TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- How to make a "raw" sound?


Posted by trancedanne on Mar-02-2011 16:42:

How to make a "raw" sound?

How can i make a track sound "rawer" and less clear in a good way? Im really bad at describing what i mean with raw sound but this was common in older trance and especially GOA music. I know it much depends on the sounds you choose but mixing wise i wanna know how to achieve that type of "old" sound which simply doesn't exist today.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Mar-02-2011 16:51:

Don't use as many hi hats and other high end percussion. Fewer effects, and fewer tracks in general. Also tape saturation.


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-02-2011 16:54:

Not sure I comprehend what sound that you're looking for, but I think that maybe you want some mild harmonic distortion? Have you tried a tape saturation effect?


Posted by Looney4Clooney on Mar-02-2011 16:55:

little to no reverb and delay. As MJB mentioned, the more raw and upfront a sound is, the more space it takes therefore less sounds. Use a cabinet sim . distortion or saturator send on elements you want to thicken. Lowering the bit and sample rate works well on drums.


Posted by sonicboom on Mar-02-2011 17:08:

distortion


Posted by KilldaDJ on Mar-02-2011 17:29:

record it to tape and record it back. repeat ONE BILLION TIMES


Posted by Rodri Santos on Mar-02-2011 18:35:

pitching down the sounds make them sound a bit raw, vocoder & grain effects sometimes work well too


Posted by DJ Robby Rox on Mar-02-2011 20:16:

I suggest getting into FM sounds like in FM8. The fx and fm programming can get a lot of those dense dirty, but still relatively sharp and clear sounds. It really depends how you go about it.

But FM8 is great for that. I like a lot of "raw" sounds myself. More in the way that they resonate loud at low volumes and bring essential depth to a track.


Posted by Andy28 on Mar-02-2011 20:57:

yeah I think eq your sound then add distortion overdrive etc then eq again to take off unwanted added freqs is what I think your after. Also a cabinet sim like m4b suggested can really give you a nice crunch in your sounds


Posted by Raphie on Mar-02-2011 21:08:

distortion works, together with gating your drumbus it works even better. RAW <> smooth (smooth is verbtails, tape saturation, tube emulation) try to stay away from these type of effects if you want a "raw" upfront sound


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-02-2011 21:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Raphie
RAW <> smooth (smooth is verbtails, tape saturation, tube emulation) try to stay away from these type of effects if you want a "raw" upfront sound


That's sorta what I was getting at in my post - I don't understand if he actually wants raw/in-your-face or "less clear in a good way", which, to me, implies smeared (e.g., ala saturation).


Posted by meriter on Mar-04-2011 07:21:

hardware compression -> analog tape


Posted by derail on Mar-05-2011 00:53:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
That's sorta what I was getting at in my post - I don't understand if he actually wants raw/in-your-face or "less clear in a good way", which, to me, implies smeared (e.g., ala saturation).


That's also how I read it - the "raw sound" common in older trance isn't the "raw/dry/in your face sound" heard today.

Your best bet to get those sounds would be to grab some of the hardware synths used on those tracks.

For the overall sound - in general I'd say do less EQ cutting so the instruments aren't as separated from each other. In general, use more reverb. Find drum samples which sound more like those used at that time. Every sound affects every other sound, so having modern sounding drums will mean the "raw sound" won't sound right in context.

As other people have said, tape saturation could work well. I don't know if distortion/overdrive will help (of course, it totally depends on what type of distortion/overdrive). In general though, distorting things isn't the way to get old style "raw but still quite clean" sounds.


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Mar-06-2011 12:26:

Surely it's all about the samples you use more than anything?

Get some old school kicks, hats, etc.


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-06-2011 17:30:

Why do people start threads like these, then just disappear.


Posted by meriter on Mar-06-2011 17:34:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
Why do people start threads like these, then just disappear.


They're probably busy working on shit and not fucking off on the internet


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-06-2011 17:39:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
They're probably busy working on shit and not fucking off on the internet


Doubtful. If he was that busy, he wouldn't have posted such a basic/ambiguous question in the first place.


Posted by PlasticSoul on Mar-06-2011 17:45:

I think these free plugins can help this thread:

Camel Crusher http://www.camelaudio.com/camelcrusher.php
FerricTDS http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com...i-the-kvr-dc09/


Posted by 112268 on Mar-06-2011 17:53:

quote:
Originally posted by cryophonik
Why do people start threads like these, then just disappear.

they found google.


Posted by meriter on Mar-06-2011 17:55:

quote:
Originally posted by 112268
they found google redtube.


ftfy


Posted by meriter on Mar-06-2011 18:00:

WHAT I AM IMPLYING IS THAT THEY ARE BUSY MASTURBATING


Posted by cryophonik on Mar-06-2011 18:09:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
WHAT I AM IMPLYING IS THAT THEY ARE BUSY MASTURBATING


That gives "raw" and "in your face" a whole different meaning.


Posted by 112268 on Mar-06-2011 18:12:

what makes a track hardcore? samples of pornstars moaning.


Posted by Imu on Mar-07-2011 03:43:

very little distortion. but i would couple it with a tiny bit of flanger (maybe 5% mix with 15% feedback)

also if I'm interpreting your question right, a square wave should do the trick. i disagree with the statement about using less hi-hats. just don't make them as pronounced and keep your open hats simple and your snare/clap relatively thin. perhaps try to compress fewer things. definitely don't compress (or compress sparingly) your lead synth - that's a very recent thing, probably a result of every producer under the sun going to benno for engineering help.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.