TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- New Trance Track (serious reviews only)


Posted by zidumare on Jan-04-2012 19:21:

New Trance Track (serious reviews only)

New Trance Track (serious reviews only)

http://soundcloud.com/dj-zidumare/zidumare-checkpoint

Thank you

-Zid-


Posted by euphoria on Jan-04-2012 19:37:

Confused

This doesn't sound very trancy.


Posted by zidumare on Jan-04-2012 19:41:

quote:
Originally posted by euphoria
This doesn't sound very trancy.



im sorry i missed all the over extended break downs, stupid piano and vocals in the middle and the weak melody drop near the end.

SORRY I MISSED ALL THAT...

go back to the roots of trance moron, cause what you call trance today is just

pop-dance music.


Posted by Rodri Santos on Jan-04-2012 19:50:

calm down.

Bad Things:

-The overall mixdown sounds flat, like being behind a filter.
-Don't like the bass that much
- I don't find the kick very appropiate nor well produced.
- Do you know how much the track would benefit of snares/claps, hats and percussions?
-Too long without a real progression that keeps it interesting.

Good things:

-The sounds used are fresh in 2012 although some of them sound a bit amateur, i suppose this is the kind of trance a producer from 1998 that hasn't received any influence since then would produce.

-It has a good psy feeling the ambience you've created works.

Basically with a good mixdown, some percussions and a new coherent structure this would be something that people would have in their ipod.


Posted by MrPhilleh on Jan-04-2012 20:26:

quote:
Originally posted by zidumare
im sorry i missed all the over extended break downs, stupid piano and vocals in the middle and the weak melody drop near the end.

SORRY I MISSED ALL THAT...

go back to the roots of trance moron, cause what you call trance today is just

pop-dance music.


i'm sorry but this track really isn't something most people would consider trance. I only made it to 2:30 in because the track really didn't have any direction. There's a whole lot more I can say but just take a look at the differences between even minor label releases from the newest of the new people to your track.


Posted by zidumare on Jan-04-2012 22:16:

quote:
Originally posted by MrPhilleh
i'm sorry but this track really isn't something most people would consider trance. I only made it to 2:30 in because the track really didn't have any direction. There's a whole lot more I can say but just take a look at the differences between even minor label releases from the newest of the new people to your track.


2:30 is where the song begins...


Posted by zidumare on Jan-04-2012 22:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Euforix
If you want people to give you serious reviews you'd better start asking them seriously and not acting like a kiddo.


yeah but i asked for serious reviews, i didnt ask people to tell me how to make a generic club song...

ps. if people are allowed to "formulate opinions" about my song without any actual hard evidence, im allowed to "formulate opinions" about their opinions, am i not? if we get some maturity in the discussion, i will be more mature as well.


Posted by Vector A on Jan-04-2012 22:35:

My track is better than yours.

Lunga by mafoogabooga


Posted by Camwin on Jan-04-2012 22:48:

Yeah the sound quality is crap.
I completely agree with the structure of it. It's not really going anywhere.
In saying that i like what you've done.
Your slight hints of acid add to it.
Sounds like a tone down version of something Combichrist would do.


Posted by pointPi on Jan-05-2012 13:19:



Seriously though, I can see your frustration. You don't like that music you don't dig is getting way more popular than music you do dig. It has somehow turned you into a tortured soul. What you've made is the musical equivalent of this:

http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/teamt/oancitizen/brows-held-high/33548-trash-humpers

Hope you got enlightened.


Posted by Julz on Jan-05-2012 13:37:

Why is there 2 threads for this???
It was shit the first time round, a new thread dont make it sound anybetter.


Posted by euphoria on Jan-05-2012 17:20:

quote:
Originally posted by zidumare
im sorry i missed all the over extended break downs, stupid piano and vocals in the middle and the weak melody drop near the end.

SORRY I MISSED ALL THAT...

go back to the roots of trance moron, cause what you call trance today is just

pop-dance music.


Sorry, I was trying to be nice. Clearly you aren't so now I will just be honest. Your song sucks!

A genre is a genre, you can't make House and tell people its Rock. It just doesn't work that way.


Posted by Trance-M on Jan-05-2012 19:35:

quote:
Originally posted by euphoria
This doesn't sound very trancy.


This and it's a serious comment.

Some nice sounds, but missing what most people call trance (old and new).


Posted by mishu.edm on Jan-23-2012 21:49:

hummm... but I think this thread's place should be in the "music prod.promotion" topic, not here there u can get the most useful reviews


Posted by caddyshack on Jan-23-2012 23:16:

quote:
Originally posted by zidumare
yeah but i asked for serious reviews, i didnt ask people to tell me how to make a generic club song...

ps. if people are allowed to "formulate opinions" about my song without any actual hard evidence, im allowed to "formulate opinions" about their opinions, am i not? if we get some maturity in the discussion, i will be more mature as well.


If you wern't prepared for a negative opinion you should have asked.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.