TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- FLS is the best DAW in the world!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
FLS is the best DAW in the world!
http://www.musicradar.com/tuition/t...today-238905/15
There you have it. This should put an end to all the "can I make pro songs in FLS threads?" once and for all.
The funny part is that Reaper is #4, yet a link on the very same page says that it's the best DAW in the world today.
http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech...ld-today-489062
Now, I think I'm finally beginning to understand why so many newbs are confused and think that there actually is such a thing as a "best" DAW.
yeah i get what your are saying but people will always look for that edge in there music making skills.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by stewart.m ...people will always look for that edge in there music making skills. |
really doubt it is the most popular. Can you even record with fruity loops ?
Yeah, MIDI and audio.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Looney4Clooney really doubt it is the most popular. |
*sigh*
I think trying to quantify which DAW is the most "popular" and then making any sort of objective claim based on that is a tad silly.
heck i bet image line paid em for top spot its all about marketing i guess.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik True, but claiming that the most popular DAW is synonymous with "the best" is pretty misleading and doesn't necessarily give anyone an edge in making music. They're all good DAWs - there's no reason for musicradar to keep perpetuating this idea of a "best" DAW. |
There is no "best" DAW. Different strokes for different folks. Stop derailing the thread.
FLS is missing a few things to make it a professional DAW. Maybe i'm wrong. Can it send a wordclock ? IS it still 32 bit ? Maybe sufficient for EDM producers but I doubt you will find anyone making any other kind of music with it.
DAWs are like a cloned hot chick and the only differences between the clones are the color of the hair and eyes. Everybody gonna say that his is the best. Is just a matter of taste :-)
The eternal debate. DAW's mean shit. I work with Logic, but can't even get my tracks to sound as 'spacey' as for example Kandi, who still works with Reason.
there are certain requirements in certain fields that make certain DAWs unusable, FLS and reason being one of them. If we are strictly talking EDM , then ya , it really doesn't matter.
Yes, and that is why people from the likes of Estiva, Maor Levi and a shitload of other people use FL. Yes, i also dislike FL, but in the end, it doesn't matter. It's about skills, son.
unless you have to sync multiple devices in different rooms, have audio at different sampling rates and a host of other things professionals use daily , then sure FL is fine. Please don't call me son.
Chill out. It's just an expression. And yes, FL doesn't have the capabilties that Logic has. But to each his own. Everything else is not important. 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Looney4Clooney Maybe sufficient for EDM producers but I doubt you will find anyone making any other kind of music with it. |
Oops - didn't mean to start another DAW war. 
A) image line either paid for that poll or leveraged their marketing/gifts/reader prizes.
B) Fruityloops looks like a toy, that's why it's popular with noobs. It isn't all scary with confounding menus and such.
C) It only just got multi processor support and from what I hear, it really doesn't work very well at all.
D)Don't be fooled that it's 64bit - from what i understand they added "64bit support" - meaning it can handle 64bit plugins, but the host itself is still 32bit. Why does that suck? No matter how much RAM you put in your little dell, FL will only ever address and make use of a max of 3gb (2 gb actually unless you do the FL fox to address more).
E) It probably is the most used DAW, as it's what the most noobs torrent download install to make "Beatz".
I'm not having a crack at FL - there are producers that make way better music than me on Logic - just making the statement that in terms of programming, innovation, features and functions it has (and still does) consistantly lag behind the other major "professional" platforms (Cubase/Logic/Sonar/PTHD/Live).
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Looney4Clooney FLS is missing a few things to make it a professional DAW. Maybe i'm wrong. Can it send a wordclock ? IS it still 32 bit ? Maybe sufficient for EDM producers but I doubt you will find anyone making any other kind of music with it. |
souljaboy's debut , the one reportdely made in fruity loops , mixed by Jason "jew name i cna't remember"
afrojack ? really ?
look i never said you couldn't make music on it, it just isn't really a tool you will ever find in a professional environment for various reasons I don't really want to get into.
Live offers a much more open set of tools for EDM and I honestly don't understand why anyone would use FLS. Well I suppose I do, people that make 10 layer EDM. sure FLS can handle that.
You know waves offer 24 hour support but I wonder how long the tech will laugh under his breath when you say you are running FLS. Not that anyone running that has ever paid for anything.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Looney4Clooney You know waves offer 24 hour support but I wonder how long the tech will laugh under his breath when you say you are running FLS. Not that anyone running that has ever paid for anything. |
hi i am new producer, i am just learning fl studio!
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.