TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Redistributing core load in Logic
Redistributing core load in Logic
Been hitting a brick wall with this current project, was wondering if anyone knew a way around this. I found this article http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161.
I think what the sadistic author is trying to say in human language is that if you route the effects of a software instrument to a separate bus it'll distribute the workload across two cores instead of one. 1 channel strip, one core. That makes sense.
The problem I'm running into here is that there is one mastering plugin that's overloading one core, thing is it's choosing to process on a core that already has a fair amount of activity on it, so it's crapping out instead of defaulting to a core that's barely doing anything. I can look at the CPU meter and see that core 2 for instance barely has any activity, but core 4 is at about 50% capacity. Instead of choosing the core with the least activity, it chooses the core with the most activity and then overloads as a result. Any way to fix this?
The project I'm working on has several tracks of 96/24 audio, and I think 5 separate instances of Battery. But I have all of the Battery tracks frozen along with any audio tracks that are using processor intensive plugins. It's stripped down to the bare minimum with buffer setting at max.
Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter Been hitting a brick wall with this current project, was wondering if anyone knew a way around this. I found this article http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161. I think what the sadistic author is trying to say in human language is that if you route the effects of a software instrument to a separate bus it'll distribute the workload across two cores instead of one. 1 channel strip, one core. That makes sense. The problem I'm running into here is that there is one mastering plugin that's overloading one core, thing is it's choosing to process on a core that already has a fair amount of activity on it, so it's crapping out instead of defaulting to a core that's barely doing anything. I can look at the CPU meter and see that core 2 for instance barely has any activity, but core 4 is at about 50% capacity. Instead of choosing the core with the least activity, it chooses the core with the most activity and then overloads as a result. Any way to fix this? The project I'm working on has several tracks of 96/24 audio, and I think 5 separate instances of Battery. But I have all of the Battery tracks frozen along with any audio tracks that are using processor intensive plugins. It's stripped down to the bare minimum with buffer setting at max. |
Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
Thanks RANN I was hoping one of you guys would help me out with this, though I guess it's not really even that big of a problem. I don't even intend to master this myself, but I like being able to mix with the plugin on to get a better idea of how it'll end up sounding.
1, What mac do you have and what version of OSX?
april 2010 mbp 2.4 ghz i5, 8 gigs of ram and a SSD. most recent version of snow leopard
2, Are you in 32bit or 64bit mode?
pretty sure it's 64 bit (you mean is the OS 64 or 32 bit?)
3, What mastering plugin are you talking about?
waves L3-16
4, Why 5 instances of battery?
Poor decision I know, but I've freezed all the instruments tracks so I don't think it should be an issue.
5, What is your normal routing method - are you all individual tracks or are there already auxes/groups?
I have a bus set up for each of the more demanding plugins, but most of the tracks don't need much else besides EQ'ing so they are just routed to the master bus. I've got one instance of the space designer as a bus and am setting up sends for whatever tracks need some verb. I have a bus compressor set up too and am routing most of the percussion tracks to that. I've never worked with 'groups' before in logic.
6, Is your project 24/96 or did you just import these tracks in to the working project standard?
Recorded in 24/96.
7, And do they really need to be 24/96? (are they just synth lines or real orch/vox recorded in pro studios?
:/
Re: Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter Thanks RANN I was hoping one of you guys would help me out with this, though I guess it's not really even that big of a problem. I don't even intend to master this myself, but I like being able to mix with the plugin on to get a better idea of how it'll end up sounding. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 1, april 2010 mbp 2.4 ghz i5, 8 gigs of ram and a SSD. most recent version of snow leopard |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 2,pretty sure it's 64 bit (you mean is the OS 64 or 32 bit?) |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 3,waves L3-16 |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 4,Poor decision I know, but I've freezed all the instruments tracks so I don't think it should be an issue. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 5,I have a bus set up for each of the more demanding plugins, but most of the tracks don't need much else besides EQ'ing so they are just routed to the master bus. I've got one instance of the space designer as a bus and am setting up sends for whatever tracks need some verb. I have a bus compressor set up too and am routing most of the percussion tracks to that. I've never worked with 'groups' before in logic. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter 6, Recorded in 24/96. |
That was a great read for me, cheers fellas
Re: Re: Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN but if it's your ex girlfriend doing her aguilera impression on an SM58 in to your built in mic pre, do yourself a favor and save the disk space. |
| quote: |
| Don't worry about groups then for the time being. When you say "for the more demanding plugins, that makes me worry that you have a bunch of other "less demanding" plugs as inserts for other channels. Really, inserts on individual channels should be sparse, as most FX can be used with Aux sends which is a far more efficient way of working. I think some of your problems are actually down to bad resource usage and workflow inefficianecy but more on that later. So going back to efficiency: you raised some red flags with the 5 instances of battery and talking about "more demanding plugs on sends". In most projects, I normally see about 80% of the FX can be dealt with sends which is the far more efficient way of working, with then just a few inserts for specific things on other channels as needed (like compression or a distortion plug etc). |
| quote: |
| No, OSX is 64 bit, I mean whether you're utilizing the 64bit mode of logic (and the 64bit kernal). As standard it's usually 32bit but I've seen it catch someone out before, but having said that it's 99% not the case as you would not be able to use waves plugs without having installed the specific 64bit update, and therefore you'd know if you were using the 64bit logic mode. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter Hah! Wow. It's actually embarrassing how accurate that is. Yes it's an ex girlfriend, yes it's an SM58, and yes it's through the mic pre. If you had said regina spektor instead of aguilera I'd be asking for a palm reading. Anyway... I do agree battery is buggy as shit. I'm making it a point to use the NI stuff less and less. This is an older project though. I bet you anything if I bounced the audio, or even just reloaded the samples into an exs24 instrument things would even out. That's what I'll try next. I do think there is some merit in testing your mix with the mastering stuff on, but I wouldn't trust it completely. Just using it as a reference and it does sometimes reveal flaws in the mix. Yeah I'm pretty much working this way now... didn't in the past but I'm learning. Now I have it set up with one maybe two delay busses, 1 reverb, drum bus ect. I actually don't use many inserts I try to use the synths onboard effects when possible. Most of the tracks just have logic's eq and maybe a C1 here and there, or logic's chorus effect which honestly the processor barely notices. The 5 instances of Battery I knew was stupid as I was doing it, pretty sure I had been drinking. First I've heard of this, I might have installed the update and don't remember. I'll read up on it. Ugh the learning curve for this stuff is just insane. There's just so much shit you don't even know you don't know. I'm trying to talk one of my musician friends out of self-producing just cause he's like "I want to be able to achieve a pro quality sound on my own, what kind of audio interface should I get?" Groan. Thank you for the invaluable help. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ RANN I do love battery though so know I've got a working version (3.05 I think) it's all ok, but I really should get more in ot EXS24 - it really can do everything and is way less of a cpu hog than battery. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Redistributing core load in Logic
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter It also integrates really well with logic. Double click the sample and it opens up in the waveform editor. Pretty much sold on it. The only thing is that it prompts you to save a new instrument set with everything. Even if you're just using it as a one shot thing you never plan on using again, still have to save it externally, it doesn't just save within the project. Stupid imo. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.