TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Logic bus channels
Logic bus channels
Been watching videos on logic and noticed the users send their stuff to buses, so I was wondering is the full signal going to any giving bus, or like with the sends in live, they are choosing the amount to send.. I always thought it was just the amount they require (like the sends) until I noticed 1 guy sent all his percs to a bus and had a filter effect on to sweep them all down at once, meaning the whole signal is being sent before going to the master (so its like in series), at the same time though he also sends multi tracks to a reverb bus and also a delay bus..
In live I have reverbs and delays on sends, but if I want to filter all my percs for example, or compress them together, I would have to send all the track outputs to a new channel (or group them) and do it that way. So is the bus channels in logic a combination of the 2 where you can choose (like in series or parallel)?? Hope this makes sense.
Re: Logic bus channels
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 Been watching videos on logic and noticed the users send their stuff to buses, so I was wondering is the full signal going to any giving bus, or like with the sends in live, they are choosing the amount to send.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 I always thought it was just the amount they require (like the sends) until I noticed 1 guy sent all his percs to a bus and had a filter effect on to sweep them all down at once, meaning the whole signal is being sent before going to the master (so its like in series), at the same time though he also sends multi tracks to a reverb bus and also a delay bus.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 In live I have reverbs and delays on sends, but if I want to filter all my percs for example, or compress them together, I would have to send all the track outputs to a new channel (or group them) and do it that way. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 So is the bus channels in logic a combination of the 2 where you can choose (like in series or parallel)?? Hope this makes sense. |
Are aux tracks in logic another word for return tracks like in live?
I don't know anything about return tracks in Live, I only use Live for simple DJ sets. In Logic Aux tracks are basically the same as audio tracks for all practical purposes. The only real difference is you can't load software instruments on an Aux track input and Aux tracks can accept rewire inputs whereas audio tracks cannot.
By return tracks I mean when you set up a send for say delay or reverb? If you want use a device as a send you would use an aux track to put the device on i.e. delay, then on the desired audio track dial in the amount you need via a send control?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by music2dance2 By return tracks I mean when you set up a send for say delay or reverb? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by music2dance2 If you want use a device as a send you would use an aux track to put the device on i.e. delay, then on the desired audio track dial in the amount you need via a send control? |
Ok cool I get ya, cheers dude.
A really cant word it any better. From your answers Im assuming the "bus" in logic can be used simply as a "bus" where the whole channel(s) output is sent (for whatever reason you like) before it goes to the master outputs, or you can use it as a "return track" where you can dial the required amount of the "reverb" (for example) to be applied to that sound..
I understand how it all works I setup buses in live, was just confused because in the logic video the bus tracks and the return tracks are all labeled bus1 bus2 etc.
Cheers
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 A really cant word it any better. From your answers Im assuming the "bus" in logic can be used simply as a "bus" where the whole channel(s) output is sent (for whatever reason you like) before it goes to the master outputs, or you can use it as a "return track" where you can dial the required amount of the "reverb" (for example) to be applied to that sound.. I understand how it all works I setup buses in live, was just confused because in the logic video the bus tracks and the return tracks are all labeled bus1 bus2 etc. Cheers |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 A really cant word it any better. From your answers Im assuming the "bus" in logic can be used simply as a "bus" where the whole channel(s) output is sent (for whatever reason you like) before it goes to the master outputs, |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 or you can use it as a "return track" where you can dial the required amount of the "reverb" (for example) to be applied to that sound.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Andy28 I understand how it all works I setup buses in live, was just confused because in the logic video the bus tracks and the return tracks are all labeled bus1 bus2 etc. Cheers |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Eric J Right, I guess Live makes a distinction between whats considered a "grouping" channel used for collecting the output of other channels and a channel used for send inputs. Logic makes no such distinctions. |
Excellent answers as usual from Eric but I would like to clarify a bit further.
When you select a send on a given track in logic, the "return" channel for that is automatically created.
When you use a bus, you can't dictate the amount of that channel you want to "send" to that bus (without pulling down that tracks channel fader). In this respect the bus is absolute, in terms you route all or nothing where as with a send you can send any amount form 0 to 100 % of that track to another destination.
AFAIR (not in front of the computer now), Busses in logic are also absolute in that they re-route the output of that channel to a bus channel, where as a send splits off a copy of the signal leaving the actual output untouched.
Busses themselves cannot be automated as well - you would have to create an aux track and send to that if you wanted it to have automation.
So basically, for applications where you need to have a wet/dry balance, then use a send.
If you want to send one or more tracks to another track then use a bus.
If you want to control the same perameters on several tracks at once, create a group, then select what perameters are to be joined (bear in mind it is relative control so if you have one at 100% volume and the second track at 50%, when you pull down the 100% to the 50% mark the other will now be at 25%).
Hope you get what what I mean.
Thanks, I do understand fully what you guys are saying.
I understand how they work just not familiar with logic..
Cheers
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN Excellent answers as usual from Eric but I would like to clarify a bit further. When you select a send on a given track in logic, the "return" channel for that is automatically created. When you use a bus, you can't dictate the amount of that channel you want to "send" to that bus (without pulling down that tracks channel fader). In this respect the bus is absolute, in terms you route all or nothing where as with a send you can send any amount form 0 to 100 % of that track to another destination. AFAIR (not in front of the computer now), Busses in logic are also absolute in that they re-route the output of that channel to a bus channel, where as a send splits off a copy of the signal leaving the actual output untouched. Busses themselves cannot be automated as well - you would have to create an aux track and send to that if you wanted it to have automation. So basically, for applications where you need to have a wet/dry balance, then use a send. If you want to send one or more tracks to another track then use a bus. If you want to control the same perameters on several tracks at once, create a group, then select what perameters are to be joined (bear in mind it is relative control so if you have one at 100% volume and the second track at 50%, when you pull down the 100% to the 50% mark the other will now be at 25%). Hope you get what what I mean. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.