Avid Pro Tools 9 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Avid Pro Tools 9

Posted by Von Pistol on Apr-08-2011 18:05:

Avid Pro Tools 9

hey has anyone used this software?

is it any good?

Pros/cons?

VP

Posted by cryophonik on Apr-08-2011 18:14:

Posted by DJ RANN on Apr-08-2011 18:20:

Re: Avid Pro Tools 9

quote:
Originally posted by Von Pistol
hey has anyone used this software?

is it any good?

Pros/cons?

VP

Dude, you have got to start using the search function. I mean christ even if you'd gone to the second or third page of this forum you'd have found the thread discussing it.

Posted by J.L. on Apr-09-2011 07:13:

I think Pro Tools is still quite new so no one uses it.

Posted by Zak McKracken on Apr-09-2011 08:40:

quote:
Originally posted by J.L.
I think Pro Tools is still quite new so no one uses it.

i wouldnt consider anything on version 9 as new.

Posted by kitphillips on Apr-11-2011 11:12:

quote:
Originally posted by J.L.
I think Pro Tools is still quite new so no one uses it.

What

You sure are a talented producer with little idea about technical things Goes to show what I've always said; he who talks about gear all the time is just hiding his lack of talent.

Posted by J.L. on Apr-11-2011 15:39:

I was just taking the piss... lol

I've used it before and it was good for multitrack recording, but otherwise I didn't like the work flow. I'd assume most people would know what ProTools is.

Posted by Zak McKracken on Apr-11-2011 15:43:

its the douchebag daw

Posted by ReclusNdangrmnt on Apr-11-2011 21:35:

There's not much that's truly new with 9, Avid is just upping the ante for the standard issue version, including things that you previously had to pay extra for, and bringing it into closer competition with other DAWs in terms of music production (ADR, more voices, etc).

Posted by Von Pistol on Apr-12-2011 00:18:

Ya i did look through all the last pages and i must have missed it RANN. Sorry to let ya down once again ha

So nothing special about it then. Thanks

Posted by ReclusNdangrmnt on Apr-12-2011 03:48:

Depends on what you're looking for in a DAW. It seems very competitive with the standard choices, and if you have a history in editing it's an easy switch (if you're not already familiar with it).

It was an easy choice starting out because that's what I was learning, and I was given an Mbox.

Posted by kitphillips on Apr-12-2011 07:07:

^^ Its underfeatured and not economically competetive at all. Do not recommend.

quote:
Originally posted by J.L.
I was just taking the piss... lol

I've used it before and it was good for multitrack recording, but otherwise I didn't like the work flow. I'd assume most people would know what ProTools is.

Ditto.

PS
This is tranceaddict, assume that no one knows anything until evidence is given otherwise.

Posted by ReclusNdangrmnt on Apr-12-2011 07:27:

I wasn't thinking in terms of economics (valid point), but I am curious to see where you think it's under-featured, and what you're comparing it to.