TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- What percentage of your production time is focused on trance?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Apr-23-2011 14:29:

What percentage of your production time is focused on trance?

Let's test the popular perception of this forum as a den of supersaw fanatics.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Apr-23-2011 14:36:

i had to vote 20-40 as i consider progtrance and psytrance as subgenres of REAL trance. and i do those. but basically im too underground to be labeled.


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-23-2011 14:49:

I chose less than 20%, because I don't do trance, but I definitely incorporate stylistic elements of it.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Apr-23-2011 14:51:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
stylistic elements

supersaw yes?


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-23-2011 14:58:

quote:
Originally posted by clay
supersaw yes?


As a back-ground synth, I've chosen to use a supersaw like sound, a couple of times.

Deep Eddie Zilker - Superstition by EddieZilker

The last time is right where I just put a timed comment on Superstition. It's playing a counter-melody.


Posted by Subtle on Apr-23-2011 15:32:

voted 60-80%

Trance is where its at..


Posted by Nicolas Oliver on Apr-23-2011 16:22:

Definitely 0%


Posted by -FSP- on Apr-23-2011 18:06:

I am a trancesexual at heart, since that's how I got introduced to the club world. That said, I don't listen to trance anymore, nor do I make it. I make deep house, techno, and electronica.


Posted by DJ RANN on Apr-23-2011 18:30:

I mainly produce pro but often a few trance elements creep in there so I voted 20-40% (even though I do not produce trance itself at all).


Posted by pwnage1 on Apr-23-2011 18:46:

I just make Electronic music more in vain with Tangerine dream, telefon tel aviv, and flying lotus. It's hard to put it in a genre really, but i borrow elements from everything, and sometimes i'll throw down a trance track, though usually with real drums, and a lot of things that aren't considered trancey.


Posted by MSZ on Apr-23-2011 21:54:

guess i wasnt sure about the question, voted for 40-60. the genre itself? barely at all ever. trance elements? almost always, my progressive/progressivehouse and breaks tracks are very droney, atmospheric and have melodic elements a la trance.

see here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSazL1yLxFA


Posted by DJ RANN on Apr-23-2011 22:22:

quote:
Originally posted by MSZ
guess i wasnt sure about the question, voted for 40-60. the genre itself? barely at all ever. trance elements? almost always, my progressive/progressivehouse and breaks tracks are very droney, atmospheric and have melodic elements a la trance.

see here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSazL1yLxFA


Oh fuck you, Your tracks are starting to sound like jaytech and Mr Reece

Great job man, this is exactly the sort of stuff I play out


Posted by Richard Butler on Apr-23-2011 23:01:

20% max for me, although I've just done this track with my partner in crime and fo rme it's the best thing I've ever done, and it's damned trancey, mmm;


DearHeart2 by Dirtbox Divas


Posted by MSZ on Apr-23-2011 23:03:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
Oh fuck you, Your tracks are starting to sound like jaytech and Mr Reece

Great job man, this is exactly the sort of stuff I play out


thanks dude ghost producer status incoming.


Posted by DJ Robby Rox on Apr-24-2011 00:02:

100%... I mean this is tranceaddict right? Not houseaddict or electroaddict? =]

I find most other genres too minimal for my tastes. And I also find trance the most challenging to make overall. Thats why I've convinced myself if I ever learn how to make good trance it should be easier branching out to other styles rather than going from more minimal styles to trance.

Well actually I don't really care about that, I just like trance the most. And no I don't think its dead at all.


Posted by Seandroid on Apr-24-2011 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
100%... I mean this is tranceaddict right? Not houseaddict or electroaddict? =]

I find most other genres too minimal for my tastes. And I also find trance the most challenging to make overall. Thats why I've convinced myself if I ever learn how to make good trance it should be easier branching out to other styles rather than going from more minimal styles to trance.

Well actually I don't really care about that, I just like trance the most. And no I don't think its dead at all.


Trance... hardest to make?

Try making some complextro and say that again. And how by any stretch of the imagination is electro too minimal?

Regardless I voted 0% but I guess I should have maybe voted 20% because I sometimes have trancier elements in my breakdowns like the "epic" chords in Burst and the proggy stuff in Seventeen and Riot.


Posted by Nomen Nescio on Apr-24-2011 11:41:

For me 100 % as well. I only produce trance, a) because I still love the musical genre and b) even when I try to make something a lot more minimal or housey I find myself adding melodic elements in it again and before I know it, it just sounds trancy again haha.

Very well executed trance still does it for me. I wish a lot of the classic anthems had been produced these days with the current technology, choice of great sounds and production techniques.


Posted by Beatflux on Apr-24-2011 13:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Seandroid
Trance... hardest to make?

Try making some complextro and say that again. And how by any stretch of the imagination is electro too minimal?

Regardless I voted 0% but I guess I should have maybe voted 20% because I sometimes have trancier elements in my breakdowns like the "epic" chords in Burst and the proggy stuff in Seventeen and Riot.


I do not know what is the hard genre to produce.

If you think trance is easy, try picking out any pluck you want and writing a 8+ bar melody.


Posted by EddieZilker on Apr-24-2011 15:21:

Gentlemen, please. This isn't a measuring contest and the idea that one genre is more difficult than another isn't even germane to the discussion, let alone provable. Technical complexity doesn't make a song good and technical ability varies across the board, regardless of which producer produces in whatever genre.


Posted by Beatflux on Apr-24-2011 15:32:

quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Gentlemen, please. This isn't a measuring contest and the idea that one genre is more difficult than another isn't even germane to the discussion, let alone provable. Technical complexity doesn't make a song good and technical ability varies across the board, regardless of which producer produces in whatever genre.


Think of the conversation as diverting into a genre appreciate thread.

Every genre is special. And different. Special and different.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Apr-24-2011 16:01:

like retards. unique.


Posted by itsamemario on Apr-24-2011 18:54:

0%. I don't make trance. Although I use elements similar to the trance from the earlier parts of the 90s.


Posted by Evolve140 on Apr-24-2011 21:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
I do not know what is the hard genre to produce.

If you think trance is easy, try picking out any pluck you want and writing a 8+ bar melody.


No kidding...


Posted by Lucidity on Apr-24-2011 22:05:

I chose 80-100%, mostly I produce trance but, if its not trance, it for sure has elements of trance in it. TraNce 4 LiFe!


Posted by zodiac9 on Apr-25-2011 02:23:

I said 40-60%, because I still produce quite a bit of Progressive Trance. The label seems to think I produce Trance as well, seeing that my last 4 tracks weren't the style they were looking for. My mind is so infused with Trance, it's hard to avoid it influencing my productions. That's not always a bad thing, Trance elements work in House tunes and such. I'm trying to get away from Trance, because the labels just don't seem to want it anymore. I understand that, because I don't listen to much Trance anymore either.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.