit lol dumbass of the year post. Perhaps Eddie zellers might back you up, but no sympathy from my end.

Who's Eddie zellers and who's post might he back up?

I'm just sandbagging for maturity here. The logical reason I say fire away whith insulting is because of A history between people is because I know how heated people can become so I therefore I just don't like picking sides so I stay quite. But when it's the same crap over and over to different people I find it lame. That is all I have to say.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu I'm just sandbagging for maturity here. The logical reason I say fire away whith insulting is because of A history between people is because I know how heated people can become so I therefore I just don't like picking sides so I stay quite.

... whoa.

quote:

Originally posted by idoru ... whoa.

Hahaha, yeah I think that just broke my brain.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu I see your point but maybe they need to be informed, I mean if your going to post anyway, why not inform the person instead of insulting.

People that espouse such na�ve, ignorant and ridiculous beliefs are immune to facts and logic. By holding such beliefs they already demonstrate that they are incapable of reaching valid conclusions from information presented. Attempting to �inform� them is a waste of time and effort, and engaging them in polite debate makes it look as though their opinions are somewhat valid and deserving of attention.

Fuck him, the guy�s an idiot.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu If there is a past history between people then I'm all for the insulting but I think informing would be better than insulting.

There is. iStupid is the newest TA conspiratard and deserves all the abuse he gets.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu I'm just sandbagging for maturity here. The logical reason I say fire away whith insulting is because of A history between people is because I know how heated people can become so I therefore I just don't like picking sides so I stay quite. But when it's the same crap over and over to different people I find it lame. That is all I have to say.

quote:

Originally posted by ModernNosferatu I'm just sandbagging for maturity here. The logical reason I say fire away whith insulting is because of A history between people is because I know how heated people can become so I therefore I just don't like picking sides so I stay quite. But when it's the same crap over and over to different people I find it lame. That is all I have to say.

Does. Not. Compute.

The facts speak for themselves.

Bash Alex. Bash "Conspiracy theories/ists" like rich and powerful men have never conspired ever in the history of humanity to gain more wealth and power, or no longer do so, they are our benevolent "officials" here to protect us.

If that helps you sleep better at night, believing that I am the crazy/ignorant/naive one who sits around day and night waiting desperately for the approval from the Statist circle jerk of losers who've made a home in this board. Hey by all means delude yourself.

I personally don't give a fuck about what any of you have to say about me personally or my "beliefs". My beliefs, however have nothing to do with any of the facts presented, they are documented, either in court hearings already with the survivors, or by a plethora of mainstream media sources.

So, believe what you want, and say what you want even if you didn't even review the evidence presented, it doesn't refute any of the factual evidence at hand.

I posted this information, because no amount of brow beating by one's and zero's (more of the latter) is going to deter the truth.

Please, keep bumping it to insult, mock and attack me personally.

I heard there was a cover up with Chernobyl too, yea the cover up you heard about by the Soviets was just a COVER UP OF THE COVER UP.

The real purpose was to microwave 20 million tons of fried chicken for the black panthers Illuminati meeting that year.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence The facts speak for themselves.

Oh, they most certainly do.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence Bash Alex. Bash "Conspiracy theories/ists" like rich and powerful men have never conspired ever in the history of humanity to gain more wealth and power, or no longer do so, they are our benevolent "officials" here to protect us.

I agree. If you could point us to the all the wealth and power BP has gained since the disaster started, that would be a good start.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence If that helps you sleep better at night, believing that I am the crazy/ignorant/naive one who sits around day and night waiting desperately for the approval from the Statist circle jerk of losers who've made a home in this board. Hey by all means delude yourself.

Oh, we definitely think you�re crazy and ignorant and na�ve, but what you do is wait around desperately for your next conspiracy crusade. Luckily for you it doesn�t last long, because you�ve never met a conspiracy you didn�t like.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence I personally don't give a fuck about what any of you have to say about me personally or my "beliefs". My beliefs, however have nothing to do with any of the facts presented, they are documented, either in court hearings already with the survivors, or by a plethora of mainstream media sources. So, believe what you want, and say what you want even if you didn't even review the evidence presented, it doesn't refute any of the factual evidence at hand.

Actually, your personal beliefs are what�s on trial. Because only a loony with a love for the woo would believe a company deliberately fucked itself hard in the arse as part of some clandestine plot. Only a loony would make such idiotic inferences from the evidence provided. Yes, there may well be charges for BP to answer; negligence comes to mind. But as per usual, your understanding of the event has little to do with evidence or reality.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence I posted this information, because no amount of brow beating by one's and zero's (more of the latter) is going to deter the truth.

I honestly don�t know where this forum would be without truth seeking warriors defending and educating us poor sheeple. Thanks for making such heroic efforts on our behalf, the control-c control-v combo definitely doesn�t come easy, thank you for your sacrifices.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence Please, keep bumping it to insult, mock and attack me personally.

Will do!

Deep asshole scratch. Do it. And then smell your finger.

This will end war.

quote:

Originally posted by iTranscendence

Can't help but notice you didn't answer my questions from before.

If people selling shares is evidence of a conspiracy, why did they all hold onto a majority of their shares?

And why would BP cause a leak? What possible positive does this give them?

I Can't help but notice you just read what I pasted in the original post instead of looking at all the data.

Otherwise you would have known that was only one part of the evidence and only in conjunction with them forcing the drillers to put sea water into the hole when the engineers clearly and vocally warned them that it would blow the well up; all of which has already come out in the coast guard hearings; can it be linked to foreknowledge of deliberate effort to sabotage the process.

If you again ask me 'why' they would do that because it's costing them money. You will again have not looked at any of the data because it was BP who originally sat in on the meetings with Clinton and Gore where the concept of a "cap and trade scheme" was first devised. Meaning in layman's terms; They've spent a lot of money and time on this and won't get it back unless it's implemented.

You see, the problem, with not actually looking at the information and then making me explain it to you, right?

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.