TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Ever Lie To To Get Some Stink?You Could Be Charged With "Rape By Deception"
Ever Lie To To Get Some Stink?You Could Be Charged With "Rape By Deception"
better start tellin the truth!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3843018...ime_and_courts/
Copied from the comments on that site:
If a guy can be prosecuted for lying about his wealth to get laid, then the woman should be prosecuted for prostitution, because at that point she's defined WHAT she is - now she is simply defining her price.
Its no longer consentual if the girl is stupid?
Yeah, read about this when it happened. He got jewed!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by The17sss Its no longer consentual if the girl is stupid? |
They'd have to identify me, first. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Arbiter They'd have to identify me, first. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Is it true you�re the last of the Mohicans? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Arbiter No, that's just propaganda. There are still dozens of us. Hundreds, even. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Do you have a cool tribal name? Like Stone Heart or Cold Soul or Two Dogs Fucking? |
men have been telling lies to birds for years to get laid and now you can get done for it 
what if the bitch has fake tits..like push-up bras or those skin tone fake tits...can i claim fraud since im a tit man and find out i slept with ms. moskito bites?
Whats even more fucked is that certain states in Australia now allow mistresses to make claims over their partner�s assets. Like, wtf?
| quote: |
CHEATING husbands will be open to divorce-style litigation from their mistresses under new laws. Mistresses can now claim income maintenance, property and even superannuation funds under the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures), dubbed the "mistress laws", which were passed by the Senate last November and came into effect today (March 1). The main objective is to remove same-sex discrimination from the Family Court system, but they have left the door open for a raft of de facto relationship claims. The laws declare that de facto couples who satisfy basic criteria - such as being in the relationship for at least two years - will be treated in the Family Court in the same way as a married couple. It also applies to same-sex couples. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Whats even more fucked is that certain states in Australia now allow mistresses to make claims over their partner�s assets. Like, wtf? Homos bringing about the decay of civilisation. |
I feel like that won't affect people who are married to someone else.
Will it? Otherwise that's just stupid.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EddieZilker If they're treating it like a common law marriage wouldn't that constitute de facto bigamy? Or are the laws there a little more loose, if you know what I mean? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by EddieZilker If they're treating it like a common law marriage wouldn't that constitute de facto bigamy? Or are the laws there a little more loose, if you know what I mean? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.