TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Serious question about the future of EDM production
Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by meriter on Jan-30-2011 18:10:

Arrow Serious question about the future of EDM production

How realistic is it, at this point in time right now, to create full-blown commercial quality productions ready for release using ONLY software VSTs and VSTi's? Additionally... if the answer is 'not very', how long do you think it'll take until you can get the power of, say, the Motif XF or the Virus TI2 in a VSTi? Which soft synths out there right now would you say are comparable? Anyone have any good examples of current releases that were made solely with software instruments?

The reason I ask this is because I've been moving from place to place over the last 3 years or so, and I've come to find hauling a studio of shit to be extraordinarily tedious. Not to mention the buildup/breakdown, cost of power consumption ect.

So I've been considering the possibilities of a truly 'portable' recording studio.

With the way things are moving, trying to plan for the future is getting more and more difficult, but that doesn't stop one from trying.

The only thing I'm having trouble visualizing is mixing and mastering without sufficient monitors, but I suppose a good solid pair of headphones or in-ear monitors could do the trick if you got good at it. What do you guys think? Can you do it all on a laptop? I mean dynamic rich quality productions not lifeless over-compressed preset pig shit.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-30-2011 18:17:

I'm the case study at trying to do just that - making full-blown production with severe technological restrictions. I'll submit that a lot more of my problems reside on the operator error side of the equation than anything to do with restricted access to state-of-the-art technologies in terms of software and hardware, but there are toys I'd love to have that I think would greatly enhance my ability to create well-rounded music.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-30-2011 18:30:

all my tracks so far are made in Reason only. Its no problem at all man. you need a decent laptop / macbook pro and a daw and some headphones. nothign more. infact its pretty stupid thinking you need a studio for making EDM. but its nice to have some proper monitors+soundcard in addition though, and maybe a midicontroller. software is better, easier, faster, cheaper, more flexible and more accurate than hardware. analog sucks. soon all serious monitors will be digital too, i cant wait.


Posted by cryophonik on Jan-30-2011 18:34:

Re: Serious question about the future of EDM production

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
How realistic is it, at this point in time right now, to create full-blown commercial quality productions ready for release using ONLY software VSTs and VSTi's?


I think we passed that point some time ago. There's nothing stopping people from making commercial quality tracks using software only (not including vocals, of course).

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
Additionally... if the answer is 'not very', how long do you think it'll take things to progress until hardware synths are phased out completely?


That will never happen. This is the problem with many "producers" - they fail to comprehend that there are people called "musicians" who actually need/want to play an instrument, rather than sit on their fat asses in front of a computer screen. Sorry if I sound like a condescending ass here, but c'mon people - get off your fucking "all-you-need-is-software" crusade. Goddamn that's gone beyond annoying. If you like software and/or don't know how to play an instrument and don't want to learn, then knock yourself out. But there will always be people who prefer to work with hardware and play an actual keyboard in both live and studio situations. And not everybody makes their purchase decisions based on how cheap (or free/easy to pirate) an instrument is. There are many musicians out there who will spend a lot of money to own a fine instrument(s), and I guarantee you that will never change. [/rant]


Posted by djshire on Jan-30-2011 18:46:

NAMM was what, two weeks ago?

The only things that I can remember on the purely software front being a big deal were Omnisphere 1.5 and BTs Stutter Edit. What was everything else? Hardware. Synths, controllers, various pieces of outboard gear....hardware is not dead.

I have a buddy who used to be in a couple of different bands in the 80s, and he never sold his gear. He even has a freakin Memorymoog, and that thing is worth what....$3K? More? And that's just one piece of what he has....I can't remember everything that he has, but I think he could get about $10K for all his stuff.

There will always be hardware buyers, there always will be people who want something physical to play on....and not just a midi keyboard. I'm a example of that. I plan on getting NI Komplete 7, but also a Roland Jp-8080 and a Doepfer Dark Energy (I like the acid sound). I could just have a full-on software setup, but what fun is that?

While it's great that in this day and age, you could just get the bare minimum of hardware and doing everything "in-the-box", there's always gonna be people that wont.

And now taking a look at recent posts since I hit reply, what Cryo said as well.


Posted by meriter on Jan-30-2011 18:48:

Cryo I totally agree with you man. Another perhaps hidden reason I'm asking this question is because I'm considering selling my Motif ES 6 and my Virus B desktop synth. Nothing quite like the hands on experience.. BUT... the Motif alone weighs like 80 pounds and if I could get the same sound quality out of a VSTi and control it with a small midi controller, that's very well an option for me. Do I want to part with this amazing beautiful piece of gear of course not. But I'm also broke as fuck and seriously thinking about selling everything I own and working on an organic farm in New Zealand.

EDIT: What I meant by 'phased out' simply meant if you could compress the capabilities of a popular hardware synth into a VSTi and control it with a smaller more compact interface like a midi controller or even just on screen with multi-touch. I'm aware people are never going to stop buying hardware for the performance aspect and I don't want to have this discussion ever again


Posted by cryophonik on Jan-30-2011 19:06:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
I'm aware people are never going to stop buying hardware for the performance aspect and I don't want to have this discussion ever again


Sorry meriter, my rant wasn't aimed at you - it was aimed at those people who we see constantly insisting that hardware is a waste of money, software is better because it's cheaper/free, easier, etc. Those people have such a limited understanding of the music world that they can't see beyond their own laptop. And, that's fine with me, it's just that it gets so annoying when they insist that their tunnel vision should apply to everybody. They fail to realize that not everybody is interested in easy/free/cheap - the best musicians aren't the guys who are always looking for shortcuts.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-30-2011 19:10:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
the best musicians aren't the guys who are always settling for shortcuts.


Fixed for truth!










Unless you envy my spartan, utilitarian approach to making music.


Posted by cryophonik on Jan-30-2011 19:17:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Fixed for truth!


Good point.


quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Unless you envy my spartan, utilitarian approach to making music.


Hey, I went to Michigan State, so I envy anything Spartan-related.


Posted by Raphie on Jan-30-2011 19:29:

software is a parallel universe, i meand people who rave over an "Korg MS20" or "MOOG filter" on an iPad.

Software is extrely close to "as good as it gets" since most vsti's can run on a pda and there is really nothing left that brings a modern i7 to it's knees.

So yes full fledged productions can be made totally ITB, even more they ARE already being made. If the question is if you can make songs sound identicalas hardware, using the VSTi's, the answer is no. Does it sound better or worsse? that's for you to decide.


Posted by meriter on Jan-30-2011 19:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie

So yes full fledged productions can be made totally ITB, even more they ARE already being made.


Any examples?


Posted by Notle on Jan-30-2011 20:39:

all lady gaga logic synths and macbook pro only !!


Posted by Raphie on Jan-30-2011 20:41:

All recent productions from UMEK.


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Jan-31-2011 00:32:

the coffin was closed in 2001. The answer is yes. If you aren't able, it is because you suck. Bottom line. I am in awe that this debate even a decade later still has breath left. If you can't get professional results ITB, it is because you aren't very good. Case closed, moving on ...


Posted by kitphillips on Jan-31-2011 03:47:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
Sorry meriter, my rant wasn't aimed at you - it was aimed at those people who we see constantly insisting that hardware is a waste of money, software is better because it's cheaper/free, easier, etc. Those people have such a limited understanding of the music world that they can't see beyond their own laptop. And, that's fine with me, it's just that it gets so annoying when they insist that their tunnel vision should apply to everybody. They fail to realize that not everybody is interested in easy/free/cheap - the best musicians aren't the guys who are always looking for shortcuts.


I'm a musician and I've played guitar for eight years. I have a fender american deluxe strat and regularly play (and appreciate) a taylor acoustic dreadnaught, I've also played piano and been a vocalist for ages. But I think that digital hardware synths are a complete waste of money, because they will always be superceded, have planned obsolescence, poor workflow, and can be replaced by software.

Also, the EDM workflow generally isn't focussed on using "instruments" so much as tools these days, and the modern hardware synth isn't usually built for live tweaking anyway! If someone wants to buy a 303 clone or doepfer I think thats a great idea because its live and tweakable, but a virus seems like a waste of money to me. It could be (and will be eventually) run on a computer, has a clunky interface, slows your workflow because of routing considerations/TI rubbish bugs, has a limited number of voices and randomly drops them in an unpredictable way... Its just not worth it IMO.

If people want to go and spend their hard earned on things like that, then they seem pretty daft to me, and not really aware of their options. But if it makes them happy then why should I care.


Posted by EddieZilker on Jan-31-2011 04:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Mad for Brad
the coffin was closed in 2001. The answer is yes. If you aren't able, it is because you suck. Bottom line. I am in awe that this debate even a decade later still has breath left. If you can't get professional results ITB, it is because you aren't very good. Case closed, moving on ...


It helps to have a good box, a good sound-card, and at least two hard-drives. You also need good software. It can be done on less, but it shouldn't be.


Posted by Lolo on Jan-31-2011 05:07:

I have mixed opinions when reading what you guys post because it was as if some of you still see people using hardware and those using software as different crowds who have nothing in common.

When it comes to those analog recreations, honestly, I can't see any difference between sounds coming from a computer and sounds coming from a dsp-driven motherboard. It's just the use we make of it. Until 2K10, edm musicians used to be non-moving people, being seen as nerds by many including dj's, because they'd spend their whole time at their quad core towers.

This decade will be the one that kills the superstar dj culture and that will see musicians of all kinds get back in control. And for that we need the best weapons. Those that control things well (hardware, whether its full of touch things such as the iPad) and those that sync with the music making process (software).

The sound quality of some (inexpensive after all) software instruments is simply outstanding and surpasses everything I have heard from hardware, including the latest Korg unit because of the amount of samples and their length of course. But I like the Kronos interface from what I've seen.

It's down to manufacturers to get this straight. It's not about making the perfect all-in-one solution anymore unless it's very cheap, it's about making a characterful, almost human instrument that serves a specific cause.


Posted by Raphie on Jan-31-2011 08:11:

So true, for me it's really like if i can do it ITB I would like to do it that way, no use going OTB just for the sake of it, or to hold on to legacy.

so the way it works for me (some with outboard experience might recognize is)

What works well ITB: (for me)
- sequencing
- sampling
- FX (like delay, verbs, filtering, channel EQs)
- Digital synths & VA synths
- percussion (most replacing outboard samplers / romplers)
- channel compression
- Limiting
- mixing (rather a bunch of converter feeding into DAW than working with an external mixer)

What does not work so well ITB
- analog sounds (listen to MOOG, DSI, Vintage ROLAND, it just sounds different, crosstalk / mud.
- analoque compression and EQ on the masterbuss, get the density back into low/mids. ITB those area's always sound, hollow, they measure the same, same EQ settings, same compression settings, call me anal, but There is no plug that does what a pair of distressors does on drums, the API Collection is still far away from a 2500 + 5500 combo. I hear it, you'll hear it.

So for me OTB is not about doing what can be ITB, but about ammending where you make significant gains.
You're right saying one can make quality productions fully ITB (i mean one can make quality productions with REASON) the thing is that when you bounce these reason tracks and mix them with a good chain they sound just so much better. So i guess it depends on what your after. Will the avg ASOT /TATW podcast listeners notice? probably not, is that relevant as a purchase decission? probalby not. It's about fulfilment en potential. Will you hear a totally different vibe as in a well mastered project Ohhhhh YES! Will you hear a totally different vibe when people listen on a quality hifi set at home? yes for sure. Again not a matter of "better" or "worse" just a different vibe that you can't get without a decent chain. If you want/need it is up to u.


Posted by Avatar One on Jan-31-2011 10:12:

Wasn't BT's 2003 album 'Emotional Technology' produced entirely with soft synths?


Posted by Evolve140 on Jan-31-2011 10:15:

I don't know why these threads keep popping up, but Maor Levi used a bunch of free plugins to make great tunes later played by everyone, at 16, with FL studio.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-31-2011 10:22:

eric prydz have been doing it for years.


Posted by Storyteller on Jan-31-2011 10:33:

nevur mind what I put in here before, I was just being an ass...

now...

I'd say there is no reason to work OTB. ITB is the shit because:
- It's cheaper
- Takes less space
- Just about anything in software is of equal quality or better
- More efficient (easier to automate, undo etc).

Unless you're looking for something very very specific (hands on control) that isn't available for your pc there is really no reason to go OTB. Or just for the sake of wanting to go OTB of course.

I've had some OTB gear and ended up selling most of it thus far. I've still got some stuff but don't really do much with it. My Virus C is more so used as a plain (but good) midi-keyboard.

I'm still debating getting a big ass touchscreen. Would be a nice gimmick to move all the faders on-screen without a hassle.


Posted by Raphie on Jan-31-2011 11:14:

It's all about looking for specifics, they are there, it's just the question of how bad you want "that" sound. and if your willing to seperate with money for it.

Again 70% of the tracks on ASOT / TATW are probably done 100% ITB, even "mastered" by the "label" or artist themselves.

It all sound the same like a Nexus/Sylenth demo. Yes your arps can be different, ofcourse you will find some new patches and fx, but it all has that same harsch / hollow ITB grain over it.

Some people just don't like that flavour. others just don't know better, ignorance is bliss for them. And that's not a problem, if you can't hear the difference in density between a patch on a Virus and a best effort mimic on a VSTi's then just don't bother.

it's like holding a balloon with air and one with water
the one filled with air, looks the same, same volume but just lacks the weight. It's a different vibe, different flavour.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Jan-31-2011 11:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
ASOT / TATW ... it all has that same harsch / hollow ITB grain over it.

you cant seriously think this is reference for how software can sound right? its the producers and the genre man, not the gear. if youre producing trance today you have already lost (well in most case, theres still some talents out there).


Posted by Raphie on Jan-31-2011 11:22:

Agreed, but being played there is what most people here admire right?


Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.