Sebastien Leger making fun of dubstep is better than dubstep.

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Sebastien Leger making fun of dubstep is better than dubstep.
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

Posted by iammesol on Nov-12-2010 21:01:

Sebastien Leger making fun of dubstep is better than dubstep.

Posted by enydo on Nov-12-2010 21:22:

Not really.

Posted by ziptnf on Nov-12-2010 21:28:

My favorite part is 1:50ish when it looks like he's passed out

Posted by ZeJayMan on Nov-12-2010 22:26:

http://www.myspace.com/blingtikkla

My cousin taking the piss out of dubstep is significantly more hilarious.

Posted by Blake_Jarrell on Nov-12-2010 22:38:

lol @ Sterilex

Posted by hasbone on Nov-13-2010 00:08:

what's that law that says it's impossible to distinguish a parody from the real thing because both are equally ridiculous?

Posted by alphazipbo on Nov-13-2010 00:54:

Too much

Almost got in trouble at work at this hilarity!

Posted by Dr Flow on Nov-13-2010 02:55:

quote:
Originally posted by hasbone
what's that law that says it's impossible to distinguish a parody from the real thing because both are equally ridiculous?

lol....spot on!

Posted by pozz on Nov-13-2010 03:40:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
Dubstep sucks so fucking bad.

out of curiosity... even this?

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Nov-13-2010 03:58:

quote:
Originally posted by pozz
out of curiosity... even this?

Good shit.

Posted by pozz on Nov-13-2010 05:34:

i guess the deletion of the comment can be taken as a negative proof. im glad you like it

Posted by sljiva on Nov-13-2010 05:36:

quote:
Originally posted by pozz
out of curiosity... even this?

When it comes to soulful dubstep, here's the tune of the moment:

Posted by stealthman on Nov-13-2010 06:17:

Needs more wobble.

Posted by Settimo on Nov-13-2010 07:45:

stop fucking talking shit on dubstep, it's some of the most innovative and original music i've heard in years...seriously. you just need to find the good stuff that doesn't sound like death...

quote:
Originally posted by stealthman
Needs more wobble.

how about none

Posted by osterzone on Nov-13-2010 15:49:

quote:
Originally posted by pozz
out of curiosity... even this?

How does that sound like dubstep at all?

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Nov-13-2010 16:07:

quote:
Originally posted by osterzone
How does that sound like dubstep at all?

Did you not listen to a single word anyone said in your last stupid "dubstep sucks" thread? Dubstep can be any music that:

1. Is around 140bpm
2. Has 2-step rhythms
3. Uses half/double time tempo dynamics.

You'd appreciate why this sets dubstep apart from other genres if you'd ever set foot on a dancefloor and ever danced to any of the music you chat shit about.

Posted by Woony on Nov-13-2010 16:34:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Did you not listen to a single word anyone said in your last stupid "dubstep sucks" thread? Dubstep can be any music that:

1. Is around 140bpm
2. Has 2-step rhythms
3. Uses half/double time tempo dynamics.

You'd appreciate why this sets dubstep apart from other genres if you'd ever set foot on a dancefloor and ever danced to any of the music you chat shit about.

I think a much better description would be:

1. It has huge amounts of subbass

I don't think BPM is a characteristic. There are many, many tracks that are not in the 140 range. And people are toying around a lot with different rythm patterns even though it's often hard to classify those things as Dubstep or not. But the bass is really what keeps the genre together hence why many people simply call it "bass music".

Posted by Woony on Nov-13-2010 16:40:

quote:
Originally posted by ZeJayMan
http://www.myspace.com/blingtikkla

My cousin taking the piss out of dubstep is significantly more hilarious.

The sad thing is... with some better production in the non-wobble parts this track could actually get in the Beatport Dubstep top 10 chart or something ridiculous like that.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Nov-13-2010 17:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Woonyxoxo
I think a much better description would be:

1. It has huge amounts of subbass

I don't think BPM is a characteristic. There are many, many tracks that are not in the 140 range. And people are toying around a lot with different rythm patterns even though it's often hard to classify those things as Dubstep or not. But the bass is really what keeps the genre together hence why many people simply call it "bass music".

"Bass music" doesn't just refer to dubstep, you know. It includes jungle, dub, 2-step and other urban British-Caribbean styles. And an increasing amount of dubstep doesn't use much or any sub-bass, just as it isn't all at 140bpm.

Posted by ZeJayMan on Nov-13-2010 19:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Woonyxoxo
The sad thing is... with some better production in the non-wobble parts this track could actually get in the Beatport Dubstep top 10 chart or something ridiculous like that.

about bitch tikklaz:: eclectic like brangelina collecting babies, bassz' nasty like a dog with da rabies, special efx from the movie scaries, production skillz that neva varies

hahahhahaha

Posted by Adam420 on Nov-13-2010 20:19:

'nuff said

Posted by Settimo on Nov-13-2010 22:51:

^ JACK SPARROW FUCKING FTW

dubstep

Posted by enydo on Nov-13-2010 23:56:

quote:
Originally posted by pozz
out of curiosity... even this?

Any additional info on this? Possible release, etc.

Posted by Lews on Nov-14-2010 00:23:

quote:
Originally posted by enydo
Any additional info on this? Possible release, etc.

Looks like it was a white label, only pressed 500 times. I could only find one copy for sale on the internet and for like $100. Shame, because that song was fucking wicked.

Posted by enydo on Nov-14-2010 00:26:

Oh wowwwwww. Shit.

Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »