TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- How's this progression sound?


Posted by Seandroid on Jan-30-2011 12:39:

How's this progression sound?

Progression test by Seandroid

Just testing things out. Not interested in the mix or synth quality or anything just what you guys think of the progression


Posted by Raphie on Jan-30-2011 14:29:

I find it way to difficult, this is one of those progressions that lead nowhere and at the end someone thinks "owh let's close the loop here" and the whole thing starts again, no cohesion, no natural anticipation.


Posted by tehlord on Jan-30-2011 16:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
I find it way to difficult, this is one of those progressions that lead nowhere and at the end someone thinks "owh let's close the loop here" and the whole thing starts again, no cohesion, no natural anticipation.


spot on tbh

sounds like it was put in note by note with no real feel for melody


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-30-2011 18:49:

It's a bit of an odd circle, musically. Structurally, it's fine, but it seems to dispel the tension it builds, once it starts up the scale, especially in the last few measures. It's actually very anti-climactic and has a very artificial feel to it.

The rhythmic cadence also takes away from it. Parts, where it could get interesting, are ruined when new chords fall straight on the down-beat of the next measure. Preceding chords seem to be entirely too obliterated by their successor which destroys potentially related voicing with whole-sale dismissal and replacement.

In short, musically, on a technical level, it's flawless, but in terms of soul, it has none.


Posted by Raphie on Jan-30-2011 19:24:

Eddie, you put a smile on my face every day

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
It's a bit of an odd circle, musically. Structurally, it's fine, but it seems to dispel the tension it builds, once it starts up the scale, especially in the last few measures. It's actually very anti-climactic and has a very artificial feel to it.

The rhythmic cadence also takes away from it. Parts, where it could get interesting, are ruined when new chords fall straight on the down-beat of the next measure. Preceding chords seem to be entirely too obliterated by their successor which destroys potentially related voicing with whole-sale dismissal and replacement.

In short, musically, on a technical level, it's flawless, but in terms of soul, it has none.


Posted by Kysora on Jan-30-2011 19:59:

I lost interest by about the 5th or 6th chord change, it just moves around too much. That last chord is a rather dull end to a progression that's so long as well


Posted by aNYthing on Jan-30-2011 23:26:

First 10 seconds: that's interesting. But then like everyone else said, interest is ruined. Loop that piano and 2x and then stop. the rest of the melody does seem very artificial.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-30-2011 23:36:

I actually think if you took it as the basis for the beginning of a genetic algorithm someone could progress into something really interesting and beautiful. It shouldn't ever be a standing loop, though. Have it play through, once, and then make small but significant changes to it, which give it more character, each succession.


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Jan-31-2011 00:10:

Don't really understand why everyone finds it so hard to follow. It is ,a textbook progression used in hundreds of EDM tracks and it only involves 3 chords. I think some you don't have the ability to hear something out of context and make the translation in your head. I though it was good. Needs to be refined a bit but at least you aren't restricting the melody to chord tones which ends up sounding so stale and boring.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-31-2011 00:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
Don't really understand why everyone finds it so hard to follow. It is ,a textbook progression used in hundreds of EDM tracks and it only involves 3 chords. I think some you don't have the ability to hear something out of context and make the translation in your head. I though it was good. Needs to be refined a bit but at least you aren't restricting the melody to chord tones which ends up sounding so stale and boring.


This was written by my girlfriend: this man sux cox

She's going to graduate to middle school soon.

Anyway, I thought it was easy (even though maybe I got some of my theory discussion wrong - where the hell were you, today, Richie?) to follow but it was clunky and kind of cheesy.

^^PEDO^^!!!! BTW, you guys should probably just let me review your music, cause he SUCKS.

Let's hear it for my little seventh grader. She's very cute, isn't she?









Veeery cute!


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Jan-31-2011 01:04:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
this man sux cox



now you can't prove that.


Posted by Kysora on Jan-31-2011 04:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
Don't really understand why everyone finds it so hard to follow.


Moving around too much isn't the same as hard to follow

As a progression on its own, it's pretty lifeless. I'm sure it can be turned into something nice within the context of a full song but with the melody that's there now it's rather boring. Like Eddie said, there's nothing wrong with it but the answer to OP's question, "How's this progression sound?", well it sounds like little more than a standard progression supported by a weak melody played by synths that were slapped together. I can't really give it praise because as a progression it's nothing new or interesting and there's not enough of a song in this sample to make up for that.


Posted by Raphie on Jan-31-2011 07:46:

A good progression gives you instant goosebumps from anticipation and fulfilment, if not, you can be political correct and call it "interesting" but in reality it's just shite.

Everybody is programmed differently, so my ideal progression might not be yours, but i can not imagine anyone thinking with this progression wow.. gimme more.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-31-2011 18:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
now you can't prove that.


I can so. But it'll cost ya.












Posted by Beatflux on Jan-31-2011 20:22:

i WOULD MAKE love to this progression AT A VERY low VOLUME.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.