TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Chuck Norris is a columnist and impossible to kill.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Chuck Norris is a columnist and impossible to kill.

http://townhall.com/columnists/chuc...ours/page/full/

oh brother

Guns don't kill people. People kill guns.

quote:

Originally posted by Alex Guns don't kill people. Bullets do.

Fix'd

There's a flaw in your logic sir!

It IS possible to beat someone to death with a gun.

Like Magnum PI !!!!!!!!

Guns don't kill people.

Thanks alt.

He is sort of right though. Guns dont kill people, bullets do. So let people to keep their guns, but outlaw all bullets. problem solved.

quote:

Originally posted by Moongoose He is sort of right though. Guns dont kill people, bullets do. So let people to keep their guns, but outlaw all bullets. problem solved.

The thing is , right-wing twats like him think gun regulation is some kind of affront, without realizing that at the time the constitution was written, people of all kinds had to be ready to pull out their musket and defend against invaders. I come from one of the most hunter-friendly states in the country, but I think it's asinine to think the 2nd amendment is nearly as relevant today.



I love the last line:

quote:

God, guns and guts made America. Let's keep all three.

quote:

Originally posted by PvDoBseSSioN http://i564.photobucket.com/albums/...Kill_People.jpg

quote:

Originally posted by D-res The thing is , right-wing twats like him think gun regulation is some kind of affront, without realizing that at the time the constitution was written, people of all kinds had to be ready to pull out their musket and defend against invaders. I come from one of the most hunter-friendly states in the country, but I think it's asinine to think the 2nd amendment is nearly as relevant today.

The 2nd amendment was for the purpose of the citizens to defend themselves against our own government should the need arise. I highly doubt citizens being armed will have any effect today should that case arise. Still, you can't go changing the constitution.

quote:

Originally posted by WittyHandle The 2nd amendment was for the purpose of the citizens to defend themselves against our own government should the need arise. I highly doubt citizens being armed will have any effect today should that case arise. Still, you can't go changing the constitution.

Indeed. I don't care how many guns a redneck claims to have in his armory. There's little any well-armed citizen can do against military technology. And I agree, it should remain unchanged. But it's pretty unambiguous given the time in which it was written. Why there's so much debate over its interpretation baffles me.

You presume that any foreseeable scenario involves the US Government launching everything it has against its citizens. This always seems to be the presumption. I think the only reason it's brought up is because it sounds ludicrous, and everybody knows that people who like guns are just ludicrous!

quote:

Originally posted by WittyHandle The 2nd amendment was for the purpose of the citizens to defend themselves against our own government should the need arise. I highly doubt citizens being armed will have any effect today should that case arise. Still, you can't go changing the constitution.

Chuck's argument - pffft; I called it an argument, LOL!! - is based on the tried and true NRA standard Camel's Nose Logical Fallacy that stipulates any sane measure for gun control should be immediately reframed as a strong-armed method to erode the rights of God-fearing, gun-loving idiots who finance Wayne LaPierre's extravagant life-style. You can't even be certain Obama's actually taken the measures that Chuck, in his tireless crusade against fucking logic, argues that he's taking.

quote:

Originally posted by D-res

As a fellow Milwaukeean myself, I've actually never done any kind of hunting but can't people in Wisconsin hunt with assault weapons? Did deer start packin' nines?

Also, did Milwaukee pass that concealed handgun law?

quote:

Originally posted by Syntonic As a fellow Milwaukeean myself, I've actually never done any kind of hunting but can't people in Wisconsin hunt with assault weapons? Did deer start packin' nines? Also, did Milwaukee pass that concealed handgun law?

Nice! I thought I knew all the Milwaukee TAs. I don't know how facetious your first questions were, but I think as long as the guns are semi-automatic, the law is pretty lax.


For example, a friend of mine:





To be fair, I know fuck-all about guns.

As far as concealed carry, the Milwaukee police chief spoke out against the measure, but alas, it passed state-wide.

quote:

Originally posted by D-res

READY FOR A DAY AT THE OFFICE. NORWAY STYLE.

quote:

Originally posted by D-res Nice! I thought I knew all the Milwaukee TAs. I don't know how facetious your first questions were, but I think as long as the guns are semi-automatic, the law is pretty lax. For example, a friend of mine: To be fair, I know fuck-all about guns. As far as concealed carry, the Milwaukee police chief spoke out against the measure, but alas, it passed state-wide.

that's a 22lr clone of a hk mp5sd,
basicly a fancy-looking sparrow gun.

quote:

Originally posted by VAR that's a 22lr clone of a hk mp5sd, basicly a fancy-looking sparrow gun.

Nice I get to make fun of him even more.

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker Chuck's argument - pffft; I called it an argument, LOL!! - is based on the tried and true NRA standard Camel's Nose Logical Fallacy that stipulates any sane measure for gun control should be immediately reframed as a strong-armed method to erode the rights of God-fearing, gun-loving idiots who finance Wayne LaPierre's extravagant life-style. You can't even be certain Obama's actually taken the measures that Chuck, in his tireless crusade against fucking logic, argues that he's taking.

I don't know shit about guns. I was just psyched I could throw out the one thing I did know and sound cool. For a sec.

Of course everybody should have a right to own a gun, if you in fact are mentally sound and not likely to go and kill someone with that gun.

The 2nd amendment says nothing against the government keeping tabs on who has a gun, and what guns they have. It'd be insane if it did. Regulation doesn't mean they will take YOUR gun away, it means they take them away from people who has, or are in all likelihood going to use them in a criminal act.

And fucking blaming Obama for (yet) a failed ATF operation?
I heard we was the guy who gave them the intel on Waco.

People should be allowed to own a gun for hunting after an extensive background check, test, etc. Nobody should be allowed to own a handgun, or if they are they should not be allowed to leave their house with it.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.