TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Ableton vs Cubase vs Logic (in 2011)
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Ableton vs Cubase vs Logic (in 2011)
Peeps, need some advise. I like Ableton but it's been acting up lately and crashing randomly. I am thinking of possibly jumping ship back to Cubase but ain't been there since v1.6. Logic is attractive but I'm hearing it has it's share of issues.
ableton midi editing pisses me off and working with a trackball zoom is holly fucking shit level of frustrating... Drawing automation sucks ass too...
I'm running MBP i7 2.4Ghz, btw
Thoughts?
Reaper! 
www.reaper.fm
Logic pro 9 on my imac is rock fucking solid and frankly a joy to use.
Cubase does all the same things but I love the interface of logic and it all makes sense to me.
The only gripe I have is the slight lack of pre-defined key commands (like you find standardised in cubase) but they leave iot up to you to define your own and if you look on the web, you'll find tons already made for logic from the PTHD commands to the cubase ones etc.
It's not a long term problem but for someone just trying to get in to it (and from the sounds of it you would be) it can just take a little bit of setting up.
One thing I really love about logic is that, aside from PT, it is increibly close to routing in a real studio environment - it all makes such logical sense.
I love Cubase, and I despise Live (for it's shit MIDI and unintuitive mixing layout, to me it's a sketchpad).
I think Logic is slightly ahead of Cubase in most areas, most notably the included plugins (if that matters), the way it all hooks up and it's less cluttered workflow. If I had a Mac it's the only DAW i'd consider learning properly alongside Cubase.
I run a pirated version of 8.2.1 on XP SP3 and it might crash once every 3 months. You're doing something wrong.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Beatflux pirated version |
| quote: |
| You're doing something wrong. |
I couldn't imagine trying to produce in ableton.. people actually do that? 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by meriter I couldn't imagine trying to produce in ableton.. people actually do that? |
oi don't get why people use anything but ableton for EDM. It is really vertical music. Automation in logic is rather poor in comparison and that also goes for mid. And yes I know how to use the environment. I use logic because the music I make is more thru composed so it makes sense to use a DAW that is more linear.
I find Logic rather mediocre. It isn't really spectacular at anything. Reaper would really just have to add a few things and be so much better. Logic just hasn't improved in years. It works but it is hardly innovative.
I doubt making the switch to lion and I have a feeling logic X will be absolute garbage. IN that case, back to pc and cubase.
It depends how you like to work. I prefer the linear way of working. Not a fan of the jamming with clips. The clips in ableton will help if you would be struggling to make the arrangement. I feel logic is the better deal with the best plugins available for the price. I also prefer the routing and environment possibilities with logic.
As for Logic X? I don't trust that at all. I don't like the way operating systems are becoming more like iPads/iPhones
knowing logic and live quite well... I second L4C's opinion here. Logic is rather poor because they never have taken the time to re-design those arpeggio, chord and other elements living in the ruins of the environment. In fact the whole environment should be easier to use now, and it's the perfect opposite. So you're constantly fighting against the limitations of logic, but in a way it also serves you as you dig deeper.
What's missing in logic anno 2011: destructive audio-editing with plugins (an old request from 2002 but I gave up), better environment tools, better keyboard "gestures": arp, chord, pitch, velocity other than the environment blocks. And now also lacking the pitch on audio tracks alongside with the flex time engine.
I use Logic though, been using it since 1998 and after a pause in 2007 I got back to it a year later.
I went for ableton live in 2005 which I still use for quick productions, remixes and shows of all kinds, but felt terrible with its limitations when trying to make music with people who rely on sheet music. Plus the midi editing functions AND the nonsense of anti-ergonomics when it comes to step recording make it poor for midi after all.
Their built-in eq and compressor sound like crap too, let's face it. Also missing in ableton is a spot on audio edition like the one in logic with basic functions such as fade in and out, gain. Ok all of that is there, but it's realtime and taxes cpu for nothing. Plus I like low level editing of files. The ones doing timestretch bit by bit back in the good old years know why :-)
Meanwhile there's one sequencer that might soon overwhelm all the others if they keep making it better at that tempo, that's NI's Maschine. Believe it or not, but fact is that they're pushing it forward by implementing everything I'd expect from logic or live for beat and electronic. What it's missing is ableton like timestrech but oh well... Anyway, it's too early, but it looks like we're having a strong combo by using maschine inside logic, which is what I do today.
L4C might be right, if logic X is garbage, it's time for a change, and the only sequencer that boasts all those features, although I don't like it, is cubase. Who knows, after all...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djshire Now that that's fixed..... |
I've only ever used Cubase 5 and a French chap on Anjuna forum claimed you cannot get a nice sounding kick out of cubase (meaning any sample comes out sounding bad) once rinsed through cubase.
I often find the sound is crunchy and sort of dry and nasty but that could well be my mixing abilty!
Also I imagine the designers never produce, otherwise they would recognise the things we need such as simple mass import of drum samples straight into the drum machine, and then to be able to scroll through each sample as the project plays. There is a way to do this I guess but it's so difficult to work out.
Too much focus on gimmicks for my licking such as the profoundly useless beat designer.
Reverence the built in convolution verb is a love of mine though.
I personally love the workflow and cant imagine anything easier.
LIVE always worried me as I felt it might be inclined to turn out loopy sounding tracks. Seen some great producers swear by it though.
LOGIC beleive it or not I have never seen in my life! I like least clutter in my life and never double up on things and always throw stuff away unless it has a proper place in my life - I hate Christmas crackers for this very reason.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lolo knowing logic and live quite well... I second L4C's opinion here. Logic is rather poor because they never have taken the time to re-design those arpeggio, chord and other elements living in the ruins of the environment. In fact the whole environment should be easier to use now, and it's the perfect opposite. So you're constantly fighting against the limitations of logic, but in a way it also serves you as you dig deeper. What's missing in logic anno 2011: destructive audio-editing with plugins (an old request from 2002 but I gave up), better environment tools, better keyboard "gestures": arp, chord, pitch, velocity other than the environment blocks. And now also lacking the pitch on audio tracks alongside with the flex time engine. I use Logic though, been using it since 1998 and after a pause in 2007 I got back to it a year later. I went for ableton live in 2005 which I still use for quick productions, remixes and shows of all kinds, but felt terrible with its limitations when trying to make music with people who rely on sheet music. Plus the midi editing functions AND the nonsense of anti-ergonomics when it comes to step recording make it poor for midi after all. Their built-in eq and compressor sound like crap too, let's face it. Also missing in ableton is a spot on audio edition like the one in logic with basic functions such as fade in and out, gain. Ok all of that is there, but it's realtime and taxes cpu for nothing. Plus I like low level editing of files. The ones doing timestretch bit by bit back in the good old years know why :-) Meanwhile there's one sequencer that might soon overwhelm all the others if they keep making it better at that tempo, that's NI's Maschine. Believe it or not, but fact is that they're pushing it forward by implementing everything I'd expect from logic or live for beat and electronic. What it's missing is ableton like timestrech but oh well... Anyway, it's too early, but it looks like we're having a strong combo by using maschine inside logic, which is what I do today. L4C might be right, if logic X is garbage, it's time for a change, and the only sequencer that boasts all those features, although I don't like it, is cubase. Who knows, after all... |
Thanks for chiming in, lads. I must say, I found subsequent editions of Cubase (versions after 1.6) cludgy and quite complex, unnecessarily so.
My good friend ran Sonar for a long time and swore by it. One thing I did see, watching him work, was how easy it was to get something going in midi. However, the way it handled vsti was taxing on performance. Also lack of Mac support makes it a nonstarter for me. I'm almost at a point where I either jump ship to logic or eat my crow and crawl back to win XP/Cubase 1.6 - without all the fancy new stuff.
Tyas, Armin, van Doorn, Prydz swear by logic... I'd hate to waste $500 if it don't work out... And I'm not installing virus riddled crack on my Mac. Dilemma...
Any reason you're not considering PT9 or PreSonus Studio One? Both are legitimate contenders, and Studio One V2 is about to be released any day now with a ton of new features. As a former Cubase user, I'd take either one over Cubase, but primarily because I just never liked its workflow, terminology, etc. I'm not a Mac owner and I've never used Logic, but based on the various vids I've seen, it looks nice.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by aNYthing TAnd I'm not installing virus riddled crack on my Mac. Dilemma... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Kysora I'm not really sure what your point is here, pirated versions are usually more prone to bugs and crashes. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by djshire You shouldn't use pirated anything. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cryophonik Any reason you're not considering PT9 or PreSonus Studio One? Both are legitimate contenders, and Studio One V2 is about to be released any day now with a ton of new features. As a former Cubase user, I'd take either one over Cubase, but primarily because I just never liked its workflow, terminology, etc. I'm not a Mac owner and I've never used Logic, but based on the various vids I've seen, it looks nice. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by aNYthing AFAIK, PT does not support VSTi well - only having recently added that functionality. Also, I heard ever since M-Audio (and subsequently whoever bought them out) took over, it got crappier. |
hey RANN
i've alway thought the automation features in Logic and I suppose along with it the midi quite limited. I wish there were better tools for curves, different types of waves and what not like in cubase. It is really rudimentary. I also wish there was like a midi generator similar to like audio but just digital information which you can imagine would be quite handy.
So here is why and where FL Studio comes in.
Seems to be both logic and ableton have been slated for being shit or mediocre at best.
Long live the FL King.
Cubase can eat a dick as far as I am concerned.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7 So here is why and where FL Studio comes in. Seems to be both logic and ableton have been slated for being shit or mediocre at best. Long live the FL King. Cubase can eat a dick as far as I am concerned. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by aNYthing Thanks for chiming in, lads. I must say, I found subsequent editions of Cubase (versions after 1.6) cludgy and quite complex, unnecessarily so. My good friend ran Sonar for a long time and swore by it. One thing I did see, watching him work, was how easy it was to get something going in midi. However, the way it handled vsti was taxing on performance. Also lack of Mac support makes it a nonstarter for me. I'm almost at a point where I either jump ship to logic or eat my crow and crawl back to win XP/Cubase 1.6 - without all the fancy new stuff. Tyas, Armin, van Doorn, Prydz swear by logic... I'd hate to waste $500 if it don't work out... And I'm not installing virus riddled crack on my Mac. Dilemma... |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.