TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- I'm flucking tired of cords.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by meriter on Jan-27-2011 05:12:

Evil1 I'm flucking tired of cords.

Didn't Tesla invent cordless power or some shit back in like the 1900's? What's the damn hold up? I'm tired of managing this horrifying spiders-web of tangled shit weave every time I want to move a fucking desk or unplug a piece of gear. Hurry the hell up technology. Also someone should invent a way to make things hover in 3 dimensional space. I shouldn't have to lean over and give myself scoliosis every time I want to edit some patch on my shitty outdated synth that was popular in 1996. Everything should be cordless by now. I'm sure the technology already exists but it's that damn "planned obsolescence" that's stunting the very basis of human evolution. There's no money in making the world a better place. The money is in small incremental improvements so you never have the 'latest and greatest' thing and even when you do it's obsolete in a few months so you have to keep buying and buying and buying just to stay ahead of the game. Fuck that noise we're supposed to have flying cars by now. Society made that promise back in the 80's and where are we? Sure there's bomb-ass multi-touch screen shit out there but it won't be available to the public for YEARS because they have to squeeze as much money out of us as possible. Look at the iPad, the next thing Apple is going to release (hopefully) is the Macbook Touch, which is what everyone wanted to begin with. The iPad is stupid and shitty and only serves it's purpose as a stepping stone to a multi-touch laptop with stylus functionality.

There are videos out there RIGHT NOW of holographic projections in fucking mid-air and you're telling me touch-screen capability is JUST NOW getting popular? The rent is too damn high and my car runs off dinosaurs.


Posted by J.L. on Jan-27-2011 06:32:

*waits for someone to come in and say VST's are the answer and hardware vs. software debate to follow*


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-27-2011 17:18:

if u ******s stopped worshiping analog, technology might improve. but as long as you guys keep buying crap, so that crappy companies can continue living out of selling crap, no-ones gonna make new crap. most of the technology is already here, its just that the companys find it easier to push the same shit as long as stupid humans continue to buy it. fucking morons. touch screens is probably 20 years old btw, explains alot how humans hate technology. fuck capitalism.


Posted by Kysora on Jan-27-2011 18:08:

I can't think of many popular electronics that are wirelessly powered. Probably because using that technology would jack the price of things up a lot more than using a simple power cord, and most consumers would rather exercise basic organizational skills than pay out the ass for a slightly more convenient setup.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-27-2011 18:12:

I'm flucking tired of chords.

9ths, 7ths, 5ths, diads, majors, minors, diminished, and augmented not to mention the circle of fifths. They're pretentious and too complex.


Posted by sicc on Jan-27-2011 19:03:

Its all the business man. All about the fucking money. They will keep releasing new versions of what you just bought because they only care about your money. Thats how consumerism works, fuck thats how AMERICA works. Somethings never change -.- stagnant in the illusion of freedom, we may never change until America collapses under its own chaotic cluster fucked power craze.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-27-2011 19:11:

i cant wait to the fall of america and capitalism. it will be years of chaos which i usually am good at.


Posted by sicc on Jan-27-2011 19:15:

quote:
Originally posted by ken_lee
i cant wait to the fall of america and capitalism. it will be years of chaos which i usually am good at.


Agreed. I hope I'm alive to see it. Then I can laugh and yell "YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED!!! OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!"


Posted by itsamemario on Jan-27-2011 19:16:

i make chordless techno


Posted by Brandt Slater on Jan-27-2011 19:43:

The technology is there. Depends on how much you're willing to spend. It doesn't matter what format your work in. Analog and digital have coincided with each other for the last twenty years. If you're tired of dealing with cable, then invest the money on an all wireless environment.


Posted by Brandt Slater on Jan-27-2011 19:44:

quote:
Originally posted by ken_lee
i cant wait to the fall of america and capitalism. it will be years of chaos which i usually am good at.


So negative. Should we send you happy pills?


Posted by johncannons1 on Jan-27-2011 22:16:

Re: I'm flucking tired of cords.

quote:
Originally posted by meriter


Vst's dont need a chord.


Posted by Kysora on Jan-27-2011 22:30:

lmao at people equating lack of wireless technology with capitalism and the end of america. you're all tools.


Posted by sicc on Jan-27-2011 22:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Kysora
lmao at people equating lack of wireless technology with capitalism and the end of america. you're all tools.


LOL. True, but, the way that technology is sold is the same as all products. Which all comes back to companies doing w/e they have to to make the most money; releasing newer more updated versions of their product frequently. The whole opium thing though was quite a tangent.


Posted by sicc on Jan-28-2011 00:17:

This is all so production related


Posted by DJ RANN on Jan-28-2011 01:05:

Back on topic, wireless electricity technology is actually here.

I remember seeing this film made in the fifties where a guy from the future came back in time (to the 40's) and was laughing that we still get our power from cables.

60 years on and we're only just making it a lab possibility.

MIT have a project where they've been able to power a flatscreen TV from a remote source, but then further away you get the more power drop you have, and even at 1 foot it's horribly inefficient.

There is another source though, at a British university last year they managed to teleport a laser beam over a distance of 4 foot. The chinese then attempted it and manged a couple of miles. They reckon that aside from the setup energy or the devices needed to make the TX and RX, it basically lost next to nothing in terms of it's own energy.

So soon, all our things could be powered off teleported lasers. Even saying that out loud is cool.

Back on to the heroin, you have to realize a very large amount of drugs, especially heroin and coke, come in to the country through official channels receiving bribes and payoffs. The rest comes through commercial cargo planes and shipping containers, hence why NJ gets a lot of it. Not to mention it's the fucking shithole of the earth and if I lived there I'd probably find as much black tar as I could to numb the pain.

Howard Marks, (Mr Nice) said British secret service and security agencies turned a blind eye and even facilitated his global import/export system, as he was working for them while doing so. They denied it, but when he was finally "caught", he got a ridiculously low sentence considering the sheer scale of his operation, not to mention an early release.


Posted by Jason_R on Jan-28-2011 09:04:

http://www.economist.com/node/16295708


'ANYONE whose mobile phone has ever run out of juice�which means, these days, more than half the world�s population�will like the idea of getting electrical power out of the air. The notion is far from new. A little over a century ago, the inventor Nikola Tesla drew up ambitious plans to transmit electrical power without wires. He carried out a series of experiments in which electric lights were illuminated via electrostatic induction, by connecting them to metal sheets suspended in a strong electric field produced by a distant transmitter. In 1898 he proposed a �world system� of giant towers that would form both a global wireless communications network and a means of delivering electricity over large areas without wires.

The construction of the first such tower, the Wardenclyffe Tower, on Long Island, began in 1901. Tesla�s backers included the financier J.P. Morgan, who invested $150,000. But before the tower was completed, Morgan and the other backers pulled out. They worried that the delivery of electricity through the air could not be metered, and there would be nothing to stop people from helping' themselves'

I�m not into conspiracy theories as such but it is naive to believe that solution to the vast majority of the world problems do not already exist. The global elite is hell bent on securing more power at an alarming rate and globalisation

I believe that there is viable alternatives to oil but as per the above to many people stand to loose to much money.


Posted by meriter on Jan-28-2011 15:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Jason_R
http://www.economist.com/node/16295708


I�m not into conspiracy theories as such but it is naive to believe that solution to the vast majority of the world problems do not already exist. The global elite is hell bent on securing more power at an alarming rate and globalisation

I believe that there is viable alternatives to oil but as per the above to many people stand to loose to much money.


This is exactly true and I'd like to offer a quote by one of my favorite people Robert Anton Wilson:

"We live in an age of artificial scarcity, maintained by ignorance and fear. the government has been paying farmers not to grow food for fifty years--while millions starve. Labor unions, business and government conspire to hold back the microprocessor revolution - because none of them know how to deal with the massive unemployment it will cause. (Fuller's books could tell them.) The utilities advertise continually that "solar power is at least forty years in the future" when my friend Karl Hess, and hundreds of others already live in largely solar powered houses. These propaganda advertisements are just a delaying action because the utilities still haven't figured out how to put a meter between us and the sun."

Again, there's no money in making the world a better place. I think if we really knew the severity of the situation there would no doubt be a global uprising almost immediately.


Posted by Swamper on Jan-30-2011 00:35:

I got rid of the garbage polluting this thread... it's actually an interesting topic


Posted by UXC on Jan-30-2011 01:42:

The amount of technology that is hidden from the average human is mind boggling, on top of what is being suppressed from development.

All this talk makes me sad to be frank. Money Money Money Moneeeeeaaayyy.


Posted by DJ RANN on Jan-30-2011 01:50:

Actually, I've been looking in to wireless audio recently and I'm amazed how few options there are.

You've got sonos, which I've installed a few times but you're getting in to home automation territory with so much crap you'll likely never use, not to mention $1000+ at trade pricing but the most basic of systems and a dedicated internet connection etc.

You've then a got a few wireless stereo and satellite speaker setups, most of which sound like utter crap, unless you get in to B&O territory but again the cost is even more ridiculous.

So I found this system called soundcast which lets you transmit and receive audio up to distances of 300ft (150 indoors and through walls) and uses the similar technology as wireless phones (albeit different bands to avoid interference).

Looks like I'm going to try them and I'll report back here.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-30-2011 09:34:

apple with their airtunes/airport express is the closest solution, but hardly any quality dac in there. also its meant for iTunes only but its possible to buy a program called airfoil that allows you to stream whatever from your computer to the airport. and it has optical output so you could connect a external DAC from there again, or use DSP speakers maybe. one airport next to each monitor would also work actually, making things pretty wireless. i dont know about delay though. Give it time, as DSP monitors will slowly take over, inbuild wireless solutions will come after as they are related.


Posted by Richard Butler on Jan-30-2011 09:58:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter

Again, there's no money in making the world a better place. I think if we really knew the severity of the situation there would no doubt be a global uprising almost immediately.



Renault, Nissan, GM and plenty others have but hundreds of billions into electric cars which are now beinmg sold and are the future.

Plenty of medicines and treatments have made the world obstensibly better, although I would argue over population is a negative side effect and a major problem given the finitie resources.

Back on topic > my cables are no hassle.I makke sure they all dangle in thier own little space without becomming entangled. It's all in the original way you set it up. Mind you I dont have much hardware so it's perhaps easier on account of this!


Posted by voblivion on Jan-30-2011 16:50:

cables and tangles

Hello

Yes.

There are those "cable tidy" devices that keep the wires neat.

Then you could group "power wires" away from signal wires....keep it
all tidy...

It should only take ONE set up....if the studio is never being moved...
right...

For occasional gear that is being moved...leave a permanent set of
cables at the common spot....then get other transportable cables that
can be whipped into action if need be....

that's my take on it.

V.


Posted by meriter on Jan-30-2011 18:20:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
Actually, I've been looking in to wireless audio recently and I'm amazed how few options there are.

You've got sonos, which I've installed a few times but you're getting in to home automation territory with so much crap you'll likely never use, not to mention $1000+ at trade pricing but the most basic of systems and a dedicated internet connection etc.

You've then a got a few wireless stereo and satellite speaker setups, most of which sound like utter crap, unless you get in to B&O territory but again the cost is even more ridiculous.

So I found this system called soundcast which lets you transmit and receive audio up to distances of 300ft (150 indoors and through walls) and uses the similar technology as wireless phones (albeit different bands to avoid interference).

Looks like I'm going to try them and I'll report back here.


and even this is on the casual listening side of things. What options are there for serious music production? I haven't found any.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.