TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Bit rate crusher effect... Why was it invented?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 02:11:

Bit rate crusher effect... Why was it invented?

Why was this horrid effect even created? Its just a cheap and ultimately nasty. It seems to work to a degree with harder styles, but I think it is just a cheap feature to throw in on any fx unit. Im specifically talking about the VESTAX VFX unit which does not even have a pitch modulation wheel, you have to press miniature buttons to transpose. The VFX has 3 user preset setting and to this day they hav not released any fx's except more lameness!! Shame to vestax! Cutting corner's and keeping there customer's hostage, well done!


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Dec-13-2010 03:56:

some of the biggest rap hits used the akai sampler and at the time it had a lower bit depth. The result was a somewhat more crunchy sound. It is also in so many tracks that probably some of your favourite tunes use it. Every mix down to 16 bit uses it. It is everywhere. You just don't know what you are doing and you have a shitty mixer. The problem is you, not the effect.

even the fader in the hands of an idiot can be deadly.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 05:07:

You should see a doctor!

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
some of the biggest rap hits used the akai sampler and at the time it had a lower bit depth. The result was a somewhat more crunchy sound. It is also in so many tracks that probably some of your favourite tunes use it. Every mix down to 16 bit uses it. It is everywhere. You just don't know what you are doing and you have a shitty mixer. The problem is you, not the effect.

even the fader in the hands of an idiot can be deadly.


Thanks for your uneducated valued judgment but it is not valid... try again idiot!


Posted by orTof�nChiLd on Dec-13-2010 05:20:

pwned


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Dec-13-2010 05:23:

that is your rebuttal ? It isn't valid because you think it is wrong? Quit wanking and do a fucking search you kangaroo molesting twat. Bit crushing is bit reduction. One of the most important elements in audio production and a common tool used all over the place probably as much as that fucking cher effect.

Every single cd available for purchase lets just say in the last 10 years has "bit crushing " going on. The Akai MPC60 , the tool that pretty much made Rap , guess what, only had a bit depth of 12. Bit reduction once again.Every

The problem is that you don't know what the fuck you are doing with your shitty mixer. The effect is just an algorithm commonly used for audio in an artistic way.

And don't even bother with the uneducated low blow bs. I'm without a doubt the smartest person you've had the luxury to talk with in a really long time. Unfortunately , you are one of the daftest. I suppose the funniest part is that all those Vengeance samples in your track , well they are fucking coated with bit crushing. Itis pretty much the genre's cliche effect. Now fuck off.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 07:03:

Man over board!

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
that is your rebuttal ? It isn't valid because you think it is wrong? Quit wanking and do a fucking search you kangaroo molesting twat. Bit crushing is bit reduction. One of the most important elements in audio production and a common tool used all over the place probably as much as that fucking cher effect.

Every single cd available for purchase lets just say in the last 10 years has "bit crushing " going on. The Akai MPC60 , the tool that pretty much made Rap , guess what, only had a bit depth of 12. Bit reduction once again.Every

The problem is that you don't know what the fuck you are doing with your shitty mixer. The effect is just an algorithm commonly used for audio in an artistic way.

And don't even bother with the uneducated low blow bs. I'm without a doubt the smartest person you've had the luxury to talk with in a really long time. Unfortunately , you are one of the daftest. I suppose the funniest part is that all those Vengeance samples in your track , well they are fucking coated with bit crushing. Itis pretty much the genre's cliche effect. Now fuck off.


I'd rather someone else tell me how shit I am, not here to argue or be the smartest tech guru. stop your crap! I am a label trying to promote artist you schmuck!


Posted by Stu Cox on Dec-13-2010 07:55:

There's a big difference between using bit reduction to fit specific hardware (i.e. "I've recorded it at 16/24-bit but my sampler can only handle 12") and a DJ effect designed to drop the bit depth down as far as 2 bits.

And yes, bit reduction as an effect was probably first used to give certain sounds a crunchy retro sound in studio production, then someone just decided it would be a good idea to put it in DJ FX boxes... it's really easy to make, so why not eh?

As with any effect, it's best used sparingly and subtly IMO. With most effects you can make them more subtle by being careful with your wet/dry mix, but having your wet/dry at half-mast with a bitcrusher can sound a bit odd. Another way to keep it subtle is to only apply it to 1 channel when you've got 2 playing - e.g. use it to crunch up one track as you remove it from the mix.

It can sound quite cool just quickly sweeping out all of the bits across the last bar or two at the end of a phrase, then flicking straight back to full bit depth at the start of the next phrase when a bassline comes in or something, but again - use sparingly.


At the end of the day, if you don't like it, you don't have to use it!


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 09:37:

Most appreciated

quote:
Originally posted by Stu Cox
There's a big difference between using bit reduction to fit specific hardware (i.e. "I've recorded it at 16/24-bit but my sampler can only handle 12") and a DJ effect designed to drop the bit depth down as far as 2 bits.

And yes, bit reduction as an effect was probably first used to give certain sounds a crunchy retro sound in studio production, then someone just decided it would be a good idea to put it in DJ FX boxes... it's really easy to make, so why not eh?

As with any effect, it's best used sparingly and subtly IMO. With most effects you can make them more subtle by being careful with your wet/dry mix, but having your wet/dry at half-mast with a bitcrusher can sound a bit odd. Another way to keep it subtle is to only apply it to 1 channel when you've got 2 playing - e.g. use it to crunch up one track as you remove it from the mix.

It can sound quite cool just quickly sweeping out all of the bits across the last bar or two at the end of a phrase, then flicking straight back to full bit depth at the start of the next phrase when a bassline comes in or something, but again - use sparingly.


At the end of the day, if you don't like it, you don't have to use it!


Thankyou for your advice, it has given me inspiration. I am going to use it sparingly. At least you have understood the question. You are spot on, have a nice day


Posted by Zak McKracken on Dec-13-2010 12:28:

great thread lol. the effect you talk about suck, and i think daft punk where among those who made it popular in edm as an effect. robot rock is a prime example.


Posted by PivotTechno on Dec-13-2010 14:18:

Re: Man over board!

T'is a poor workperson who blames the tools of their trade.

quote:
Originally posted by cabledigital
I am a label trying to promote artist you schmuck!


How so?


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Dec-13-2010 17:19:

Re: Man over board!

quote:
Originally posted by cabledigital
I am a label trying to promote artist you schmuck!


you are a label ? Do labels need to eat food ? No what we have here is a classic example of an idiot talking shit then throwing a tantrum when someone tells him he is off his rocker.


Posted by Scrittah on Dec-13-2010 20:36:

Re: Man over board!

quote:
Originally posted by cabledigital
I'd rather someone else tell me how shit I am, not here to argue or be the smartest tech guru. stop your crap! I am a label trying to promote artist you schmuck!


I don't think it's possible to beat a comeback like that.


Posted by djsaekone on Dec-13-2010 20:58:

why is mad for brad always so angry....

i like the bit crusher effect every once in a while in a mix


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Dec-13-2010 21:01:

I have this medical condition. Basically i'm allergic to morons. I wouldn't say i'm mad. Annoyed ? Quite. This guy is a loon and if I can help just one moron realize he is being an idiot, well i've done humanity a service.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 23:49:

Re: Re: Man over board!

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
you are a label ? Do labels need to eat food ? No what we have here is a classic example of an idiot talking shit then throwing a tantrum when someone tells him he is off his rocker.

THIS IS 4 MAD4BRAD ******

Ive got my answer now from better members than you ") So guess what that means you can fuck off!! If you even read the 'original' message I'm sure you wouldnt of started acting like a typical American pompous twat who's reality it so distorted that they have to come to forums to tell people the way it is, you live for it and I'M LAUGHIG AT YOU WHILE IGNORING YOU NOW HAHA.. I'm the one who asked a simple question and youre the one losing sleep over it.. Do you really think i'm that dumb? uh oh now im asking for it.. Bring it on Fag!


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 23:51:

quote:
Originally posted by djsaekone
why is mad for brad always so angry....

i like the bit crusher effect every once in a while in a mix


because he is small


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-13-2010 23:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
I have this medical condition. Basically i'm allergic to morons. I wouldn't say i'm mad. Annoyed ? Quite. This guy is a loon and if I can help just one moron realize he is being an idiot, well i've done humanity a service.


Checked you and you done nothing and never will do anything for this human race. Capable generous men nurture victims they don't create them like you!

Moron/Idiot yeah I'd call you that!


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-14-2010 00:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
some of the biggest rap hits used the akai sampler and at the time it had a lower bit depth. The result was a somewhat more crunchy sound. It is also in so many tracks that probably some of your favourite tunes use it. Every mix down to 16 bit uses it. It is everywhere. You just don't know what you are doing and you have a shitty mixer. The problem is you, not the effect.

even the fader in the hands of an idiot can be deadly.





You are so rude and I really have not appreciated one word you have said.

You obviously do have a severe medical condition and i pity your souls. If you read my initial question.. 'Why was this horrid effect even created?' I'm not talking about mixdown etc.. I'm talking about djing. I know its in every tune blablabla.. You really dont get it!!

Ok mad4brad i already know that tech stuff i was wanting to know why it was an effect on the vci300? You should go to your closest redneck bar and grab the shotgun from behind the bar, point the gun at your head.. oh make sure that there is bullets in there, then point the gun back at your head and pull the trigger.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-14-2010 00:13:

Re: Re: Man over board!

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
T'is a poor workperson who blames the tools of their trade.

Yes I do sometimes blame my equipment if the effect is irritating and useless!

How so?


Been promoting techno, trance, electro & house mainly. I have recently changed the label to cable digital from cable records. Based in Australia the label has not moved any mountains as of yet, but with help from hoes like mad4brad its just a matter of time!


Posted by PivotTechno on Dec-14-2010 01:10:

I don't think you're getting my question - I'm asking how you can be a label trying to promote artists with such a hostile, closed-minded attitude. Your anger (4 replies in a row telling off one person?) makes Mad for Brad (who actually does know what he's taling about, despite your protestations to contrary) look like a Jain monk in comparison.

You might want to consider a career in ship-in-a-bottle building instead, I've heard it's very relaxing.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-14-2010 01:32:

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
I don't think you're getting my question - I'm asking how you can be a label trying to promote artists with such a hostile, closed-minded attitude. Your anger (4 replies in a row telling off one person?) makes Mad for Brad (who actually does know what he's taling about, despite your protestations to contrary) look like a Jain monk in comparison.

You might want to consider a career in ship-in-a-bottle building instead, I've heard it's very relaxing.


I am far from hostile and close minded, there we go another judgement based on no education! You have no right to judge. I created this post and mad4brad can try and boss his way into every thread and try make it complicated but at the end of it all he will end up with 50 minor heart attacks within the space of a minute. Therefor Pivot Tech you have voided your own comment. He deserved every reply of mine and I am ready to give more pain to people who feed off it. You on the other hand dont deserve to be abused by me as I know your only commenting and I appreciate your evaluation but you don't know me so unfortunately it doesn't change my opinion of him.


Posted by jupiterone on Dec-14-2010 01:43:

quote:
Originally posted by djsaekone
why is mad for brad always so angry....

i like the bit crusher effect every once in a while in a mix


do you blame him for being so angry in such a retarded thread?


Posted by PivotTechno on Dec-14-2010 01:48:

quote:
Originally posted by cabledigital
I am ready to give more pain to people who feed off it.


I've heard that's how all the big labels sell millions.


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Dec-14-2010 02:08:

my gosh 4 posts in a row. That is a little creepy. If it is of any consolation, I don't hate you for being an idiot. You ramble like a little child and I answer your question quite well. Had you just been normal and asked something like, anyone else hate this effect, I probably would not of felt the need to kick you in the junk.

I'm pretty sure anyone in the production forum can vouch that I am definitely not angry. they will also vouch that I look fucking good in dungarees. You ask a dumb ignorant question in quite the dickheadish manner and you are surprised by the lack of love.


Posted by cabledigital on Dec-14-2010 02:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
my gosh 4 posts in a row. That is a little creepy. If it is of any consolation, I don't hate you for being an idiot. You ramble like a little child and I answer your question quite well. Had you just been normal and asked something like, anyone else hate this effect, I probably would not of felt the need to kick you in the junk.

I'm pretty sure anyone in the production forum can vouch that I am definitely not angry. they will also vouch that I look fucking good in dungarees. You ask a dumb ignorant question in quite the dickheadish manner and you are surprised by the lack of love.


No, its not creepy.. It just works, got ur back up so i could pound you from behind!


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.